The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The changing context of innovation management: A critique of the relevance of the stage-gate approach to current organizations

The changing context of innovation management: A critique of the relevance of the stage-gate approach to current organizations
The changing context of innovation management: A critique of the relevance of the stage-gate approach to current organizations

The stage-gate method was initially developed as a description of the new product development practices within high-performing firms. At its heart the concept is simple: and the flow of activity of a stage-gate includes project action, information generation, analysis and decision. Research has shown that the stage-gate method has been extremely successful in many contexts. The question of whether the approach is suitable for all projects in all situations is a principal faultline within the literature. Proponents argue that adaptations and evolutions of the stage approach enable it to be universally applied. This paper provides a critical review of the literature and we identify chronic limitations of stage-gate when evaluated against contemporary challenges, including VUCA (volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity), environment, digitization and open innovation. We remain critical about whether these contemporary currents are best approached by yet another reconfiguration of stage-gate building blocks. We argue that high uncertainty (caused by these currents) requires the flexibility to change fundamental elements of a project, including the underlying concept and the target market, which means that stage-gate is not well suited to innovation processes addressing these contemporary challenges. We propose a typology to show its suitability.

0810-9028
207 - 227
Trott, Paul
c27a18b4-0115-462d-80a7-d5897760492e
Baxter, David
a7d6ba3f-370f-493d-9202-218d5e6dfc54
Ellwood, Paul
044c2165-152f-48ea-8a2b-960a18251b56
van der Duin, Patrick
066882d4-0a52-4009-be37-0ef5eb33bfb1
Trott, Paul
c27a18b4-0115-462d-80a7-d5897760492e
Baxter, David
a7d6ba3f-370f-493d-9202-218d5e6dfc54
Ellwood, Paul
044c2165-152f-48ea-8a2b-960a18251b56
van der Duin, Patrick
066882d4-0a52-4009-be37-0ef5eb33bfb1

Trott, Paul, Baxter, David, Ellwood, Paul and van der Duin, Patrick (2022) The changing context of innovation management: A critique of the relevance of the stage-gate approach to current organizations. Prometheus, 38 (2), 207 - 227. (doi:10.13169/prometheus.38.2.0207).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The stage-gate method was initially developed as a description of the new product development practices within high-performing firms. At its heart the concept is simple: and the flow of activity of a stage-gate includes project action, information generation, analysis and decision. Research has shown that the stage-gate method has been extremely successful in many contexts. The question of whether the approach is suitable for all projects in all situations is a principal faultline within the literature. Proponents argue that adaptations and evolutions of the stage approach enable it to be universally applied. This paper provides a critical review of the literature and we identify chronic limitations of stage-gate when evaluated against contemporary challenges, including VUCA (volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity), environment, digitization and open innovation. We remain critical about whether these contemporary currents are best approached by yet another reconfiguration of stage-gate building blocks. We argue that high uncertainty (caused by these currents) requires the flexibility to change fundamental elements of a project, including the underlying concept and the target market, which means that stage-gate is not well suited to innovation processes addressing these contemporary challenges. We propose a typology to show its suitability.

Text
Trott-paper-June-2022-fn-ed - Accepted Manuscript
Download (1MB)
Text
PROMETHEUS_38_2_Baxter et al - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (977kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 19 July 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 30 August 2022
Published date: 30 August 2022
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Authors.

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 468604
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/468604
ISSN: 0810-9028
PURE UUID: f680c53f-8dcb-40af-b4d0-2f5e066e6fd2
ORCID for David Baxter: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1983-7786

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 Aug 2022 16:42
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:36

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Paul Trott
Author: David Baxter ORCID iD
Author: Paul Ellwood
Author: Patrick van der Duin

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×