Smoking and negative affect
Smoking and negative affect
Approximately 25 percent of adults in the United Kingdom smoke despite awareness of the significant health risks. There is much debate about why individuals continue to smoke (e.g. appetitive effects of nicotine, habitual behaviour). Many addicted individuals describe coping with negative affect as key reason for continued drug-use. A review of the literature suggests that negative affect is an important feature of smoking behaviour. However, there is a lack of theory driven reason that explores the underlying mechanisms which might moderate and maintain this relationship.
A recent model of addiction is able to account for many facets of the empirical evidence surrounding addictions and suggests some testable mechanisms which underlie dependence; namely, that negative affect will increase drug craving and bias selective attention towards drug-related cues (Baker, Piper, McCarthy, Majeskie and Fjore, 2004). Research was carried out to investigate whether negative affect in smokers would increase craving and attentional bias towards drug-related cues.
The present findings suggest that negative affect does increase craving and bias selective attention in favour of drug-cues. Furthermore, that biases in selective attention may occur specifically in the early stages of stimulus evaluation rather than in the maintenance of attention. There was some evidence of maintained attention to drug-related cues, however, this was related to smoking status (e.g. whether a smoker or non-smoker) rather than mood state. These findings suggest that different underlying processes may mediate the relationship between attentional bias for drug-related cues, smoking status and negative mood states. Further research is required to clarify this issue.
University of Southampton
Hudson, Laura
9f8fa109-61cb-4f92-acb9-0effd751a586
2005
Hudson, Laura
9f8fa109-61cb-4f92-acb9-0effd751a586
Hudson, Laura
(2005)
Smoking and negative affect.
University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
Approximately 25 percent of adults in the United Kingdom smoke despite awareness of the significant health risks. There is much debate about why individuals continue to smoke (e.g. appetitive effects of nicotine, habitual behaviour). Many addicted individuals describe coping with negative affect as key reason for continued drug-use. A review of the literature suggests that negative affect is an important feature of smoking behaviour. However, there is a lack of theory driven reason that explores the underlying mechanisms which might moderate and maintain this relationship.
A recent model of addiction is able to account for many facets of the empirical evidence surrounding addictions and suggests some testable mechanisms which underlie dependence; namely, that negative affect will increase drug craving and bias selective attention towards drug-related cues (Baker, Piper, McCarthy, Majeskie and Fjore, 2004). Research was carried out to investigate whether negative affect in smokers would increase craving and attentional bias towards drug-related cues.
The present findings suggest that negative affect does increase craving and bias selective attention in favour of drug-cues. Furthermore, that biases in selective attention may occur specifically in the early stages of stimulus evaluation rather than in the maintenance of attention. There was some evidence of maintained attention to drug-related cues, however, this was related to smoking status (e.g. whether a smoker or non-smoker) rather than mood state. These findings suggest that different underlying processes may mediate the relationship between attentional bias for drug-related cues, smoking status and negative mood states. Further research is required to clarify this issue.
Text
997666.pdf
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 2005
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 467133
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/467133
PURE UUID: 62918aeb-15ff-47aa-bc35-0387530f31fb
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Jul 2022 08:13
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 21:00
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Laura Hudson
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics