The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Robust optimal design using passive and active methods of vibration control

Robust optimal design using passive and active methods of vibration control
Robust optimal design using passive and active methods of vibration control

This thesis is concerned with the design of a lightweight cantilever structure to optimise the vibrational energy transmitted from the base to the end. The methods by which this is achieved are: i) the use of geometric redesign of the structure (passive optimisation), ii) the application of Active Vibration Control (AVC) techniques (active optimisation), iii) combinations of both passive and active methods. However, even though the nominal performance of a structure may be optimal, the sensitivity of the structure to small geometric perturbations (e.g., those representing manufacturing tolerances) also needs to be considered. For some optimal structures their performance deteriorates rapidly in the face of such perturbations, and a better solution may be a structure with a slightly worse performance but that is robust to such perturbations.

Optimised structures were designed using the methods outlined above. For passively optimised structures, good reductions in vibration transmission were achieved using both classical optimisation methods and genetic algorithms (GA). The structures attained using the classical methods were not all robust, to the extent that the nominal performance would not be realised in practice. Using GA, in general, it was found that the wider the frequency band over which the average performance was assessed, the more robust the structures produced. For active control, optimal actuator positions were sought to achieve the best reductions attainable using feedforward control. The control effect associated with an AVC system also needs to be considered when selecting an optimal solution, and as with the performance, the robustness in the face of geometric perturbations needs to be assessed. The choice of the parameter representing the vibration was also investigated and it was found that the choice of parameter can affect the success in reducing the physical vibration. Optimised structures were also produced using both passive and active methods, and the robustness of their performance and control effort evaluated. It was seen that the application of AVC with a geometrically optimised structure is more effective and more efficient than with the unoptimised structure.

University of Southampton
Anthony, David Keith
f43b2165-3f94-49c5-9ffc-68ef08c0d145
Anthony, David Keith
f43b2165-3f94-49c5-9ffc-68ef08c0d145

Anthony, David Keith (2000) Robust optimal design using passive and active methods of vibration control. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

This thesis is concerned with the design of a lightweight cantilever structure to optimise the vibrational energy transmitted from the base to the end. The methods by which this is achieved are: i) the use of geometric redesign of the structure (passive optimisation), ii) the application of Active Vibration Control (AVC) techniques (active optimisation), iii) combinations of both passive and active methods. However, even though the nominal performance of a structure may be optimal, the sensitivity of the structure to small geometric perturbations (e.g., those representing manufacturing tolerances) also needs to be considered. For some optimal structures their performance deteriorates rapidly in the face of such perturbations, and a better solution may be a structure with a slightly worse performance but that is robust to such perturbations.

Optimised structures were designed using the methods outlined above. For passively optimised structures, good reductions in vibration transmission were achieved using both classical optimisation methods and genetic algorithms (GA). The structures attained using the classical methods were not all robust, to the extent that the nominal performance would not be realised in practice. Using GA, in general, it was found that the wider the frequency band over which the average performance was assessed, the more robust the structures produced. For active control, optimal actuator positions were sought to achieve the best reductions attainable using feedforward control. The control effect associated with an AVC system also needs to be considered when selecting an optimal solution, and as with the performance, the robustness in the face of geometric perturbations needs to be assessed. The choice of the parameter representing the vibration was also investigated and it was found that the choice of parameter can affect the success in reducing the physical vibration. Optimised structures were also produced using both passive and active methods, and the robustness of their performance and control effort evaluated. It was seen that the application of AVC with a geometrically optimised structure is more effective and more efficient than with the unoptimised structure.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2000

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 467009
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/467009
PURE UUID: ede56540-663b-4c5e-bf76-372395cbdc6b

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Jul 2022 08:07
Last modified: 05 Jul 2022 08:07

Export record

Contributors

Author: David Keith Anthony

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×