Cognitive bias in Generalised Anxiety Disorder and its relationship with the effect of SSRI treatment
Cognitive bias in Generalised Anxiety Disorder and its relationship with the effect of SSRI treatment
 
  The literature review examines cognitive models of Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD) with particular reference to those proposed by Beck, Emery & Greenberger (1986) and Bower (1981). More recent cognitive theories of anxiety, such as those proposed by Williams, Watts, MacLeod and Mathews (1988, 1997) and Mogg & Bradley (1998) are also reviewed. These latter models suggest that either anxious mood is elicited by vigilance for threat stimuli (Williams et al., 1988, 1997) or that anxious individuals evaluate stimuli as threatening (Mogg & Bradley, 1998). The predictions made by these studies are examined by considering relevant empirical findings. The role of treatment in removing cognitive bias is also examined, and conclusions concerning the nature of cognitive bias in GAD are drawn.
 The empirical study contains two sections. The first section is a longitudinal study that examines whether the level of cognitive bias before treatment can be used as an index to predict the level of anxious mood following treatment with SSRI medication. This part of the study also examines whether medication alters cognitive bias. The results suggest that attentional bias is not a reliable predictor for the level of anxious mood following SSRI treatment, although a reduction in the level of interpretive bias was detected following SSRI treatment. The second part of the study, the cross-sectional part, examines whether there was a significant difference in the level of attentional and interpretive biases between the GAD group and a control group. The results suggest that there were significant differences in the level of interpretive bias between the two groups, but not in the level of attentional bias. These results are discussed and suggestions for further research are identified.
    University of Southampton
   
  
    
      Brodrick, Paul Matthew
      
        b9f7f066-0b27-4a44-9b52-d3f5506a3df7
      
     
  
  
   
  
  
    
      2002
    
    
  
  
    
      Brodrick, Paul Matthew
      
        b9f7f066-0b27-4a44-9b52-d3f5506a3df7
      
     
  
       
    
 
  
    
      
  
 
  
  
  
    Brodrick, Paul Matthew
  
  
  
  
   
    (2002)
  
  
    
    Cognitive bias in Generalised Anxiety Disorder and its relationship with the effect of SSRI treatment.
  University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.
  
   
  
    
      Record type:
      Thesis
      
      
      (Doctoral)
    
   
    
    
      
        
          Abstract
          The literature review examines cognitive models of Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD) with particular reference to those proposed by Beck, Emery & Greenberger (1986) and Bower (1981). More recent cognitive theories of anxiety, such as those proposed by Williams, Watts, MacLeod and Mathews (1988, 1997) and Mogg & Bradley (1998) are also reviewed. These latter models suggest that either anxious mood is elicited by vigilance for threat stimuli (Williams et al., 1988, 1997) or that anxious individuals evaluate stimuli as threatening (Mogg & Bradley, 1998). The predictions made by these studies are examined by considering relevant empirical findings. The role of treatment in removing cognitive bias is also examined, and conclusions concerning the nature of cognitive bias in GAD are drawn.
 The empirical study contains two sections. The first section is a longitudinal study that examines whether the level of cognitive bias before treatment can be used as an index to predict the level of anxious mood following treatment with SSRI medication. This part of the study also examines whether medication alters cognitive bias. The results suggest that attentional bias is not a reliable predictor for the level of anxious mood following SSRI treatment, although a reduction in the level of interpretive bias was detected following SSRI treatment. The second part of the study, the cross-sectional part, examines whether there was a significant difference in the level of attentional and interpretive biases between the GAD group and a control group. The results suggest that there were significant differences in the level of interpretive bias between the two groups, but not in the level of attentional bias. These results are discussed and suggestions for further research are identified.
         
      
      
        
          
            
  
    Text
 890933.pdf
     - Version of Record
   
  
  
    
  
 
          
            
          
            
           
            
           
        
        
       
    
   
  
  
  More information
  
    
      Published date: 2002
 
    
  
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
  
        Identifiers
        Local EPrints ID: 467162
        URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/467162
        
        
        
        
          PURE UUID: dc088be0-80d1-4f89-814f-1a0ff52a18c6
        
  
    
        
          
        
    
  
  Catalogue record
  Date deposited: 05 Jul 2022 08:14
  Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 21:01
  Export record
  
  
 
 
  
    
    
      Contributors
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              Paul Matthew Brodrick
            
          
        
      
      
      
    
  
   
  
    Download statistics
    
      Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
      
      View more statistics