The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Organisational stakeholders and alternative models of social responsibility and reporting

Organisational stakeholders and alternative models of social responsibility and reporting
Organisational stakeholders and alternative models of social responsibility and reporting

The papers here presented have a particular emphasis, within the totality of the accountability exercised by organisations towards the society in which they exist, upon the organisational legitimacy interpretation of the extant relationship.  This conceptualisation relies upon the assumption of a principal:agent relationship existing between society and business and suggests the former requires on-going evidence from the latter that it is behaving ‘responsibly’ i.e. doing those things of which society approves.  Such responsibility can be evidenced, as one method, by corporate social reporting and numerous suggestions are made as to how this might occur.  However, envisaged in this way the business:society relationship must be perceived as essentially reactive in nature, and the thesis therefore also considers the alternative, and far more proactive stance, suggested by a political economy (of accounting) formulation.  Suggestions as to how corporate executives might demonstrate their adherence to this alternative conceptualisation are hence also indicated.

Since "society" at the total level is considered to be a somewhat meaningless construct within a reporting framework, stakeholder analysis is employed to identify both the societal interest groups to whom an object organisation might be considered ‘accountable’, and the nature of (some at least of) the information regarding organisational activity that it might be deemed appropriate to then provide. In particular, amongst the stakeholders the thesis identifies and regarding which corporate reporting should occur, a cogent argument is mounted for the specific place of environmental reporting (meanwhile questioning the relevance of the ‘sustainability’ precept advocated elsewhere).

University of Southampton
Woodward, David Graham
f11bb9fa-12e3-40a1-ba35-78ae0ab31886
Woodward, David Graham
f11bb9fa-12e3-40a1-ba35-78ae0ab31886

Woodward, David Graham (2006) Organisational stakeholders and alternative models of social responsibility and reporting. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

The papers here presented have a particular emphasis, within the totality of the accountability exercised by organisations towards the society in which they exist, upon the organisational legitimacy interpretation of the extant relationship.  This conceptualisation relies upon the assumption of a principal:agent relationship existing between society and business and suggests the former requires on-going evidence from the latter that it is behaving ‘responsibly’ i.e. doing those things of which society approves.  Such responsibility can be evidenced, as one method, by corporate social reporting and numerous suggestions are made as to how this might occur.  However, envisaged in this way the business:society relationship must be perceived as essentially reactive in nature, and the thesis therefore also considers the alternative, and far more proactive stance, suggested by a political economy (of accounting) formulation.  Suggestions as to how corporate executives might demonstrate their adherence to this alternative conceptualisation are hence also indicated.

Since "society" at the total level is considered to be a somewhat meaningless construct within a reporting framework, stakeholder analysis is employed to identify both the societal interest groups to whom an object organisation might be considered ‘accountable’, and the nature of (some at least of) the information regarding organisational activity that it might be deemed appropriate to then provide. In particular, amongst the stakeholders the thesis identifies and regarding which corporate reporting should occur, a cogent argument is mounted for the specific place of environmental reporting (meanwhile questioning the relevance of the ‘sustainability’ precept advocated elsewhere).

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2006

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 466607
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/466607
PURE UUID: b58001a3-3695-4890-b8d4-dfcb1dc686ef

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Jul 2022 06:00
Last modified: 05 Jul 2022 06:00

Export record

Contributors

Author: David Graham Woodward

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×