The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Cost recovery for sanitation services : the case of poor urban areas in Zimbabwe

Cost recovery for sanitation services : the case of poor urban areas in Zimbabwe
Cost recovery for sanitation services : the case of poor urban areas in Zimbabwe

Poor cost recovery has long since been identified as one of the major causes of failure of sanitation programmes. Therefore, current approaches such as the strategic sanitation approach emphasise full cost recovery in urban areas. However, poor sanitation is both a symptom and cause of poverty. There is need therefore, to cushion the urban poor from potential negative effects of full cost recovery policies. Ways through which cost and willingness to pay information could be used to set tariffs which improve cost recovery, without denying the urban poor access to basic sanitation services, are investigated in this thesis. Full cost accounting and the contingent valuation method are used to determine the cost of sanitation services and the willingness of households to pay for these services. The thesis differs from other willingness to pay studies by focusing on those who are unwilling or unable to pay for services.

Low tariffs, and restrictive institutional and regulatory frameworks are identified as major causes of poor sanitation in urban areas of Zimbabwe. The urban poor are willing to pay amounts which are substantially higher than the prevailing tariffs. However, it is found that the urban poor are not a homogeneous group and not all residents can afford to pay for the full capital cost of constructing sanitation facilities or for the recurrent cost of operating services. There is a real danger therefore, that pursuing full cost recovery and basing investment in sanitation solely on willingness to pay may exclude the very poor urban residents. Information on cost and household willingness to pay is used to illustrate the various classes of poor urban residents. Appropriate cost recovery policies are then suggested for each group.

It is recommended that instead of doing nothing or deferring investment in situations where willingness to pay is low, which is what most willingness to pay studies recommend, cost and willingness to pay information should be used to design alternative financing mechanisms which ensure that the very poor have access to basic sanitation services. Such mechanisms include community finance, loan and credit facilities, and subsidies.

University of Southampton
Manase, Gift
c8e3ed2a-0181-47ed-8a84-67fb31b1c788
Manase, Gift
c8e3ed2a-0181-47ed-8a84-67fb31b1c788

Manase, Gift (2003) Cost recovery for sanitation services : the case of poor urban areas in Zimbabwe. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Poor cost recovery has long since been identified as one of the major causes of failure of sanitation programmes. Therefore, current approaches such as the strategic sanitation approach emphasise full cost recovery in urban areas. However, poor sanitation is both a symptom and cause of poverty. There is need therefore, to cushion the urban poor from potential negative effects of full cost recovery policies. Ways through which cost and willingness to pay information could be used to set tariffs which improve cost recovery, without denying the urban poor access to basic sanitation services, are investigated in this thesis. Full cost accounting and the contingent valuation method are used to determine the cost of sanitation services and the willingness of households to pay for these services. The thesis differs from other willingness to pay studies by focusing on those who are unwilling or unable to pay for services.

Low tariffs, and restrictive institutional and regulatory frameworks are identified as major causes of poor sanitation in urban areas of Zimbabwe. The urban poor are willing to pay amounts which are substantially higher than the prevailing tariffs. However, it is found that the urban poor are not a homogeneous group and not all residents can afford to pay for the full capital cost of constructing sanitation facilities or for the recurrent cost of operating services. There is a real danger therefore, that pursuing full cost recovery and basing investment in sanitation solely on willingness to pay may exclude the very poor urban residents. Information on cost and household willingness to pay is used to illustrate the various classes of poor urban residents. Appropriate cost recovery policies are then suggested for each group.

It is recommended that instead of doing nothing or deferring investment in situations where willingness to pay is low, which is what most willingness to pay studies recommend, cost and willingness to pay information should be used to design alternative financing mechanisms which ensure that the very poor have access to basic sanitation services. Such mechanisms include community finance, loan and credit facilities, and subsidies.

Text
905105.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (30MB)

More information

Published date: 2003

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 465002
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/465002
PURE UUID: fdda373c-0e30-473a-8e48-9ee5363cdad8

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Jul 2022 00:15
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 19:53

Export record

Contributors

Author: Gift Manase

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×