Defibrillation, the coronary venous system and the passive electrode affect
Defibrillation, the coronary venous system and the passive electrode affect
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators are becoming an increasingly accepted treatment for primary and secondary prevention of arrhythmic death. Key to the efficacy and future development of these devices is the defibrillation threshold (the amount of energy required to reliably terminate fibrillation). Changing the vectors of defibrillation through lead positioning has the potential to reduce defibrillation threshold. Current methods for the assessment of defibrillation threshold in humans lack repeatability and precision.
We undertook a program of human and porcine studies to investigate the impact on defibrillation threshold of placing electrodes in the coronary venous system. Both actively connected and passive (adjacent, unconnected) coronary venous electrodes were studied. We also developed and evaluated a method of assessing defibrillation threshold by delivering several test shocks following each induction.
In defibrillation from the middle cardiac vein placement of a passive electrode affect reduces defibrillation threshold by 17%. Middle cardiac vein electrodes exert no passive electrode affect on right ventricular endocardial defibrillation. In the pig anodes comprised of middle cardiac vein alone are equally effective as tied middle cardiac vein, right ventricular anodes. Both these anodes decrease defibrillation threshold compared to right ventricle alone. The novel method of defibrillation threshold assessment developed increases repeatability compared to current algorithms. In human studies neither middle cardiac vein nor auxiliary lateral cardiac vein defibrillation decrease defibrillation threshold.
The passive electrode affect has the capacity to decrease defibrillation threshold. There is a discrepancy between the efficacy of coronary venous defibrillation in man and pigs due to the difference in orientation of pig and human hearts and the higher impedance of the configuration in man. A defibrillation threshold assessment algorithm delivering several test shocks after each induction may replace binary searches as gold standard in clinical studies.
University of Southampton
Paisey, John Robert
76e6e4ec-eca8-46d4-b079-f4ffb7f953cf
2004
Paisey, John Robert
76e6e4ec-eca8-46d4-b079-f4ffb7f953cf
Paisey, John Robert
(2004)
Defibrillation, the coronary venous system and the passive electrode affect.
University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators are becoming an increasingly accepted treatment for primary and secondary prevention of arrhythmic death. Key to the efficacy and future development of these devices is the defibrillation threshold (the amount of energy required to reliably terminate fibrillation). Changing the vectors of defibrillation through lead positioning has the potential to reduce defibrillation threshold. Current methods for the assessment of defibrillation threshold in humans lack repeatability and precision.
We undertook a program of human and porcine studies to investigate the impact on defibrillation threshold of placing electrodes in the coronary venous system. Both actively connected and passive (adjacent, unconnected) coronary venous electrodes were studied. We also developed and evaluated a method of assessing defibrillation threshold by delivering several test shocks following each induction.
In defibrillation from the middle cardiac vein placement of a passive electrode affect reduces defibrillation threshold by 17%. Middle cardiac vein electrodes exert no passive electrode affect on right ventricular endocardial defibrillation. In the pig anodes comprised of middle cardiac vein alone are equally effective as tied middle cardiac vein, right ventricular anodes. Both these anodes decrease defibrillation threshold compared to right ventricle alone. The novel method of defibrillation threshold assessment developed increases repeatability compared to current algorithms. In human studies neither middle cardiac vein nor auxiliary lateral cardiac vein defibrillation decrease defibrillation threshold.
The passive electrode affect has the capacity to decrease defibrillation threshold. There is a discrepancy between the efficacy of coronary venous defibrillation in man and pigs due to the difference in orientation of pig and human hearts and the higher impedance of the configuration in man. A defibrillation threshold assessment algorithm delivering several test shocks after each induction may replace binary searches as gold standard in clinical studies.
Text
993382.pdf
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 2004
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 465775
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/465775
PURE UUID: 78993858-5ba0-45f7-9ce3-14c1f6aed62a
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Jul 2022 02:58
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 20:21
Export record
Contributors
Author:
John Robert Paisey
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics