Information processing biases in social anxiety and social phobia
Information processing biases in social anxiety and social phobia
Information Processing Biases in Social Anxiety and Social Phobia Abstract The current thesis is comprised of a review of the literature pertaining to information processing biases in social anxiety, and an empirical paper investigating the predictions made regarding one of these biases, a bias in the focus of external attention. Following a general introduction to social phobia, the literature review explores cognitive models of anxiety and specific cognitive models of social anxiety and social phobia. Due to a wealth of previous research, the body of the review is focused on empirical research that has investigated one specific information processing bias in social anxiety, the allocation of attentional resources. Based on a critical evaluation of the current evidence base, unanswered questions in the literature are identified and suggestions for future research are proposed. The empirical paper focuses on the allocation of external attention in social anxiety, using eye movement technology. The study compares individuals high and low in social anxiety regarding attentional biases and the potential mechanisms underlying these biases. Results of the study indicate that individuals high in social anxiety have greater attentional biases towards emotional faces, and that an important mechanism underlying these biases may be a difficulty disengaging from emotional stimuli. The results of the current study are discussed in relation to current theoretical models and empirical research, and clinical implications of the study are considered. Keywords: Social Anxiety / Social Phobia, Attention Bias, Interpretation Bias
University of Southampton
Gamble, Caroline
be4d63d2-ae52-41ed-b6e5-11ba7d297f0f
2008
Gamble, Caroline
be4d63d2-ae52-41ed-b6e5-11ba7d297f0f
Gamble, Caroline
(2008)
Information processing biases in social anxiety and social phobia.
University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
Information Processing Biases in Social Anxiety and Social Phobia Abstract The current thesis is comprised of a review of the literature pertaining to information processing biases in social anxiety, and an empirical paper investigating the predictions made regarding one of these biases, a bias in the focus of external attention. Following a general introduction to social phobia, the literature review explores cognitive models of anxiety and specific cognitive models of social anxiety and social phobia. Due to a wealth of previous research, the body of the review is focused on empirical research that has investigated one specific information processing bias in social anxiety, the allocation of attentional resources. Based on a critical evaluation of the current evidence base, unanswered questions in the literature are identified and suggestions for future research are proposed. The empirical paper focuses on the allocation of external attention in social anxiety, using eye movement technology. The study compares individuals high and low in social anxiety regarding attentional biases and the potential mechanisms underlying these biases. Results of the study indicate that individuals high in social anxiety have greater attentional biases towards emotional faces, and that an important mechanism underlying these biases may be a difficulty disengaging from emotional stimuli. The results of the current study are discussed in relation to current theoretical models and empirical research, and clinical implications of the study are considered. Keywords: Social Anxiety / Social Phobia, Attention Bias, Interpretation Bias
Text
1219416.pdf
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 2008
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 467132
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/467132
PURE UUID: a0cb71e9-b792-4c98-92b8-2fea43930156
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Jul 2022 08:13
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 21:00
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Caroline Gamble
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics