The effect of overshadowing bias on individual decision making and referral pathways
The effect of overshadowing bias on individual decision making and referral pathways
Research has presented diagnostic overshadowing as a robust cognitive bias, which alters clinicians’ diagnosis and treatment recommendations for individuals with learning disability and concurrent mental health problem. It refers to the tendency of clinicians to overlook a comorbid condition in the face of a more salient condition such as learning disability, hearing impairment and life-limiting illness. Although the literature has focused on the clinical realm, the overshadowing bias may equally be applied to the non-clinical sphere, where decisions are commonly made about individuals who may present with concurrent conditions. This thesis has two main aims:
Firstly it will review the existing diagnostic overshadowing literature. The strengths and weaknesses of this research will be considered and the validity of the bias assessed. Future research direction will be considered.
Secondly, it will empirically test the validity of the overshadowing bias by: assessing the effect manipulation of methodology has on overshadowing; exploring the generalisability of overshadowing for a non-clinical population making decisions about children with Asperger Syndrome and concurrent challenging behaviour; and finally exploring the relationship between overshadowing and cognitive complexity and causal attributions.
University of Southampton
Lewendon, Jane
b3dc4604-45f3-475c-b698-b421a9dfe805
2004
Lewendon, Jane
b3dc4604-45f3-475c-b698-b421a9dfe805
Lewendon, Jane
(2004)
The effect of overshadowing bias on individual decision making and referral pathways.
University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
Research has presented diagnostic overshadowing as a robust cognitive bias, which alters clinicians’ diagnosis and treatment recommendations for individuals with learning disability and concurrent mental health problem. It refers to the tendency of clinicians to overlook a comorbid condition in the face of a more salient condition such as learning disability, hearing impairment and life-limiting illness. Although the literature has focused on the clinical realm, the overshadowing bias may equally be applied to the non-clinical sphere, where decisions are commonly made about individuals who may present with concurrent conditions. This thesis has two main aims:
Firstly it will review the existing diagnostic overshadowing literature. The strengths and weaknesses of this research will be considered and the validity of the bias assessed. Future research direction will be considered.
Secondly, it will empirically test the validity of the overshadowing bias by: assessing the effect manipulation of methodology has on overshadowing; exploring the generalisability of overshadowing for a non-clinical population making decisions about children with Asperger Syndrome and concurrent challenging behaviour; and finally exploring the relationship between overshadowing and cognitive complexity and causal attributions.
Text
951382.pdf
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 2004
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 467045
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/467045
PURE UUID: 70cd491d-38eb-4e5a-88ac-0abfffc49791
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Jul 2022 08:10
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 20:57
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Jane Lewendon
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics