The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Information processing biases in emotional disorders

Information processing biases in emotional disorders
Information processing biases in emotional disorders

The thesis focuses on interpretation biases in depression. Three cognitive models are drawn upon to examine how information processing biases differ between emotional states. In depression, individuals show biases in memory for negative information when strategic, elaborate cognitive processing occurs. In anxiety disorders, there appears to be an initial (automatic) attentional bias to threatening information. These differences in processing may contribute to the development and maintenance of emotional disorders. However, the literature examining interpretation biases has been criticised for introducing response bias and experimental demand effects in the methodologies. Whilst it appears that interpretation biases occur in anxious states, this does not appear to occur in depressed states when using more sophisticated methodologies. The paper comments on ways this could be researched further. Clinical implications for and against an interpretation bias occurring in depression are proposed.

The empirical study tested the hypothesis that clinically depressed individuals will interpret ambiguous material negatively when using a design that removes response bias and experimental demand effects. Although the results show a negative interpretation bias on a homophone task, this bias does not appear to occur when using a more sophisticated methodology.

University of Southampton
Bradbury, Katherine E
08f47470-134f-4015-96c6-c570d38497e7
Bradbury, Katherine E
08f47470-134f-4015-96c6-c570d38497e7

Bradbury, Katherine E (2001) Information processing biases in emotional disorders. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

The thesis focuses on interpretation biases in depression. Three cognitive models are drawn upon to examine how information processing biases differ between emotional states. In depression, individuals show biases in memory for negative information when strategic, elaborate cognitive processing occurs. In anxiety disorders, there appears to be an initial (automatic) attentional bias to threatening information. These differences in processing may contribute to the development and maintenance of emotional disorders. However, the literature examining interpretation biases has been criticised for introducing response bias and experimental demand effects in the methodologies. Whilst it appears that interpretation biases occur in anxious states, this does not appear to occur in depressed states when using more sophisticated methodologies. The paper comments on ways this could be researched further. Clinical implications for and against an interpretation bias occurring in depression are proposed.

The empirical study tested the hypothesis that clinically depressed individuals will interpret ambiguous material negatively when using a design that removes response bias and experimental demand effects. Although the results show a negative interpretation bias on a homophone task, this bias does not appear to occur when using a more sophisticated methodology.

Text
815130.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (3MB)

More information

Published date: 2001

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 467119
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/467119
PURE UUID: 3f6b0669-f50a-4387-a548-dc8bb5d1078f

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Jul 2022 08:12
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 20:59

Export record

Contributors

Author: Katherine E Bradbury

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×