The Essex rebellion, 1601 : subversion or supplication?
The Essex rebellion, 1601 : subversion or supplication?
 
  The most influential accounts of Tudor chivalry rest on the notion that there was a conflict of interests between the monarchy and the nobility.  Yet this thesis has been fundamentally challenged by recent research into the continuing importance of the nobility.  This study advances the debate by re-assessing the significance of chivalric values at the later-Elizabethan court.  It will focus on the rise and fall of Robert Devereux, second earl of Essex.  Essex’s sense of his own identity – of his socio-political function as nobleman, knight and courtier – was crucial to his political actions.  This study will argue that to understand the latter we have to work towards an understanding of his chivalric identity – of the values that he considered important.
 The defining event of Essex’s career was his rebellion of 1601.  By relating the rebellion to contemporary socio-political paradigms, expressed before, during and after the ‘rebellion’ by the rebels themselves, this study will present if not as part of any longstanding tradition of dissent and suppression but as a momentary crisis, specific to the breakdown of the relationship between Elizabeth and Essex.  Exploring the central importance of this relationship and thereby questioning recent historians’ tendency to marginalize the queen, the study will explore Elizabeth’s continuing centrality to the conduct of political life during the last years of her reign.
 Where historians have somewhat unquestioningly agreed that the last decade of Elizabeth’s reign was characterised by the total collapse of consensus and the eruption of ‘factional strife’ between Essex and the Cecils, this study, through an examination of the values and beliefs that motivated both Essex and the Cecils, will question the extent to which the period was racked by factional intrigue.  In so doing, this study will compel a fundamental reappraisal of the last years of Elizabeth’s reign.
    University of Southampton
   
  
    
      Dickinson, Janet Elizabeth
      
     
  
  
   
  
  
    
      2005
    
    
  
  
    
      Dickinson, Janet Elizabeth
      
     
  
       
    
 
  
    
      
  
 
  
  
  
    Dickinson, Janet Elizabeth
  
  
  
  
   
    (2005)
  
  
    
    The Essex rebellion, 1601 : subversion or supplication?
  University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.
  
   
  
    
      Record type:
      Thesis
      
      
      (Doctoral)
    
   
    
      
        
          Abstract
          The most influential accounts of Tudor chivalry rest on the notion that there was a conflict of interests between the monarchy and the nobility.  Yet this thesis has been fundamentally challenged by recent research into the continuing importance of the nobility.  This study advances the debate by re-assessing the significance of chivalric values at the later-Elizabethan court.  It will focus on the rise and fall of Robert Devereux, second earl of Essex.  Essex’s sense of his own identity – of his socio-political function as nobleman, knight and courtier – was crucial to his political actions.  This study will argue that to understand the latter we have to work towards an understanding of his chivalric identity – of the values that he considered important.
 The defining event of Essex’s career was his rebellion of 1601.  By relating the rebellion to contemporary socio-political paradigms, expressed before, during and after the ‘rebellion’ by the rebels themselves, this study will present if not as part of any longstanding tradition of dissent and suppression but as a momentary crisis, specific to the breakdown of the relationship between Elizabeth and Essex.  Exploring the central importance of this relationship and thereby questioning recent historians’ tendency to marginalize the queen, the study will explore Elizabeth’s continuing centrality to the conduct of political life during the last years of her reign.
 Where historians have somewhat unquestioningly agreed that the last decade of Elizabeth’s reign was characterised by the total collapse of consensus and the eruption of ‘factional strife’ between Essex and the Cecils, this study, through an examination of the values and beliefs that motivated both Essex and the Cecils, will question the extent to which the period was racked by factional intrigue.  In so doing, this study will compel a fundamental reappraisal of the last years of Elizabeth’s reign.
        
        This record has no associated files available for download.
       
    
    
   
  
  
  More information
  
    
      Published date: 2005
 
    
  
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
  
        Identifiers
        Local EPrints ID: 465878
        URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/465878
        
        
        
        
          PURE UUID: eb2aaf6d-44e4-41b1-8675-d4fa3dbc0279
        
  
    
        
          
            
          
        
    
  
  Catalogue record
  Date deposited: 05 Jul 2022 03:24
  Last modified: 05 Jul 2022 03:24
  Export record
  
  
 
 
  
    
    
      Contributors
      
          
          Author:
          
            
              
              
                Janet Elizabeth Dickinson
              
              
            
            
          
        
      
      
      
    
  
   
  
    Download statistics
    
      Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
      
      View more statistics