The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Mathematical reasoning in collaborative small groups : the role of peer talk in the secondary school classroom

Mathematical reasoning in collaborative small groups : the role of peer talk in the secondary school classroom
Mathematical reasoning in collaborative small groups : the role of peer talk in the secondary school classroom

This study focuses on the nature and occurrence of particular forms of discourse amongst peers in collaborative small groups in secondary mathematics classrooms.  The forms of talk studied are those which are thought to contribute to mathematical reasoning.  The use of pupil discourse in small group activities as a means of mathematics learning is described mainly as theoretical models.  There is little research linking the quality of mathematical thinking, represented by exploratory talk, and the use of small group structures in secondary mathematics classrooms.

Mercer (1995) describes ‘exploratory talk’ as the type of talk which contributes directly to learning taking place.  The aim of my study is to test the validity of Mercer’s model in the secondary mathematics classroom and to determine what forms of peer talk contribute to enhancing mathematical reasoning.  In contrast to existing research on small group work, which has usually taken a quasi-experimental approach, the methodology adopted for this study is naturalistic and ethnographic because this is the best way of providing evidence in practice for practitioner teachers.  The imperative is to demonstrate the theory in a real classroom situation.

The outcomes from my research indicate that Mercer’s model for small group talk, established in primary classrooms, is valid for secondary classrooms.  All three categories of talk are evident in secondary mathematics classrooms.  However, as a theoretical model for describing mathematical reasoning amongst secondary age students, Mercer’s model is limited.  This research raises two main issues in relation to this.  First, the model does not explain how shared (or distributed) cognition occurs, nor the extent to which the collaboration affects this.

Secondly, the study raises significant pedagogic questions related to improving the extent to which exploratory talk occurs in mathematics classrooms.  Published research suggests that effective small group work is best achieved in groups whose composition is changed frequently.  This study indicates that friendship groupings which work together over long periods of time, sometimes years, provide evidence of high levels of exploratory talk, both in quantity and quality.

University of Southampton
Edwards, Julie-Ann
62e500a9-8d37-4489-bc49-21d3e60987ae
Edwards, Julie-Ann
62e500a9-8d37-4489-bc49-21d3e60987ae

Edwards, Julie-Ann (2003) Mathematical reasoning in collaborative small groups : the role of peer talk in the secondary school classroom. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

This study focuses on the nature and occurrence of particular forms of discourse amongst peers in collaborative small groups in secondary mathematics classrooms.  The forms of talk studied are those which are thought to contribute to mathematical reasoning.  The use of pupil discourse in small group activities as a means of mathematics learning is described mainly as theoretical models.  There is little research linking the quality of mathematical thinking, represented by exploratory talk, and the use of small group structures in secondary mathematics classrooms.

Mercer (1995) describes ‘exploratory talk’ as the type of talk which contributes directly to learning taking place.  The aim of my study is to test the validity of Mercer’s model in the secondary mathematics classroom and to determine what forms of peer talk contribute to enhancing mathematical reasoning.  In contrast to existing research on small group work, which has usually taken a quasi-experimental approach, the methodology adopted for this study is naturalistic and ethnographic because this is the best way of providing evidence in practice for practitioner teachers.  The imperative is to demonstrate the theory in a real classroom situation.

The outcomes from my research indicate that Mercer’s model for small group talk, established in primary classrooms, is valid for secondary classrooms.  All three categories of talk are evident in secondary mathematics classrooms.  However, as a theoretical model for describing mathematical reasoning amongst secondary age students, Mercer’s model is limited.  This research raises two main issues in relation to this.  First, the model does not explain how shared (or distributed) cognition occurs, nor the extent to which the collaboration affects this.

Secondly, the study raises significant pedagogic questions related to improving the extent to which exploratory talk occurs in mathematics classrooms.  Published research suggests that effective small group work is best achieved in groups whose composition is changed frequently.  This study indicates that friendship groupings which work together over long periods of time, sometimes years, provide evidence of high levels of exploratory talk, both in quantity and quality.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2003

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 465343
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/465343
PURE UUID: 45396482-886e-44e2-96ec-91b1e4d28e5e

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Jul 2022 00:38
Last modified: 05 Jul 2022 00:38

Export record

Contributors

Author: Julie-Ann Edwards

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×