The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Near field zones of quiet

Near field zones of quiet
Near field zones of quiet

This paper examines the consequences of driving a single secondary loudspeaker to cancel the pressure due to some primary source at a point in its near field. This simple technique has been applied to the sound field in a highly reverberant room to produce zones of quiet in the vicinity of the loudspeaker, which have diameters that are typically equal to one-tenth of the acoustic wavelength, within which the sound pressure level is attenuated by at least 10 dB. The principal advantage gained with this strategy over other active techniques for controlling the sound field in rooms is that the sound pressure level well away from the control point is largely unaffected, an increase of only a small fraction of one dB being typical. Such a loudspeaker-microphone configuration could be located, for example, in the head rests of cars or aeroplanes, or indeed anywhere where the listener is seated for significant lengths of time and subjected to high ambient noise levels such that auditory comfort may be disturbed. Measurements are presented of the near field quiet zone in a reverberant room at frequencies well above the Schroeder frequency. These experimental findings, which represent a space averaged result over source position, indicate good agreement with the simple theory developed in this paper. It is demonstrated theoretically that the diameter of the quiet zone formed at any arbitrary point and direction in the near field of the loudspeaker is numerically proportional to the specific acoustic impedance at that point and direction. In general terms, the 10 dB quiet zone is observed to increase as the diameter of the secondary loudspeaker increases and the microphone is moved increasingly further from the loudspeaker. Close to the loudspeaker the pressure due to the secondary source is predominantly governed by the directly radiated near field and so the quiet zone formed in this region is therefore insensitive to the nature of the primary sound field. This important feature makes it highly suitable for producing reductions in the sound pressure level within enclosed spaces at frequencies where the modal density is high such that global control strategies are rendered ineffective.

0022-460X
605-627
Joseph, P.
9c30491e-8464-4c9a-8723-2abc62bdf75d
Elliott, S. J.
721dc55c-8c3e-4895-b9c4-82f62abd3567
Nelson, P. A.
5c6f5cc9-ea52-4fe2-9edf-05d696b0c1a9
Joseph, P.
9c30491e-8464-4c9a-8723-2abc62bdf75d
Elliott, S. J.
721dc55c-8c3e-4895-b9c4-82f62abd3567
Nelson, P. A.
5c6f5cc9-ea52-4fe2-9edf-05d696b0c1a9

Joseph, P., Elliott, S. J. and Nelson, P. A. (1994) Near field zones of quiet. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 172 (5), 605-627. (doi:10.1006/jsvi.1994.1202).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This paper examines the consequences of driving a single secondary loudspeaker to cancel the pressure due to some primary source at a point in its near field. This simple technique has been applied to the sound field in a highly reverberant room to produce zones of quiet in the vicinity of the loudspeaker, which have diameters that are typically equal to one-tenth of the acoustic wavelength, within which the sound pressure level is attenuated by at least 10 dB. The principal advantage gained with this strategy over other active techniques for controlling the sound field in rooms is that the sound pressure level well away from the control point is largely unaffected, an increase of only a small fraction of one dB being typical. Such a loudspeaker-microphone configuration could be located, for example, in the head rests of cars or aeroplanes, or indeed anywhere where the listener is seated for significant lengths of time and subjected to high ambient noise levels such that auditory comfort may be disturbed. Measurements are presented of the near field quiet zone in a reverberant room at frequencies well above the Schroeder frequency. These experimental findings, which represent a space averaged result over source position, indicate good agreement with the simple theory developed in this paper. It is demonstrated theoretically that the diameter of the quiet zone formed at any arbitrary point and direction in the near field of the loudspeaker is numerically proportional to the specific acoustic impedance at that point and direction. In general terms, the 10 dB quiet zone is observed to increase as the diameter of the secondary loudspeaker increases and the microphone is moved increasingly further from the loudspeaker. Close to the loudspeaker the pressure due to the secondary source is predominantly governed by the directly radiated near field and so the quiet zone formed in this region is therefore insensitive to the nature of the primary sound field. This important feature makes it highly suitable for producing reductions in the sound pressure level within enclosed spaces at frequencies where the modal density is high such that global control strategies are rendered ineffective.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 19 May 1994
Additional Information: Copyright: Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 468656
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/468656
ISSN: 0022-460X
PURE UUID: 4ee8f189-1ca1-45de-9900-55849fe1d082
ORCID for P. A. Nelson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9563-3235

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Aug 2022 16:43
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:32

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×