Cognitive biases in social anxiety
Cognitive biases in social anxiety
This thesis examined socially anxious individuals’ biases in anticipatory processing, perspective-taking, self-focused attention, intensifying danger or threat, which may be construed as ‘loomingness’, and metacognitive knowledge or beliefs.
Experiment 1 examined the effects of anticipatory processing on a subsequent speech in high and low socially anxious individuals (N = 40). In anticipation, high socially anxious individuals were more anxious and experienced more negative and unhelpful self-images than low socially anxious individuals. They also tended to use the observer perspective more in an anticipated speech, while in an unanticipated speech, they may have been switching between observer and field perspectives. Low socially anxious individuals tended to use the field perspective in both speeches.
Experiment 2 explored using a qualitative approach, the phenomenology of anticipatory processing in high socially anxious individuals (N = 11). Thematic analysis of coded interviews revealed seven broad deductive themes: (1) prior preparation; (2) catastrophic thoughts; (3) recollection of past similar social events; (4) impressions; (5) self-images; (6) avoidance of social situations; and (7) physical symptoms of anxiety; and three Inductive themes: (1) bad dreams and nightmares; (2) biased estimates in intensifying threat; and (3) metacognitives.
Experiments 3 and 4 used the same sample of volunteers (n = 152) to explore the relationship between looming vulnerability and metacognition, respectively, and social anxiety. In Experiment 3, volunteers completed the Looming Maladaptive Style Questionnaire-Two, which assessed social and physical looming.
In Experiment 4, volunteers completed the Thought Control Questionnaire, the Metacognitions Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30), and the Cognitive Self-Consciousness Scale-Expanded.
Experiment 5 used two concepts developed in social psychology, that is, the spotlight effect and the illusion of transparency, to help explain the types of processes that might contribute to the construction of the self as a social object in social anxiety. Participants (N = 60) performed a memory task under either a high or a low social-evaluation condition. Findings provide some support for current cognitive models of social phobia (Clark & Wells, 1995; Rapee & Heimberg, 1997) and suggest the need for an understanding of both the content of cognition and the different kinds of dynamic, cognitive processing styles, namely, metacognitive and looming, that give the content of cognition its significance or salience.
University of Southampton
Brown, Michael Alexander
726bd593-6358-482b-b077-44dce567c2da
2007
Brown, Michael Alexander
726bd593-6358-482b-b077-44dce567c2da
Brown, Michael Alexander
(2007)
Cognitive biases in social anxiety.
University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
This thesis examined socially anxious individuals’ biases in anticipatory processing, perspective-taking, self-focused attention, intensifying danger or threat, which may be construed as ‘loomingness’, and metacognitive knowledge or beliefs.
Experiment 1 examined the effects of anticipatory processing on a subsequent speech in high and low socially anxious individuals (N = 40). In anticipation, high socially anxious individuals were more anxious and experienced more negative and unhelpful self-images than low socially anxious individuals. They also tended to use the observer perspective more in an anticipated speech, while in an unanticipated speech, they may have been switching between observer and field perspectives. Low socially anxious individuals tended to use the field perspective in both speeches.
Experiment 2 explored using a qualitative approach, the phenomenology of anticipatory processing in high socially anxious individuals (N = 11). Thematic analysis of coded interviews revealed seven broad deductive themes: (1) prior preparation; (2) catastrophic thoughts; (3) recollection of past similar social events; (4) impressions; (5) self-images; (6) avoidance of social situations; and (7) physical symptoms of anxiety; and three Inductive themes: (1) bad dreams and nightmares; (2) biased estimates in intensifying threat; and (3) metacognitives.
Experiments 3 and 4 used the same sample of volunteers (n = 152) to explore the relationship between looming vulnerability and metacognition, respectively, and social anxiety. In Experiment 3, volunteers completed the Looming Maladaptive Style Questionnaire-Two, which assessed social and physical looming.
In Experiment 4, volunteers completed the Thought Control Questionnaire, the Metacognitions Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30), and the Cognitive Self-Consciousness Scale-Expanded.
Experiment 5 used two concepts developed in social psychology, that is, the spotlight effect and the illusion of transparency, to help explain the types of processes that might contribute to the construction of the self as a social object in social anxiety. Participants (N = 60) performed a memory task under either a high or a low social-evaluation condition. Findings provide some support for current cognitive models of social phobia (Clark & Wells, 1995; Rapee & Heimberg, 1997) and suggest the need for an understanding of both the content of cognition and the different kinds of dynamic, cognitive processing styles, namely, metacognitive and looming, that give the content of cognition its significance or salience.
Text
1124983.pdf
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 2007
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 466366
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/466366
PURE UUID: e7f4290f-1b34-4068-b4bc-d5149cd92b35
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Jul 2022 05:12
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 20:40
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Michael Alexander Brown
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics