Information content of audit reports with respect to delisting in Thailand
Information content of audit reports with respect to delisting in Thailand
This research analyses empirical evidence of the relationship between audit reports (i.e. going concern audit reports and all types of audit qualifications) and delisting factors in stock markets. The data set comprises quoted companies between 1994 and 2000 in the emerging Thai Stock Market. The research methodology is developed based on the work of Lennox (1999a). Conditional probability, mainly logit regression is employed. Potential factors, both adopted from previous studies and introduced by the present study, cover three main areas: macroeconomic factors, company internal factors, and audit reports. The findings indicate that the potential factors are not important determinants of voluntary delisting. On the other hand, the empirical results show that going concern qualifications issued under modified opinions are a predictor of mandatory delisting. However, going concern qualification issued under both unqualified opinions with explanatory paragraphs and also under modified opinions do not signal useful incremental information about the probability of mandatory delisting. This study also finds that when the lagged effect is taken into account, all types of audit qualifications issued under modified opinions are important determinants of mandatory delisting. apart from audit reports, a decrease in Gross Domestic Product (GDP) significantly influences mandatory delisting probability. In addition, the study finds that bad trading record announcements by the Thai Stock Exchange provide useful incremental information about the probability of mandatory delisting. In addition, a decrease in short-term liquidity and gross cashflow indicate that low profits increase liquidity problems and the likelihood of mandatory delisting. Finally, the analysis also indicates that the size of auditing firms (Big 5 and Non-Big 5), debt-turnover, gearing ratios and returns on capital are unlikely to be factors influencing mandatory delisting probability.
University of Southampton
Boonyanet, Wachira M
c6816fd4-d129-4769-bf89-802560585d3f
2002
Boonyanet, Wachira M
c6816fd4-d129-4769-bf89-802560585d3f
Boonyanet, Wachira M
(2002)
Information content of audit reports with respect to delisting in Thailand.
University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
This research analyses empirical evidence of the relationship between audit reports (i.e. going concern audit reports and all types of audit qualifications) and delisting factors in stock markets. The data set comprises quoted companies between 1994 and 2000 in the emerging Thai Stock Market. The research methodology is developed based on the work of Lennox (1999a). Conditional probability, mainly logit regression is employed. Potential factors, both adopted from previous studies and introduced by the present study, cover three main areas: macroeconomic factors, company internal factors, and audit reports. The findings indicate that the potential factors are not important determinants of voluntary delisting. On the other hand, the empirical results show that going concern qualifications issued under modified opinions are a predictor of mandatory delisting. However, going concern qualification issued under both unqualified opinions with explanatory paragraphs and also under modified opinions do not signal useful incremental information about the probability of mandatory delisting. This study also finds that when the lagged effect is taken into account, all types of audit qualifications issued under modified opinions are important determinants of mandatory delisting. apart from audit reports, a decrease in Gross Domestic Product (GDP) significantly influences mandatory delisting probability. In addition, the study finds that bad trading record announcements by the Thai Stock Exchange provide useful incremental information about the probability of mandatory delisting. In addition, a decrease in short-term liquidity and gross cashflow indicate that low profits increase liquidity problems and the likelihood of mandatory delisting. Finally, the analysis also indicates that the size of auditing firms (Big 5 and Non-Big 5), debt-turnover, gearing ratios and returns on capital are unlikely to be factors influencing mandatory delisting probability.
Text
874470.pdf
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 2002
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 464787
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/464787
PURE UUID: 475ab994-4649-43a7-b029-6a7f33fc7980
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Jul 2022 00:01
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 19:44
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Wachira M Boonyanet
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics