The domination of minimum intervention : juvenile justice practice in England and Wales during the 1980s
The domination of minimum intervention : juvenile justice practice in England and Wales during the 1980s
Minimum intervention supporters predominantly question the value of the criminal justice system. Therefore, within a policy climate which highlights the importance of providing criminal policy answers rather than simply raising questions, the minimum intervention philosophy is highly vulnerable. However, the dissertation demonstrates that the minimum intervention philosophy can be critical for the improvement of the criminal justice process. This hidden aspect of minimum intervention is revealed from the analysis of the 1980s juvenile justice.
The reduction in the use of custody for juvenile offenders during the 1980s constitutes an important statistical fact which was left unexamined. The dissertation attempts to undertake a deeper examination from the perspective of the 1980s juvenile justice practice. The study demonstrates the existence of important trends directly associated with the performance of the practice level. The present work argues further, that the minimum intervention philosophy was at the heart of this era of change.
Chapter two reviews juvenile statistics from 1980 to 1990 and determines the existence of a transformation in the direction the 1980s juvenile justice. Chapter three considers the academic influence as this constitutes a significant part of the history of the 1980s juvenile justice. Chapter four unearths the existence of significant developments in the quality and the content of practitioners’ professional performance during the 1980s. Chapter five examines the contribution of the influential academic group as well as the contribution of the so-called ‘national network’ to these developments. Chapter six argues that the cycle of practice development was the critical process behind the emergence of a new practice working philosophy. Chapter seven argues about the emergence of minimum intervention at the practice level and demonstrates its critical connection to the developments in practice working philosophy. Chapter eight questions the view of academic leadership behind the domination of minimum interventions; and highlights the need to look at the higher level of the criminal policy logic/agenda/rhetoric, during the 1980s.
University of Southampton
Santatzoglou, Sotirios
c73d3765-74e8-47bd-a771-5adbf2243c9e
2007
Santatzoglou, Sotirios
c73d3765-74e8-47bd-a771-5adbf2243c9e
Santatzoglou, Sotirios
(2007)
The domination of minimum intervention : juvenile justice practice in England and Wales during the 1980s.
University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
Minimum intervention supporters predominantly question the value of the criminal justice system. Therefore, within a policy climate which highlights the importance of providing criminal policy answers rather than simply raising questions, the minimum intervention philosophy is highly vulnerable. However, the dissertation demonstrates that the minimum intervention philosophy can be critical for the improvement of the criminal justice process. This hidden aspect of minimum intervention is revealed from the analysis of the 1980s juvenile justice.
The reduction in the use of custody for juvenile offenders during the 1980s constitutes an important statistical fact which was left unexamined. The dissertation attempts to undertake a deeper examination from the perspective of the 1980s juvenile justice practice. The study demonstrates the existence of important trends directly associated with the performance of the practice level. The present work argues further, that the minimum intervention philosophy was at the heart of this era of change.
Chapter two reviews juvenile statistics from 1980 to 1990 and determines the existence of a transformation in the direction the 1980s juvenile justice. Chapter three considers the academic influence as this constitutes a significant part of the history of the 1980s juvenile justice. Chapter four unearths the existence of significant developments in the quality and the content of practitioners’ professional performance during the 1980s. Chapter five examines the contribution of the influential academic group as well as the contribution of the so-called ‘national network’ to these developments. Chapter six argues that the cycle of practice development was the critical process behind the emergence of a new practice working philosophy. Chapter seven argues about the emergence of minimum intervention at the practice level and demonstrates its critical connection to the developments in practice working philosophy. Chapter eight questions the view of academic leadership behind the domination of minimum interventions; and highlights the need to look at the higher level of the criminal policy logic/agenda/rhetoric, during the 1980s.
Text
1233300.pdf
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 2007
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 466613
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/466613
PURE UUID: e3a3966b-c34c-4ff0-90cb-f1df12cbad86
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Jul 2022 06:02
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 20:48
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Sotirios Santatzoglou
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics