War termination and the just war tradition : "the ethics of the end game"
War termination and the just war tradition : "the ethics of the end game"
Since the time of St. Augustine, philosophers have attempted to outline conditions that make warfare just. This just war tradition has conventionally been divided into two categories: jus ad bellum stating what makes it right to go to war and jus in bello which explains what is right to do in war. The focus of this thesis is to investigate the controversial development of a third category: jus post bellum.
This thesis demonstrates that war termination has not been totally neglected by classic just war texts. This research in itself contributes to the knowledge in the discipline as most current philosophers explain that jus post bellum is a forgotten aspect in just war thinking. By drawing upon these historical resources, building on contemporary thought, and by expanding upon the standard just war doctrine, this thesis generates a comprehensive set of jus post bellum principles, including a section on ‘Cultural Change’ which opposes recent literature. This thesis also stresses the need for jus post bellum principles to relate to a variety of types of conflict, or ‘backdrops’, and will apply these norms to cases of humanitarian interventions as well as inter-state wars.
Moreover, this thesis defends the development of jus post bellum against potential critics; whether they emerge from inside the just war tradition or from outside it. This thesis then engages with the pressing issue as to how such principles should be used in practice. This chapter illustrates the difficulties of using these principles in an absolute manner and will, instead, show how they can best be employed in a flexible way as a guide to action. The final chapter addresses ethical issues surrounding regime change.
University of Southampton
Caney, Jonathan
e55fd0a0-3829-4b9f-9117-4b0fb530dc46
2007
Caney, Jonathan
e55fd0a0-3829-4b9f-9117-4b0fb530dc46
Caney, Jonathan
(2007)
War termination and the just war tradition : "the ethics of the end game".
University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
Since the time of St. Augustine, philosophers have attempted to outline conditions that make warfare just. This just war tradition has conventionally been divided into two categories: jus ad bellum stating what makes it right to go to war and jus in bello which explains what is right to do in war. The focus of this thesis is to investigate the controversial development of a third category: jus post bellum.
This thesis demonstrates that war termination has not been totally neglected by classic just war texts. This research in itself contributes to the knowledge in the discipline as most current philosophers explain that jus post bellum is a forgotten aspect in just war thinking. By drawing upon these historical resources, building on contemporary thought, and by expanding upon the standard just war doctrine, this thesis generates a comprehensive set of jus post bellum principles, including a section on ‘Cultural Change’ which opposes recent literature. This thesis also stresses the need for jus post bellum principles to relate to a variety of types of conflict, or ‘backdrops’, and will apply these norms to cases of humanitarian interventions as well as inter-state wars.
Moreover, this thesis defends the development of jus post bellum against potential critics; whether they emerge from inside the just war tradition or from outside it. This thesis then engages with the pressing issue as to how such principles should be used in practice. This chapter illustrates the difficulties of using these principles in an absolute manner and will, instead, show how they can best be employed in a flexible way as a guide to action. The final chapter addresses ethical issues surrounding regime change.
Text
1125016.pdf
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 2007
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 466378
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/466378
PURE UUID: e8bb0877-a34f-492a-804e-c0f329afc4b6
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Jul 2022 05:12
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 20:40
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Jonathan Caney
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics