The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Nature and the restoration-preference connection : a multi-method investigation

Nature and the restoration-preference connection : a multi-method investigation
Nature and the restoration-preference connection : a multi-method investigation

Theories, research, and folklore converge in support of two assertions: people generally like nature (preference); experiencing natural landscapes can be good for us (restoration). This thesis examined whether preferences for nature are stronger when most benefit is potentially afforded; i.e., when experiencing stress (stress reduction theory, e.g., Ulrich, 1983) or attentional fatigue (attention restoration theory, e.g., Kaplan & Kaplan, 1989). The general hypothesis preference for nature is associated with restorative need was tested using a multi-method approach (indirect free response questionnaire; experimental studies with explicit and implicit measures). The questionnaire study uniquely examined within-participant place preferences across a range of mood states (positive as well as negative). Experimental studies were distinctive in using as stimuli images that were preference-matched across category (nature; human-influenced) at baseline. Restorative need was manipulated either within-participant (recall of experiencing 7 different moods) or between participant (experimentally induced stress, relaxation, or directed attentional fatigue). Although the studies were well designed and manipulation checks confirmed successful induction of different levels of stress and directed attentional fatigue, no support was found for the hypothesis that preferences for nature are associated with restorative need. Some recently published studies report results seemingly discordant with those found here; possible explanations for this discrepancy are discussed in terms of the stimuli used, restorative need generated, and the statistical analyses employed.

University of Southampton
Regan, Clair Louise
Regan, Clair Louise

Regan, Clair Louise (2007) Nature and the restoration-preference connection : a multi-method investigation. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Theories, research, and folklore converge in support of two assertions: people generally like nature (preference); experiencing natural landscapes can be good for us (restoration). This thesis examined whether preferences for nature are stronger when most benefit is potentially afforded; i.e., when experiencing stress (stress reduction theory, e.g., Ulrich, 1983) or attentional fatigue (attention restoration theory, e.g., Kaplan & Kaplan, 1989). The general hypothesis preference for nature is associated with restorative need was tested using a multi-method approach (indirect free response questionnaire; experimental studies with explicit and implicit measures). The questionnaire study uniquely examined within-participant place preferences across a range of mood states (positive as well as negative). Experimental studies were distinctive in using as stimuli images that were preference-matched across category (nature; human-influenced) at baseline. Restorative need was manipulated either within-participant (recall of experiencing 7 different moods) or between participant (experimentally induced stress, relaxation, or directed attentional fatigue). Although the studies were well designed and manipulation checks confirmed successful induction of different levels of stress and directed attentional fatigue, no support was found for the hypothesis that preferences for nature are associated with restorative need. Some recently published studies report results seemingly discordant with those found here; possible explanations for this discrepancy are discussed in terms of the stimuli used, restorative need generated, and the statistical analyses employed.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2007

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 466223
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/466223
PURE UUID: 65b9d8d5-0ce4-48e1-b7a0-5eed410b5283

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Jul 2022 04:50
Last modified: 05 Jul 2022 04:50

Export record

Contributors

Author: Clair Louise Regan

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×