The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

"A functional analysis of the responses of care staff to challenging behaviour in people with intellectual disabilities"

"A functional analysis of the responses of care staff to challenging behaviour in people with intellectual disabilities"
"A functional analysis of the responses of care staff to challenging behaviour in people with intellectual disabilities"

The challenging behaviours of people with intellectual disabilities do not exist in isolation from the social environment. Dominant causal models in the literature suggest a role for the actions of paid staff in service environments in particular. Central to these models is the hypothesis that staff may inadvertently behave in ways that serve to maintain challenging behaviour. In two papers, this dissertation seeks to enhance current knowledge of those factors held to influence the behavioural responses of direct care staff to challenging behaviours: (i) staff beliefs about client challenging behaviour, and (ii) staff affective reactions to the behaviour.

The literature review paper provides a comprehensive account of research concerned with staff causal and intervention beliefs, negative emotional reactions and behavioural responses to challenging behaviour, with attention paid to pertinent methodological issues. The theoretical frameworks underpinning empirical enquiry are considered and, in particular, the empirical status of links between staff affect/cognition and actual caregiver behaviour is examined.

The empirical paper utilises an interactive computer simulation of self-injurious behaviour with the aim of providing experimental evidence about the impact of beliefs and emotions on actual behaviour in situ. Participants with greater behavioural beliefs and less negative affect engaged in more habilitative behaviour when caring for a self-injuring ‘child’. The results did not indicate any impact of either behaviourally inappropriate/inaccurate beliefs or raised negative affect on counter-habilitative staff behaviour likely to reinforce self-injury or other forms of challenging behaviour. A number of implications for research and clinical practice are discussed.

University of Southampton
Wain, Jonathan M
ce79f1f2-c035-4a1e-a214-a6121ef7f19e
Wain, Jonathan M
ce79f1f2-c035-4a1e-a214-a6121ef7f19e

Wain, Jonathan M (2006) "A functional analysis of the responses of care staff to challenging behaviour in people with intellectual disabilities". University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

The challenging behaviours of people with intellectual disabilities do not exist in isolation from the social environment. Dominant causal models in the literature suggest a role for the actions of paid staff in service environments in particular. Central to these models is the hypothesis that staff may inadvertently behave in ways that serve to maintain challenging behaviour. In two papers, this dissertation seeks to enhance current knowledge of those factors held to influence the behavioural responses of direct care staff to challenging behaviours: (i) staff beliefs about client challenging behaviour, and (ii) staff affective reactions to the behaviour.

The literature review paper provides a comprehensive account of research concerned with staff causal and intervention beliefs, negative emotional reactions and behavioural responses to challenging behaviour, with attention paid to pertinent methodological issues. The theoretical frameworks underpinning empirical enquiry are considered and, in particular, the empirical status of links between staff affect/cognition and actual caregiver behaviour is examined.

The empirical paper utilises an interactive computer simulation of self-injurious behaviour with the aim of providing experimental evidence about the impact of beliefs and emotions on actual behaviour in situ. Participants with greater behavioural beliefs and less negative affect engaged in more habilitative behaviour when caring for a self-injuring ‘child’. The results did not indicate any impact of either behaviourally inappropriate/inaccurate beliefs or raised negative affect on counter-habilitative staff behaviour likely to reinforce self-injury or other forms of challenging behaviour. A number of implications for research and clinical practice are discussed.

Text
1062985.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (2MB)

More information

Published date: 2006

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 467158
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/467158
PURE UUID: 05398b92-91b4-4354-8fb2-4a87830ecdd1

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Jul 2022 08:14
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 21:01

Export record

Contributors

Author: Jonathan M Wain

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×