The pains of hope: families of indeterminate sentenced prisoners and political campaigning by lay citizens
The pains of hope: families of indeterminate sentenced prisoners and political campaigning by lay citizens
This paper examines the politics of crime and insecurity as experienced ‘from below’. We draw on in-depth interviews with families of indeterminate-sentenced prisoners, and policy participants, in order to understand families’ experiences of their relative’s imprisonment under the discredited English Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentence and their public campaigning against it. We situate these experiences within broader structural trends, which we conceptualise as penal-familial assemblages. We argue that the experiences cause ‘pains of hope’ for families through a double liminality: first, due to the uncertainties caused by the indeterminate sentence, which brings neither closure nor release. Second, meaningful state action on campaigners’ demands remained elusive, with moments when change appeared close but ultimately remained just out of reach. In conclusion, we draw out the lessons from our study for analysing penal politics. We argue, in particular, for a humanistic recognition of the centrality, and the pains, of lay citizens’ efforts to seek to achieve progressive penal policy change.
1252–1269
Annison, Harry Michael John
91ee5a4a-811e-4b57-9fd4-df643465b2a1
Condry, Rachel
aa24a9ea-1b6c-4158-9909-ebbbfffd7374
16 September 2022
Annison, Harry Michael John
91ee5a4a-811e-4b57-9fd4-df643465b2a1
Condry, Rachel
aa24a9ea-1b6c-4158-9909-ebbbfffd7374
Annison, Harry Michael John and Condry, Rachel
(2022)
The pains of hope: families of indeterminate sentenced prisoners and political campaigning by lay citizens.
British Journal of Criminology, 62 (5), .
(doi:10.1093/bjc/azac039).
Abstract
This paper examines the politics of crime and insecurity as experienced ‘from below’. We draw on in-depth interviews with families of indeterminate-sentenced prisoners, and policy participants, in order to understand families’ experiences of their relative’s imprisonment under the discredited English Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentence and their public campaigning against it. We situate these experiences within broader structural trends, which we conceptualise as penal-familial assemblages. We argue that the experiences cause ‘pains of hope’ for families through a double liminality: first, due to the uncertainties caused by the indeterminate sentence, which brings neither closure nor release. Second, meaningful state action on campaigners’ demands remained elusive, with moments when change appeared close but ultimately remained just out of reach. In conclusion, we draw out the lessons from our study for analysing penal politics. We argue, in particular, for a humanistic recognition of the centrality, and the pains, of lay citizens’ efforts to seek to achieve progressive penal policy change.
Text
azac039
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 26 January 2022
Published date: 16 September 2022
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 468678
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/468678
ISSN: 0007-0955
PURE UUID: c906dfeb-f0b7-4064-9324-3eeb28caec6b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 22 Aug 2022 16:44
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:33
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Rachel Condry
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics