The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Reconceptualising patient-reported outcome measures as active components of specialist musculoskeletal care for back pain

Reconceptualising patient-reported outcome measures as active components of specialist musculoskeletal care for back pain
Reconceptualising patient-reported outcome measures as active components of specialist musculoskeletal care for back pain
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly utilised in routine specialist musculoskeletal care. Using the Medical Research Council’s guidance on developing and evaluating complex interventions, this thesis examined how the use of PROMs in specialist musculoskeletal care affects patients with low back pain and the mechanisms that underlie this relationship.
The early development phase consisted of a systematic review examining prior research and a theoretical review exploring the underlying concepts of PROMs. The literature indicates PROMs may have an influence throughout the treatment encounter, affecting patients through multiple processes: increasing clinicians’ knowledge of patients, facilitating interactions, enabling patient-centred care, monitoring, enhancing therapeutic relationships, improving patient satisfaction, and encouraging self-management.
In the feasibility phase, a mixed-methods study explored future study procedures and estimated recruitment. Despite PROMs being routinely used in musculoskeletal care, no participants completed all PROMs. From qualitative interviews, recommendations were made to improve patient and clinician engagement with PROMs and trial processes in the future evaluation phase.
The final evaluation phase involved a randomised-controlled trial and a mixed-method process evaluation. The trial found no significant impact of PROMs on back pain-related disability. However, the process evaluation highlighted a series of processes by which PROMs may influence patient outcomes. PROMs were found to have a role within patient-clinician interactions, with patient-centred communication viewed as a key component of care.
This thesis has contributed to knowledge on implementing PROMs in specialist musculoskeletal care, including the selection and timing of PROMs, administrative processes, and training for clinicians. It provides a valuable theoretical foundation to guide future research on the use of PROMs. PROMs were found to be a useful tool for chiropractors to communicate with patients. Further research should explore how PROMs can be used to support patient-centred communication and how this might influence patients’ outcomes, self-management behaviours, and satisfaction with care.
University of Southampton
Holmes, Michelle Marie
83deb057-57c5-48ec-a140-317676865ed8
Holmes, Michelle Marie
83deb057-57c5-48ec-a140-317676865ed8
Bishop, Felicity
1f5429c5-325f-4ac4-aae3-6ba85d079928
Hart, Claire
e3db9c72-f493-439c-a358-b3b482d55103
Newell, David
f1a21938-9604-4f10-aac2-bb19337a638e

Holmes, Michelle Marie (2022) Reconceptualising patient-reported outcome measures as active components of specialist musculoskeletal care for back pain. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 402pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly utilised in routine specialist musculoskeletal care. Using the Medical Research Council’s guidance on developing and evaluating complex interventions, this thesis examined how the use of PROMs in specialist musculoskeletal care affects patients with low back pain and the mechanisms that underlie this relationship.
The early development phase consisted of a systematic review examining prior research and a theoretical review exploring the underlying concepts of PROMs. The literature indicates PROMs may have an influence throughout the treatment encounter, affecting patients through multiple processes: increasing clinicians’ knowledge of patients, facilitating interactions, enabling patient-centred care, monitoring, enhancing therapeutic relationships, improving patient satisfaction, and encouraging self-management.
In the feasibility phase, a mixed-methods study explored future study procedures and estimated recruitment. Despite PROMs being routinely used in musculoskeletal care, no participants completed all PROMs. From qualitative interviews, recommendations were made to improve patient and clinician engagement with PROMs and trial processes in the future evaluation phase.
The final evaluation phase involved a randomised-controlled trial and a mixed-method process evaluation. The trial found no significant impact of PROMs on back pain-related disability. However, the process evaluation highlighted a series of processes by which PROMs may influence patient outcomes. PROMs were found to have a role within patient-clinician interactions, with patient-centred communication viewed as a key component of care.
This thesis has contributed to knowledge on implementing PROMs in specialist musculoskeletal care, including the selection and timing of PROMs, administrative processes, and training for clinicians. It provides a valuable theoretical foundation to guide future research on the use of PROMs. PROMs were found to be a useful tool for chiropractors to communicate with patients. Further research should explore how PROMs can be used to support patient-centred communication and how this might influence patients’ outcomes, self-management behaviours, and satisfaction with care.

Text
Michelle Holmes - Thesis Deposit [Unsigned] - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (5MB)
Text
Michelle Holmes - Permission to deposit thesis - form [Signed]
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Published date: 2022

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 468587
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/468587
PURE UUID: 9f36a3f5-4f87-43b4-914c-20f5bb9aeee8
ORCID for Felicity Bishop: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8737-6662
ORCID for Claire Hart: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2175-2474
ORCID for David Newell: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1462-3586

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 Aug 2022 16:41
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:48

Export record

Contributors

Thesis advisor: Felicity Bishop ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Claire Hart ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: David Newell ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×