Federal loyalty and the 'nature' of Federalism
Federal loyalty and the 'nature' of Federalism
Is the federal loyalty principle — viz., each level of government in a federal system must make non-trivial efforts to ensure non-interference with the jurisdiction of the other — inherent to federalism? Despite controversy about the meaning and scope of ‘ federal loyalty,’ the claim that it is inherent to federalism has a transnational pedigree. If this ‘inherence claim’ is true, it could have substantial implications for global constitutionalism. Among other implications, it could help justify judicial recognition of federal loyalty in federal states that allow judicial review. Unfortunately for proponents of federal loyalty, however, any combination of plausible understandings of federalism and federal loyalty presents a similar kind of multi-lemma problem: One must deny the inherence claim, grant that it is trivial, deny that many paradigmatic federal systems are actually federal, or grant that federal loyalty relies on another underlying normative principle and somehow identify the principle despite no one being able to do so to date. In each case, denying the inherence claim is the best option. Federal states must decide whether to entrench federal loyalty requirements through regular amendment procedures.
Federalism, Constitutional Theory, Legal Philosophy, Legal Theory, Constitutional Law
207-240
Da Silva, Michael
05ad649f-8409-4012-8edc-88709b1a3182
16 July 2020
Da Silva, Michael
05ad649f-8409-4012-8edc-88709b1a3182
Da Silva, Michael
(2020)
Federal loyalty and the 'nature' of Federalism.
Review of Constitutional Studies, 24 (2), .
Abstract
Is the federal loyalty principle — viz., each level of government in a federal system must make non-trivial efforts to ensure non-interference with the jurisdiction of the other — inherent to federalism? Despite controversy about the meaning and scope of ‘ federal loyalty,’ the claim that it is inherent to federalism has a transnational pedigree. If this ‘inherence claim’ is true, it could have substantial implications for global constitutionalism. Among other implications, it could help justify judicial recognition of federal loyalty in federal states that allow judicial review. Unfortunately for proponents of federal loyalty, however, any combination of plausible understandings of federalism and federal loyalty presents a similar kind of multi-lemma problem: One must deny the inherence claim, grant that it is trivial, deny that many paradigmatic federal systems are actually federal, or grant that federal loyalty relies on another underlying normative principle and somehow identify the principle despite no one being able to do so to date. In each case, denying the inherence claim is the best option. Federal states must decide whether to entrench federal loyalty requirements through regular amendment procedures.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 16 July 2020
Keywords:
Federalism, Constitutional Theory, Legal Philosophy, Legal Theory, Constitutional Law
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 467946
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/467946
PURE UUID: 5a020d4a-82cf-42ff-855d-9b2e574e0eac
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 26 Jul 2022 16:40
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:12
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Michael Da Silva
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics