The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Gender, subjectivity and the writer’s voice: Historicising the French Resistance, 1940-1970s

Gender, subjectivity and the writer’s voice: Historicising the French Resistance, 1940-1970s
Gender, subjectivity and the writer’s voice: Historicising the French Resistance, 1940-1970s
From 1940 until the 1970s, resisters sought to preserve the resistance for posterity and thus dominated the historicisation of the resistance: under the Occupation they published clandestine newspapers, and from the Liberation onwards, they wrote histories, essays, memoirs and both collected and gave testimonies. This thesis argues that the interrelation between genre, gender and subjectivity was a key dynamic in this process. It demonstrates that the choice of genre affected what was said about the resistance and by whom. Through an exploration of genre, this thesis argues that that men were more likely to foreground their subjectivity, whereas women were more likely to marginalise their own subject position. Women were nevertheless actively involved within this process of historicisation, and this thesis argues that the genre of history allowed women to embrace their marginal position and to use it as an asset. This thesis shows how the production of testimonial sources for the Commission d’Histoire de l’Occupation et de la Libération de la France (CHOLF) project, which began in 1944, provided a space in which women made an important contribution to historical understandings of the resistance as both interviewer and interviewee. The paradox of women writing about the resistance but not about their own resistance is a central theme of this thesis, which draws on archival and published sources to argue that by embracing and adapting the traditional ‘female’ roles of remembering and memorialising from the margins, women became key participants in the historicisation of the French resistance. It explores the tensions between the reliance on subjective experience and the claim to have written ‘objective’, ‘scientific’ and yet also ‘authentic’ accounts of resistance life. Tracing the discourses to the 1970s shows how women’s resistance was increasingly understood as crucial to the resistance fight. Fundamentally, the thesis demonstrates that despite changes over time, women were central to the formation of the gendered narratives of resistance from the very beginning.
University of Southampton
Hooke, Emily
acf855f0-18d3-46f9-9b4e-947b9bedc381
Hooke, Emily
acf855f0-18d3-46f9-9b4e-947b9bedc381
Tumblety, Joan
8742e0ca-a9c0-4d16-832f-b3ef643efd7b
Gregor, Neil
ee3a0bc7-3779-4dd8-ad67-aad07359ca51

Hooke, Emily (2022) Gender, subjectivity and the writer’s voice: Historicising the French Resistance, 1940-1970s. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 341pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

From 1940 until the 1970s, resisters sought to preserve the resistance for posterity and thus dominated the historicisation of the resistance: under the Occupation they published clandestine newspapers, and from the Liberation onwards, they wrote histories, essays, memoirs and both collected and gave testimonies. This thesis argues that the interrelation between genre, gender and subjectivity was a key dynamic in this process. It demonstrates that the choice of genre affected what was said about the resistance and by whom. Through an exploration of genre, this thesis argues that that men were more likely to foreground their subjectivity, whereas women were more likely to marginalise their own subject position. Women were nevertheless actively involved within this process of historicisation, and this thesis argues that the genre of history allowed women to embrace their marginal position and to use it as an asset. This thesis shows how the production of testimonial sources for the Commission d’Histoire de l’Occupation et de la Libération de la France (CHOLF) project, which began in 1944, provided a space in which women made an important contribution to historical understandings of the resistance as both interviewer and interviewee. The paradox of women writing about the resistance but not about their own resistance is a central theme of this thesis, which draws on archival and published sources to argue that by embracing and adapting the traditional ‘female’ roles of remembering and memorialising from the margins, women became key participants in the historicisation of the French resistance. It explores the tensions between the reliance on subjective experience and the claim to have written ‘objective’, ‘scientific’ and yet also ‘authentic’ accounts of resistance life. Tracing the discourses to the 1970s shows how women’s resistance was increasingly understood as crucial to the resistance fight. Fundamentally, the thesis demonstrates that despite changes over time, women were central to the formation of the gendered narratives of resistance from the very beginning.

Text
Thesis with corrections no signature - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (3MB)
Text
Permission to deposit thesis - Emily Hooke signed[31]
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Published date: May 2022

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 468077
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/468077
PURE UUID: 2adf35eb-49c8-4f5b-a647-b3bec9522416

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Aug 2022 16:34
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 21:31

Export record

Contributors

Author: Emily Hooke
Thesis advisor: Joan Tumblety
Thesis advisor: Neil Gregor

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×