Film Buddhology
Film Buddhology
This thesis proposes Buddhology as a methodology for discussing film ontology. The mind in Buddhology provides a way to reconsider the essence of all phenomena. Considering that film is a palpable phenomenon, I suggest that the mind engages with film at a Buddhist ontological level. My overarching argument is that film ontology is nominal. Nominal film arises from my act of combining film ontology with the Buddhist idea of nominal existence, referring to an intermediate state between film (film exists) and “no film” (film does not exist). On the one hand, my thesis argues that film does not have an independent and inherent quality to enable itself to exist in its own right, but on the other hand, because audiences’ sense organs and sense consciousness together make the manifestation of film possible, it follows that film is not absolute nothingness. The framework of film Buddhology that I outline in my thesis is threefold. First, I will summarise some traditional approaches to and concepts in film ontology, such as phenomenology, realism, and cognitivism, in order to consider how other theorists analyse the nature of film. Second, I will put these theories into dialogue with Buddhist discussions concerning the association between phenomena and the mind in the context of film ontology, and examine the relation between film and the viewer’s act of experiencing film. Moreover, I will explain how the mind and its several subideas are selected from among many Buddhist sources. Third, I apply my ideas to specific case studies where each chosen film indicates a specific type of filmmaking. The selected examples are Michelangelo Antonioni’s art film Blow-up (1966), Hollis Frampton’s experimental film Zorns Lemma (1970), Abbas Kiarostami’s docufiction Through the Olive Trees (1994), and William Wyler’s classical Hollywood film The Best Years of Our Lives (1946). A Buddhist perspective on these films will trigger discussions about nominal images, nominal montage, nominal voices, and nominal deep-focus shots—manifold paths to the applicability of nominal film beyond any types of films.
University of Southampton
Chen, Ao
af42c515-a250-4312-9097-e1332fa0b475
June 2022
Chen, Ao
af42c515-a250-4312-9097-e1332fa0b475
Cook, Malcolm
e2e0ebaa-c791-48dc-8c67-86e6cbb40b75
Bergfelder, Tim
fb4e3b67-06fd-4b9f-9a94-bc73a1c7c16d
Carroll, Elizabeth
6589ba1a-368c-4f46-a296-8cdc47039123
Chen, Ao
(2022)
Film Buddhology.
University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 193pp.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
This thesis proposes Buddhology as a methodology for discussing film ontology. The mind in Buddhology provides a way to reconsider the essence of all phenomena. Considering that film is a palpable phenomenon, I suggest that the mind engages with film at a Buddhist ontological level. My overarching argument is that film ontology is nominal. Nominal film arises from my act of combining film ontology with the Buddhist idea of nominal existence, referring to an intermediate state between film (film exists) and “no film” (film does not exist). On the one hand, my thesis argues that film does not have an independent and inherent quality to enable itself to exist in its own right, but on the other hand, because audiences’ sense organs and sense consciousness together make the manifestation of film possible, it follows that film is not absolute nothingness. The framework of film Buddhology that I outline in my thesis is threefold. First, I will summarise some traditional approaches to and concepts in film ontology, such as phenomenology, realism, and cognitivism, in order to consider how other theorists analyse the nature of film. Second, I will put these theories into dialogue with Buddhist discussions concerning the association between phenomena and the mind in the context of film ontology, and examine the relation between film and the viewer’s act of experiencing film. Moreover, I will explain how the mind and its several subideas are selected from among many Buddhist sources. Third, I apply my ideas to specific case studies where each chosen film indicates a specific type of filmmaking. The selected examples are Michelangelo Antonioni’s art film Blow-up (1966), Hollis Frampton’s experimental film Zorns Lemma (1970), Abbas Kiarostami’s docufiction Through the Olive Trees (1994), and William Wyler’s classical Hollywood film The Best Years of Our Lives (1946). A Buddhist perspective on these films will trigger discussions about nominal images, nominal montage, nominal voices, and nominal deep-focus shots—manifold paths to the applicability of nominal film beyond any types of films.
Text
ID# 29214793 Ao Chen-Film Buddhology (Final Thesis)
- Version of Record
Text
ID# 29214793 Ao Chen-Permission to deposit thesis - form
Restricted to Repository staff only
More information
Published date: June 2022
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 467320
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/467320
PURE UUID: bb152135-c2bc-40c9-827a-ea25444a1ebd
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Jul 2022 16:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:43
Export record
Contributors
Thesis advisor:
Elizabeth Carroll
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics