The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Health investment : how can the state influence the consumer to obtain the maximum health investment?

Health investment : how can the state influence the consumer to obtain the maximum health investment?
Health investment : how can the state influence the consumer to obtain the maximum health investment?

This thesis examines the factors that influence the individual’s decision to undertake an investment in health that, in the short term, provides a health improvement and, in the longer term, provides a potential screening benefit which may require additional health investment. Additionally the thesis examines the methodology of modelling tools that support decision-makers in making resource allocation decisions.

The first chapter reports the literature review of economic theory surrounding health investment especially in relation to prevention, which is applied to the sight test; examining the sight test as a health improvement and as a screening tool. The second chapter empirically examines ‘what factors impact the individual’s decision to undertake a re-investment in health, based on an increase in information’, specifically in the sight test market. The third chapter empirically examines the second part of the main hypothesis, ‘how does the risk of requiring an additional heath investment impact on the decision to undertake the initial investment’, specifically within the general practitioner and prescription charges paradigm. The fourth chapter focuses upon the additional analysis examining the methodology of modelling tools used within healthcare resource allocation decision-making where resources are limited and the impact upon final decision of using a specific tool.

It is found that the risk of requiring an additional (costly) investment will decrease the likelihood of initial investment in health, though once the initial investment is undertaken additional investment will be undertaken if required. The choice of modelling methodology will, given identical data and assumptions, not affect the final outcome or alter the decision-makers’ final result.

University of Southampton
Sidhu, Manpreet Kaur
3267e7d3-8be2-44ae-bf95-678a4c62d3a9
Sidhu, Manpreet Kaur
3267e7d3-8be2-44ae-bf95-678a4c62d3a9

Sidhu, Manpreet Kaur (2006) Health investment : how can the state influence the consumer to obtain the maximum health investment? University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

This thesis examines the factors that influence the individual’s decision to undertake an investment in health that, in the short term, provides a health improvement and, in the longer term, provides a potential screening benefit which may require additional health investment. Additionally the thesis examines the methodology of modelling tools that support decision-makers in making resource allocation decisions.

The first chapter reports the literature review of economic theory surrounding health investment especially in relation to prevention, which is applied to the sight test; examining the sight test as a health improvement and as a screening tool. The second chapter empirically examines ‘what factors impact the individual’s decision to undertake a re-investment in health, based on an increase in information’, specifically in the sight test market. The third chapter empirically examines the second part of the main hypothesis, ‘how does the risk of requiring an additional heath investment impact on the decision to undertake the initial investment’, specifically within the general practitioner and prescription charges paradigm. The fourth chapter focuses upon the additional analysis examining the methodology of modelling tools used within healthcare resource allocation decision-making where resources are limited and the impact upon final decision of using a specific tool.

It is found that the risk of requiring an additional (costly) investment will decrease the likelihood of initial investment in health, though once the initial investment is undertaken additional investment will be undertaken if required. The choice of modelling methodology will, given identical data and assumptions, not affect the final outcome or alter the decision-makers’ final result.

Text
1031250.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (2MB)

More information

Published date: 2006

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 466047
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/466047
PURE UUID: d77fc60c-9b5b-41c6-8c6c-0c796f30cdd9

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Jul 2022 04:07
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 20:29

Export record

Contributors

Author: Manpreet Kaur Sidhu

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×