The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Dominant-negative synthesis suppression of voltage-gated calcium channel Cav2.2 induced by truncated constructs.

Dominant-negative synthesis suppression of voltage-gated calcium channel Cav2.2 induced by truncated constructs.
Dominant-negative synthesis suppression of voltage-gated calcium channel Cav2.2 induced by truncated constructs.
Voltage-gated calcium channel α1 subunits consist of four domains (I–IV), each with six transmembrane segments. A number of truncated isoforms have been identified to occur as a result of alternative splicing or mutation. We have examined the functional consequences for expression of full-length Cav2.2 (α1B) of its coexpression with truncated constructs of Cav2.2. Domains I-II or domains III-IV, when expressed individually, together with the accessory subunits β1b and α2δ-1, did not form functional channels. When they were coexpressed, low-density whole-cell currents and functional channels with properties similar to wild-type channels were observed. However, when domain I-II, domain III-IV, or domain I alone were coexpressed with full-length Cav2.2, they markedly suppressed its functional expression, although at the single channel level, when channels were recorded, there were no differences in their biophysical properties. Furthermore, when it was coexpressed with either domain I-II or domain I, the fluorescence of green fluorescent protein (GFP)–Cav2.2 and expression of Cav2.2 protein was almost abolished. Suppression does not involve sequestration of the Cavβ subunit, because loss of GFP–Cav2.2 expression also occurred in the absence of β subunit, and the effect of domain I-II or domain I could not be mimicked by the cytoplasmic I-II loop of Cav2.2. It requires transmembrane segments, because the isolated Cav2.2 N terminus did not have any effect. Our results indicate that the mechanism of suppression of Cav2.2 by truncated constructs containing domain I involves inhibition of channel synthesis, which may represent a role of endogenously expressed truncated Cav isoforms.
0270-6474
8495-8504
Raghib, Ayesha
25bb0ed3-611b-4f86-bc8f-69e378d59055
Bertaso, Federica
993473f5-29db-4078-ab87-5da121c8246f
Davies, Anthony
62b8c54a-f20f-4113-8ce2-9e03eea26afe
Page, Karen M.
ad9b7052-ef55-4865-b274-b2bdaa46bba3
Meir, Alon
eacbe488-f48d-4362-ba46-006eaeccf0e3
Bogdanov, Yuri
0c970999-e191-4f1b-90d9-7bf25a5d5b4b
Dolphin, Annette C.
43d0cb0b-f17c-4ca2-b099-894f11b51d6e
Raghib, Ayesha
25bb0ed3-611b-4f86-bc8f-69e378d59055
Bertaso, Federica
993473f5-29db-4078-ab87-5da121c8246f
Davies, Anthony
62b8c54a-f20f-4113-8ce2-9e03eea26afe
Page, Karen M.
ad9b7052-ef55-4865-b274-b2bdaa46bba3
Meir, Alon
eacbe488-f48d-4362-ba46-006eaeccf0e3
Bogdanov, Yuri
0c970999-e191-4f1b-90d9-7bf25a5d5b4b
Dolphin, Annette C.
43d0cb0b-f17c-4ca2-b099-894f11b51d6e

Raghib, Ayesha, Bertaso, Federica, Davies, Anthony, Page, Karen M., Meir, Alon, Bogdanov, Yuri and Dolphin, Annette C. (2001) Dominant-negative synthesis suppression of voltage-gated calcium channel Cav2.2 induced by truncated constructs. Journal of Neuroscience, 21 (11), 8495-8504. (doi:10.1523/jneurosci.21-21-08495.2001).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Voltage-gated calcium channel α1 subunits consist of four domains (I–IV), each with six transmembrane segments. A number of truncated isoforms have been identified to occur as a result of alternative splicing or mutation. We have examined the functional consequences for expression of full-length Cav2.2 (α1B) of its coexpression with truncated constructs of Cav2.2. Domains I-II or domains III-IV, when expressed individually, together with the accessory subunits β1b and α2δ-1, did not form functional channels. When they were coexpressed, low-density whole-cell currents and functional channels with properties similar to wild-type channels were observed. However, when domain I-II, domain III-IV, or domain I alone were coexpressed with full-length Cav2.2, they markedly suppressed its functional expression, although at the single channel level, when channels were recorded, there were no differences in their biophysical properties. Furthermore, when it was coexpressed with either domain I-II or domain I, the fluorescence of green fluorescent protein (GFP)–Cav2.2 and expression of Cav2.2 protein was almost abolished. Suppression does not involve sequestration of the Cavβ subunit, because loss of GFP–Cav2.2 expression also occurred in the absence of β subunit, and the effect of domain I-II or domain I could not be mimicked by the cytoplasmic I-II loop of Cav2.2. It requires transmembrane segments, because the isolated Cav2.2 N terminus did not have any effect. Our results indicate that the mechanism of suppression of Cav2.2 by truncated constructs containing domain I involves inhibition of channel synthesis, which may represent a role of endogenously expressed truncated Cav isoforms.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: November 2001

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 467713
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/467713
ISSN: 0270-6474
PURE UUID: da1a8825-c365-468f-8e47-5836e6183d76
ORCID for Yuri Bogdanov: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4667-5890

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Jul 2022 17:21
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:37

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Ayesha Raghib
Author: Federica Bertaso
Author: Anthony Davies
Author: Karen M. Page
Author: Alon Meir
Author: Yuri Bogdanov ORCID iD
Author: Annette C. Dolphin

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×