Attentional and interpretive biases in clinical depression
Attentional and interpretive biases in clinical depression
This thesis is concerned with cognitive biases in depression, with particular focus on attentional and interpretive biases. It reviews cognitive theories of depression, such as those of Beck (1976) and Bower (1981), who predicted that depressed individuals will selectively attend to negative information and will show an enhanced tendency to impose negative interpretations on ambiguous information. In contrast, Williams, Watts, MacLeod, and Mathews (1997) argue that depression is more strongly associated with a bias for negative information in memory, and that depression is not associated with an attentional bias. The methodologies developed for assessing attentional and interpretive bias are described, and research into these biases in depression are reviewed. More recently, attentional bias has been considered in relation to the differing attentional processes of shift, hold and disengagement. It has been suggested that depression may be associated with difficulties in disengaging attention from negative information. Evidence of attentional and interpretive biases in depression is mixed, and further research is required, particularly using clinically depressed samples.
The empirical study examined attentional and interpretive biases in clinically depressed participants and non-depressed controls. The study used: (a) an attentional cueing task, (b) a homophone task, and (c) a morphed faces task. It was predicted that an attentional bias for negative information, and a negative interpretive bias for ambiguous information, would be found in clinically depressed participants. Neither of these predictions was supported. While the present study did not detect attentional and interpretive biases in depression, these biases may be found in future research using different methodologies.
University of Southampton
Parnham-Ormandy, Lynda
9b5bae1f-4107-4ddb-816b-260d654be567
2004
Parnham-Ormandy, Lynda
9b5bae1f-4107-4ddb-816b-260d654be567
Parnham-Ormandy, Lynda
(2004)
Attentional and interpretive biases in clinical depression.
University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
This thesis is concerned with cognitive biases in depression, with particular focus on attentional and interpretive biases. It reviews cognitive theories of depression, such as those of Beck (1976) and Bower (1981), who predicted that depressed individuals will selectively attend to negative information and will show an enhanced tendency to impose negative interpretations on ambiguous information. In contrast, Williams, Watts, MacLeod, and Mathews (1997) argue that depression is more strongly associated with a bias for negative information in memory, and that depression is not associated with an attentional bias. The methodologies developed for assessing attentional and interpretive bias are described, and research into these biases in depression are reviewed. More recently, attentional bias has been considered in relation to the differing attentional processes of shift, hold and disengagement. It has been suggested that depression may be associated with difficulties in disengaging attention from negative information. Evidence of attentional and interpretive biases in depression is mixed, and further research is required, particularly using clinically depressed samples.
The empirical study examined attentional and interpretive biases in clinically depressed participants and non-depressed controls. The study used: (a) an attentional cueing task, (b) a homophone task, and (c) a morphed faces task. It was predicted that an attentional bias for negative information, and a negative interpretive bias for ambiguous information, would be found in clinically depressed participants. Neither of these predictions was supported. While the present study did not detect attentional and interpretive biases in depression, these biases may be found in future research using different methodologies.
Text
951392.pdf
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 2004
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 467089
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/467089
PURE UUID: 6367956d-43d6-4a72-9951-96841b8aada1
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Jul 2022 08:11
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 20:58
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Lynda Parnham-Ormandy
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics