Cognitive and psychophysiological responses to threat stimuli : the effect of perceived proximity
Cognitive and psychophysiological responses to threat stimuli : the effect of perceived proximity
In a series of six studies, this thesis examines the effect of the perceived proximity of a threat on cognitive and psychophysiological responses. Study 1 used a visual probe task to assess initial attentional allocation in high and low spider-fearful participants to pictures of distally and proximally perceived spiders and rabbits. However, the results did not show a significant interaction effect of fear group and stimulus proximity on attentional bias. Study 2 involved a physiological recording task measuring startle eye blink and skin conductance responses (SCR) followed by a visual probe task, using similar stimuli and participants. The results showed that the proximal spider pictures elicited a potential startle response in the high fear group. This group also showed greater SCRs to the spider pictures in general. Study 3 involved a hybrid task that allowed for the concurrent assessments of attentional measures and physiological responses. Although the high fear group showed potentiated startle and SCRs whilst viewing the spider pictures, there was no difference in their psychophysiological responses between the two perceived proximity conditions. The eye movement measures showed that the high fear group was more likely than the low fear group to direct their gaze towards spiders; however this bias was not affected by the proximity manipulation. Study 4 used the same hybrid task, but involved a greater size ratio between the proximal and distal stimuli. The startle probe results replicated the finding of Study 2, with the proximal spiders eliciting a potentiated startle response in the high fear group. However, the other measures did not differentiate between the fear groups. Study 5 looked at behavioural action tendencies suing an Affective Simon Task. Participants in the high fear group were relatively faster to avoid and slower to approach proximal spiders compared to the low fear group. Study 6 assesses eye movement measures. The high fear group demonstrated faster initial orienting towards the proximal spiders, followed by avoidance, as reflected by the duration of gaze.
The results of these studies suggest that the psychophysiological and attentional responses elicited by proximal and distal threat are indeed different, as predicted by the various models discussed. Distal threat elicits increased SCRs in fearful participants, but no reliable potentiated startle response or behavioural tendencies of avoidance. Proximal threat, on the other had, elicits increased SCRs and a potentiated startle response (in 2 out of 3 studies), faster initial orienting with subsequent avoidance, and the behavioural tendencies of avoidance in fearful participants. These results provide some support for predictions from both the cognitive models of anxiety and the models based on animal behaviours.
University of Southampton
Popper, Claire Elizabeth
a3576630-5402-4e5b-ae85-3130e8954882
2004
Popper, Claire Elizabeth
a3576630-5402-4e5b-ae85-3130e8954882
Popper, Claire Elizabeth
(2004)
Cognitive and psychophysiological responses to threat stimuli : the effect of perceived proximity.
University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
In a series of six studies, this thesis examines the effect of the perceived proximity of a threat on cognitive and psychophysiological responses. Study 1 used a visual probe task to assess initial attentional allocation in high and low spider-fearful participants to pictures of distally and proximally perceived spiders and rabbits. However, the results did not show a significant interaction effect of fear group and stimulus proximity on attentional bias. Study 2 involved a physiological recording task measuring startle eye blink and skin conductance responses (SCR) followed by a visual probe task, using similar stimuli and participants. The results showed that the proximal spider pictures elicited a potential startle response in the high fear group. This group also showed greater SCRs to the spider pictures in general. Study 3 involved a hybrid task that allowed for the concurrent assessments of attentional measures and physiological responses. Although the high fear group showed potentiated startle and SCRs whilst viewing the spider pictures, there was no difference in their psychophysiological responses between the two perceived proximity conditions. The eye movement measures showed that the high fear group was more likely than the low fear group to direct their gaze towards spiders; however this bias was not affected by the proximity manipulation. Study 4 used the same hybrid task, but involved a greater size ratio between the proximal and distal stimuli. The startle probe results replicated the finding of Study 2, with the proximal spiders eliciting a potentiated startle response in the high fear group. However, the other measures did not differentiate between the fear groups. Study 5 looked at behavioural action tendencies suing an Affective Simon Task. Participants in the high fear group were relatively faster to avoid and slower to approach proximal spiders compared to the low fear group. Study 6 assesses eye movement measures. The high fear group demonstrated faster initial orienting towards the proximal spiders, followed by avoidance, as reflected by the duration of gaze.
The results of these studies suggest that the psychophysiological and attentional responses elicited by proximal and distal threat are indeed different, as predicted by the various models discussed. Distal threat elicits increased SCRs in fearful participants, but no reliable potentiated startle response or behavioural tendencies of avoidance. Proximal threat, on the other had, elicits increased SCRs and a potentiated startle response (in 2 out of 3 studies), faster initial orienting with subsequent avoidance, and the behavioural tendencies of avoidance in fearful participants. These results provide some support for predictions from both the cognitive models of anxiety and the models based on animal behaviours.
Text
965211.pdf
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 2004
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 465488
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/465488
PURE UUID: 5fa59381-39c3-4b51-b7e8-01ab62c55783
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Jul 2022 01:23
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 20:12
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Claire Elizabeth Popper
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics