The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Cognitive bias in Generalised Anxiety Disorder and its relationship with the effect of SSRI treatment

Cognitive bias in Generalised Anxiety Disorder and its relationship with the effect of SSRI treatment
Cognitive bias in Generalised Anxiety Disorder and its relationship with the effect of SSRI treatment

The literature review examines cognitive models of Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD) with particular reference to those proposed by Beck, Emery & Greenberger (1986) and Bower (1981). More recent cognitive theories of anxiety, such as those proposed by Williams, Watts, MacLeod and Mathews (1988, 1997) and Mogg & Bradley (1998) are also reviewed. These latter models suggest that either anxious mood is elicited by vigilance for threat stimuli (Williams et al., 1988, 1997) or that anxious individuals evaluate stimuli as threatening (Mogg & Bradley, 1998). The predictions made by these studies are examined by considering relevant empirical findings. The role of treatment in removing cognitive bias is also examined, and conclusions concerning the nature of cognitive bias in GAD are drawn.

The empirical study contains two sections. The first section is a longitudinal study that examines whether the level of cognitive bias before treatment can be used as an index to predict the level of anxious mood following treatment with SSRI medication. This part of the study also examines whether medication alters cognitive bias. The results suggest that attentional bias is not a reliable predictor for the level of anxious mood following SSRI treatment, although a reduction in the level of interpretive bias was detected following SSRI treatment. The second part of the study, the cross-sectional part, examines whether there was a significant difference in the level of attentional and interpretive biases between the GAD group and a control group. The results suggest that there were significant differences in the level of interpretive bias between the two groups, but not in the level of attentional bias. These results are discussed and suggestions for further research are identified.

University of Southampton
Brodrick, Paul Matthew
b9f7f066-0b27-4a44-9b52-d3f5506a3df7
Brodrick, Paul Matthew
b9f7f066-0b27-4a44-9b52-d3f5506a3df7

Brodrick, Paul Matthew (2002) Cognitive bias in Generalised Anxiety Disorder and its relationship with the effect of SSRI treatment. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

The literature review examines cognitive models of Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD) with particular reference to those proposed by Beck, Emery & Greenberger (1986) and Bower (1981). More recent cognitive theories of anxiety, such as those proposed by Williams, Watts, MacLeod and Mathews (1988, 1997) and Mogg & Bradley (1998) are also reviewed. These latter models suggest that either anxious mood is elicited by vigilance for threat stimuli (Williams et al., 1988, 1997) or that anxious individuals evaluate stimuli as threatening (Mogg & Bradley, 1998). The predictions made by these studies are examined by considering relevant empirical findings. The role of treatment in removing cognitive bias is also examined, and conclusions concerning the nature of cognitive bias in GAD are drawn.

The empirical study contains two sections. The first section is a longitudinal study that examines whether the level of cognitive bias before treatment can be used as an index to predict the level of anxious mood following treatment with SSRI medication. This part of the study also examines whether medication alters cognitive bias. The results suggest that attentional bias is not a reliable predictor for the level of anxious mood following SSRI treatment, although a reduction in the level of interpretive bias was detected following SSRI treatment. The second part of the study, the cross-sectional part, examines whether there was a significant difference in the level of attentional and interpretive biases between the GAD group and a control group. The results suggest that there were significant differences in the level of interpretive bias between the two groups, but not in the level of attentional bias. These results are discussed and suggestions for further research are identified.

Text
890933.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (4MB)

More information

Published date: 2002

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 467162
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/467162
PURE UUID: dc088be0-80d1-4f89-814f-1a0ff52a18c6

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Jul 2022 08:14
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 21:01

Export record

Contributors

Author: Paul Matthew Brodrick

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×