The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Evaluation of methods to determine biodegradable municipal waste diversion from landfill

Evaluation of methods to determine biodegradable municipal waste diversion from landfill
Evaluation of methods to determine biodegradable municipal waste diversion from landfill

The biological tests of biochemical methane potential (BMP) and dynamic respiration index (DRI) are recommended by the EA monitoring guidance (Environment Agency, 2005) to evaluate the performance of Waste Disposal Authorities (WDAs) in diverting biodegradable municipal waste (BMW) from landfills by means of mechanical and biological treatment (MBT). Because the biological tests are complex and time- consuming to conduct, chemical tests may provide rapid surrogate measurement of biodegradability. The relative contents of the cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin determined by fibre analysis have been used to assess the degree of decomposition in landfills. However, their relationship with biodegradability has not been well investigated and understood, particularly for mixed BMW. In this study, BMP and DRI, gravimetric test and chemical tests (fibre analysis and TC, TN) were conducted in parallel using a variety of MBT waste samples collected from anaerobic and aerobic degradation (composting) experiments in which real MSW or BMW was used. Two laboratory scale composting reactors were built where four batches of composting experiments were conducted. The results of these tests were compared to identify the correlations between them, especially the correlations between the biological tests and fibre analysis. Evaluations are made based on this study for tests of BMP, DRI4, gravimetric test and TCI TN ratio. The main findings are: (1) Based on the good correlation observed between fibre analysis and biological tests for the treated waste, three linear model equations are proposed to predict the biodegradability upon (C+H)/L ratio or C/L ratio for the BMW during or after the MBT process, thereafter to predict the amount of BMW diverted by MBT in terms of anaerobic biogas potential; (2) The cellulose and hemicellulose contents or the (C+H)/L ratio of the untreated BMW (fresh mechanically pretreated BMW) were not found to correlate directly with biodegradability. This is consistent with the former findings on the specific waste components (untreated waste) by Eleazer et al. (1997) and Godley et al. (2005). It is suggested that untreated BMW and treated BMW need to be investigated separately in examining the relationships between relative fibre content and biodegradability.

University of Southampton
Zheng, Bing
15e738ec-a7e2-48d2-816e-ca8930f91958
Zheng, Bing
15e738ec-a7e2-48d2-816e-ca8930f91958

Zheng, Bing (2008) Evaluation of methods to determine biodegradable municipal waste diversion from landfill. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

The biological tests of biochemical methane potential (BMP) and dynamic respiration index (DRI) are recommended by the EA monitoring guidance (Environment Agency, 2005) to evaluate the performance of Waste Disposal Authorities (WDAs) in diverting biodegradable municipal waste (BMW) from landfills by means of mechanical and biological treatment (MBT). Because the biological tests are complex and time- consuming to conduct, chemical tests may provide rapid surrogate measurement of biodegradability. The relative contents of the cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin determined by fibre analysis have been used to assess the degree of decomposition in landfills. However, their relationship with biodegradability has not been well investigated and understood, particularly for mixed BMW. In this study, BMP and DRI, gravimetric test and chemical tests (fibre analysis and TC, TN) were conducted in parallel using a variety of MBT waste samples collected from anaerobic and aerobic degradation (composting) experiments in which real MSW or BMW was used. Two laboratory scale composting reactors were built where four batches of composting experiments were conducted. The results of these tests were compared to identify the correlations between them, especially the correlations between the biological tests and fibre analysis. Evaluations are made based on this study for tests of BMP, DRI4, gravimetric test and TCI TN ratio. The main findings are: (1) Based on the good correlation observed between fibre analysis and biological tests for the treated waste, three linear model equations are proposed to predict the biodegradability upon (C+H)/L ratio or C/L ratio for the BMW during or after the MBT process, thereafter to predict the amount of BMW diverted by MBT in terms of anaerobic biogas potential; (2) The cellulose and hemicellulose contents or the (C+H)/L ratio of the untreated BMW (fresh mechanically pretreated BMW) were not found to correlate directly with biodegradability. This is consistent with the former findings on the specific waste components (untreated waste) by Eleazer et al. (1997) and Godley et al. (2005). It is suggested that untreated BMW and treated BMW need to be investigated separately in examining the relationships between relative fibre content and biodegradability.

Text
1132955.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (18MB)

More information

Published date: 2008

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 466415
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/466415
PURE UUID: b84abbf3-891c-4e9f-a19d-1cad736fb557

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Jul 2022 05:15
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 20:41

Export record

Contributors

Author: Bing Zheng

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×