The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The Roman Channel crossing of A.D. 43 : the constraints on Claudius's naval strategy

The Roman Channel crossing of A.D. 43 : the constraints on Claudius's naval strategy
The Roman Channel crossing of A.D. 43 : the constraints on Claudius's naval strategy

The academic consensus that the Roman invasion of A.D. 43 landed at Richborough, Kent, has been challenged in recent years. Proponents of the alternative hypothesis that it took place at or near Fishbourne, West Sussex, have claimed that this makes better sense of the admittedly garbled account in the ancient sources of the land campaign in Britain. This thesis asks what sense the Fishbourne hypothesis makes in terms of the options for the naval strategy of the crossing. After considering the respective archaeological and topographical contexts of Richborough and of Chichester Harbour, the thesis discusses the type of ships which would have been available to the Roman invasion forces and assesses the evidence for their performance. It concludes that the transports would have been square-rigged ships of the Romano-Celtic tradition with extremely limited windward performance and sluggish speed potential. The constraints imposed on ships of such limited performance by the marine environment are discussed, including the significance of the tidal régime in the Dover Strait and the English Channel, the statistical frequency of the prevailing winds and the nature of the navigational hazards. On the basis of information given in Caesar's account a century earlier, an estimate is made of the number of ships required to transport the whole invasion force across the Channel at the same time and the conclusion is reached that this figure might be in the order of 725 to 1,050 vessels, including escorting warships. Drawing evidence from invasion passages made at other times in the Channel, the thesis investigates the constraints imposed on the naval operation by the number of ships involved. Further study of the conduct of these invasion passages concludes that the option chosen for each is heavily influenced both by the maritime environment of the Channel and the politico/strategic context of the invasion. The thesis concludes by examining the options available to the Roman naval planners of A.D. 43 and argues that the strategic situation at that time was such that an invasion landing anywhere in the Solent area was out of the question. The most likely scenario is that the invasion forces crossed from Boulogne in three groups to land at a secure beachhead at Richborough.

University of Southampton
Grainge, Gerald
83ce8ae3-5ddb-4390-a3aa-5a5890554673
Grainge, Gerald
83ce8ae3-5ddb-4390-a3aa-5a5890554673

Grainge, Gerald (2001) The Roman Channel crossing of A.D. 43 : the constraints on Claudius's naval strategy. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

The academic consensus that the Roman invasion of A.D. 43 landed at Richborough, Kent, has been challenged in recent years. Proponents of the alternative hypothesis that it took place at or near Fishbourne, West Sussex, have claimed that this makes better sense of the admittedly garbled account in the ancient sources of the land campaign in Britain. This thesis asks what sense the Fishbourne hypothesis makes in terms of the options for the naval strategy of the crossing. After considering the respective archaeological and topographical contexts of Richborough and of Chichester Harbour, the thesis discusses the type of ships which would have been available to the Roman invasion forces and assesses the evidence for their performance. It concludes that the transports would have been square-rigged ships of the Romano-Celtic tradition with extremely limited windward performance and sluggish speed potential. The constraints imposed on ships of such limited performance by the marine environment are discussed, including the significance of the tidal régime in the Dover Strait and the English Channel, the statistical frequency of the prevailing winds and the nature of the navigational hazards. On the basis of information given in Caesar's account a century earlier, an estimate is made of the number of ships required to transport the whole invasion force across the Channel at the same time and the conclusion is reached that this figure might be in the order of 725 to 1,050 vessels, including escorting warships. Drawing evidence from invasion passages made at other times in the Channel, the thesis investigates the constraints imposed on the naval operation by the number of ships involved. Further study of the conduct of these invasion passages concludes that the option chosen for each is heavily influenced both by the maritime environment of the Channel and the politico/strategic context of the invasion. The thesis concludes by examining the options available to the Roman naval planners of A.D. 43 and argues that the strategic situation at that time was such that an invasion landing anywhere in the Solent area was out of the question. The most likely scenario is that the invasion forces crossed from Boulogne in three groups to land at a secure beachhead at Richborough.

Text
790624.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (31MB)

More information

Published date: 2001

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 464417
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/464417
PURE UUID: c08b0df1-05bc-4f06-86df-911b551b934c

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Jul 2022 23:36
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 19:30

Export record

Contributors

Author: Gerald Grainge

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×