(Re-)Defining the relationships between composer, performer and listener : Earle Brown, John Cage, Morton Feldman and Christian Wolff
(Re-)Defining the relationships between composer, performer and listener : Earle Brown, John Cage, Morton Feldman and Christian Wolff
This thesis examines works by Earle Brown (1926-2002), John Cage (1912-1992), Morton Feldman (1926-1987) and Christian Wolff (b. 1934), some of whose compositions avoid a fixed and determinate sequence of sounds in performance. This can lead to a redefinition of the relationships between composer, performer and listener, thus changing the role of the musicians and asking for a different attitude on the part of listeners. Such an alteration of the traditional, hierarchical model of music production was motivated, to differing degrees, by aesthetic, political and sociological considerations.
Drawing on diverse music, mostly written between 1950 and 1971, such as Feldman’s Projection 1 (1950), Cage’s 4’33” (1952) and O’OO” (1962), Brown’s Folio (1952-53) and Wolff’s Prose Collection (1968-1971, ca. 1986, 1997), this study explores the compositional and notational ideas which have changed the status of the ‘work’. Such music aims neither for a reified work, where all parameters are totally fixed, nor for a completely ‘free’ improvisation.
Instead of trying to establish to historical perspective on this repertoire, the thesis compares the composers’ works by focusing on overarching issues. It is shown that the four composers are less homogenous in their aesthetic, their compositional approaches, and in their attempts to redefine the relationships between themselves and the performance of their work, than previously assumed. This research illustrates that, in spite of a common understanding that Brown, Cage, Feldman and Wolff experimented with traditional conceptions of art music, this does not mean that many works negate the traditional functions of composer, performer and listener. However, a number of compositions redefine the idea of a musical ‘work’, and alter the functions of, and relationships between composer, performed and listener.
University of Southampton
Gresser, Clemens
6faece6f-d3a8-45dc-b475-ab099f583e68
2004
Gresser, Clemens
6faece6f-d3a8-45dc-b475-ab099f583e68
Gresser, Clemens
(2004)
(Re-)Defining the relationships between composer, performer and listener : Earle Brown, John Cage, Morton Feldman and Christian Wolff.
University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
This thesis examines works by Earle Brown (1926-2002), John Cage (1912-1992), Morton Feldman (1926-1987) and Christian Wolff (b. 1934), some of whose compositions avoid a fixed and determinate sequence of sounds in performance. This can lead to a redefinition of the relationships between composer, performer and listener, thus changing the role of the musicians and asking for a different attitude on the part of listeners. Such an alteration of the traditional, hierarchical model of music production was motivated, to differing degrees, by aesthetic, political and sociological considerations.
Drawing on diverse music, mostly written between 1950 and 1971, such as Feldman’s Projection 1 (1950), Cage’s 4’33” (1952) and O’OO” (1962), Brown’s Folio (1952-53) and Wolff’s Prose Collection (1968-1971, ca. 1986, 1997), this study explores the compositional and notational ideas which have changed the status of the ‘work’. Such music aims neither for a reified work, where all parameters are totally fixed, nor for a completely ‘free’ improvisation.
Instead of trying to establish to historical perspective on this repertoire, the thesis compares the composers’ works by focusing on overarching issues. It is shown that the four composers are less homogenous in their aesthetic, their compositional approaches, and in their attempts to redefine the relationships between themselves and the performance of their work, than previously assumed. This research illustrates that, in spite of a common understanding that Brown, Cage, Feldman and Wolff experimented with traditional conceptions of art music, this does not mean that many works negate the traditional functions of composer, performer and listener. However, a number of compositions redefine the idea of a musical ‘work’, and alter the functions of, and relationships between composer, performed and listener.
Text
973853.pdf
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 2004
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 465571
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/465571
PURE UUID: 1ca47993-1acf-4586-b73f-29b5a051bd3a
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Jul 2022 01:51
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 20:15
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Clemens Gresser
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics