New strategies for assessing the sequence selective binding of small molecules to DNA
New strategies for assessing the sequence selective binding of small molecules to DNA
We have developed two different approaches towards overcoming limitations of footprinting.
REPSA: (Restriction Enzyme Protection Selection and Amplification) is a novel technique used to determine the binding sites of DNA binding ligands. This technique uses type IIs restriction enzymes (which cut several bases away from their recognition sites) to selectively cleave unbound DNA, while DNA fragments to which the ligand is bound are protected from digestion. The reaction is performed with oligonucleotides containing recognition sites for these enzymes which flank a central region of random bases around their cutting site. The uncut products of the reaction are amplified by PCR, and are subjected to further rounds of drug binding and enzyme cleavage, enriching for oligonucleotides containing the preferred ligand binding sites. After several rounds of selection the fragments are cloned and sequenced, revealing the preferred binding sites. We have successfully employed this technique for confirming the binding sites of TANDEM (TpA) and distamycin (AT), though it has been less successful for determining the binding sites of echinomycin (CpG).
MULTISITE: We have prepared a DNA footprinting substrate which contains all 136 possible tetranucleotide sequences, and have used DNase I footprinting to examine the binding of some ligands with known recognition properties. These ligands include actinomycin, which is known to bind to GpC; echinomycin (CpG), TANDEM (TpA), mithramycin (GpC, GpG) and the AT-selective minor groove binding ligands distamycin and Hoechst 33258. These ligands show large differences in their binding to tetranucleotides which contain the preferred dinucleotide steps. For example ACGT and ACGG are much better binding sites for echinomycin than GCGC, CCGG and GCGG.
University of Southampton
Lavesa Curto, Manuel
7a814fbd-fc38-4807-b78d-ed4968f91538
2001
Lavesa Curto, Manuel
7a814fbd-fc38-4807-b78d-ed4968f91538
Lavesa Curto, Manuel
(2001)
New strategies for assessing the sequence selective binding of small molecules to DNA.
University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
We have developed two different approaches towards overcoming limitations of footprinting.
REPSA: (Restriction Enzyme Protection Selection and Amplification) is a novel technique used to determine the binding sites of DNA binding ligands. This technique uses type IIs restriction enzymes (which cut several bases away from their recognition sites) to selectively cleave unbound DNA, while DNA fragments to which the ligand is bound are protected from digestion. The reaction is performed with oligonucleotides containing recognition sites for these enzymes which flank a central region of random bases around their cutting site. The uncut products of the reaction are amplified by PCR, and are subjected to further rounds of drug binding and enzyme cleavage, enriching for oligonucleotides containing the preferred ligand binding sites. After several rounds of selection the fragments are cloned and sequenced, revealing the preferred binding sites. We have successfully employed this technique for confirming the binding sites of TANDEM (TpA) and distamycin (AT), though it has been less successful for determining the binding sites of echinomycin (CpG).
MULTISITE: We have prepared a DNA footprinting substrate which contains all 136 possible tetranucleotide sequences, and have used DNase I footprinting to examine the binding of some ligands with known recognition properties. These ligands include actinomycin, which is known to bind to GpC; echinomycin (CpG), TANDEM (TpA), mithramycin (GpC, GpG) and the AT-selective minor groove binding ligands distamycin and Hoechst 33258. These ligands show large differences in their binding to tetranucleotides which contain the preferred dinucleotide steps. For example ACGT and ACGG are much better binding sites for echinomycin than GCGC, CCGG and GCGG.
Text
815585.pdf
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 2001
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 464508
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/464508
PURE UUID: eac18faa-2f55-4591-9309-524001a21c28
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 04 Jul 2022 23:43
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 19:34
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Manuel Lavesa Curto
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics