The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Corrective feedback on practice tests can sometimes impair later test performance

Corrective feedback on practice tests can sometimes impair later test performance
Corrective feedback on practice tests can sometimes impair later test performance
Retrieval practice is generally good for long-term retention, but multiple-choice (MC) practice tests can introduce problems. For example, the lures gain familiarity during practice and can be erroneously endorsed on later tests (negative testing effect). In this talk, we describe a related problem caused not by lures, but by corrective feedback. Although normally good for learning, we have found that exposure to correct-answer feedback on MC practice tests increases the likelihood that the feedback is erroneously endorsed later on related final-test questions which have a different correct answer. However, at the same time, answering mul- tiple-choice questions during practice causes retrieval of accurate information about the options which opposes this bias. In a series of experiments, we explore the interplay of these opposing memory influences in both experimental and educational contexts. Depending on factors such as practice-test format, final-test format, the degree of false recognition, and the temporal proximity of related questions, final test performance can be facilitated or impaired. We discuss both the theoretical implications of these results as well as offering some practical recommendations.
Higham, Philip
4093b28f-7d58-4d18-89d4-021792e418e7
Alamri, Aeshah
a8757c26-2bb4-44fb-9207-977653524719
Higham, Philip
4093b28f-7d58-4d18-89d4-021792e418e7
Alamri, Aeshah
a8757c26-2bb4-44fb-9207-977653524719

Higham, Philip and Alamri, Aeshah (2021) Corrective feedback on practice tests can sometimes impair later test performance. 62nd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society.

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Other)

Abstract

Retrieval practice is generally good for long-term retention, but multiple-choice (MC) practice tests can introduce problems. For example, the lures gain familiarity during practice and can be erroneously endorsed on later tests (negative testing effect). In this talk, we describe a related problem caused not by lures, but by corrective feedback. Although normally good for learning, we have found that exposure to correct-answer feedback on MC practice tests increases the likelihood that the feedback is erroneously endorsed later on related final-test questions which have a different correct answer. However, at the same time, answering mul- tiple-choice questions during practice causes retrieval of accurate information about the options which opposes this bias. In a series of experiments, we explore the interplay of these opposing memory influences in both experimental and educational contexts. Depending on factors such as practice-test format, final-test format, the degree of false recognition, and the temporal proximity of related questions, final test performance can be facilitated or impaired. We discuss both the theoretical implications of these results as well as offering some practical recommendations.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2021
Venue - Dates: 62nd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, 2021-11-04

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 467532
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/467532
PURE UUID: 9f29570d-2a7c-4cb5-ac84-df1db043511b
ORCID for Philip Higham: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6087-7224

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Jul 2022 16:41
Last modified: 23 Feb 2023 02:43

Export record

Contributors

Author: Philip Higham ORCID iD
Author: Aeshah Alamri

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×