Improving the learning process in anatomy practical sessions of chiropractic program using e-learning tool
Improving the learning process in anatomy practical sessions of chiropractic program using e-learning tool
Background
To accommodate the increased number of students and shorter learning time, anatomy instructors are increasingly developing web-based learning resources that can fulfil program-specific anatomical learning objectives and replace existing learning environment of the anatomy laboratory sessions. The study evaluated the quantitative change in the performance score in gross anatomy by replacement of face-to-face demonstration with an e-learning tool in practical sessions of chiropractic program.
Materials & methods
This quasi-experimental one-group pre-test and post-test design was employed longitudinally in two consecutive cohorts of semester 2 students. Teacher-led demonstration was used for first two sessions. E-learning tool was used in the next two sessions. Structured OSPE-based pre-test and post-test were held before and after the sessions. Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test was used to find out percentage of students showing improvement in the post-test score. Pearson correlation coefficient between pre-test and post-test scores was also done. A short questionnaire assessed the use of e-learning tools by the students.
Results
The mean difference between the post-test and pre-test score was higher in e-learning tool-led practical sessions. In 2018 cohort, 85.4% and 83.3% of students and 2019 cohort, 95% of students secured higher scores in post-test in two sessions with e-learning tool. In 2018 cohort, 62% and 70% of students and 2019 cohort, 81% and 70% of students secured higher scores in post-test in two sessions with teacher-led demonstration. A lower R2 coefficient was observed between post-test and pre-test scores in sessions with e-learning tool. Perception analysis indicated that majority of students agreed about e-learning tool allowing them to revise identification of anatomical structures themselves.
Conclusion
The e-learning tool was able to raise the post-test score in a higher percentage of students, indicating improved learning process in practical sessions using e-learning tools. The study would motivate anatomy instructors to use web-based learning tools to identify structures during the laboratory sessions.
Mitra, Nilesh Kumar
55b51238-3176-4cb2-b85c-47141f18dc57
Aung, Htar Htar
52e3c419-1486-4500-8db3-bba5ae3fad9a
Kumari, Mangala
b1c1e6ab-59b0-41dd-8990-1e43508f7cc8
Perera, Joachim
c5c4ccbd-5574-43df-84e3-bb64106052fe
Sivakumar, Anupa
dcd6ba48-be1a-463d-a154-bdd67ce0ff86
Singh, Anudeep
093d5051-dc46-4b2b-b7cc-83c161a0922b
Devi Nadarajah, Vishna
d83c647d-40a1-4638-a69f-464b83154c8a
18 December 2021
Mitra, Nilesh Kumar
55b51238-3176-4cb2-b85c-47141f18dc57
Aung, Htar Htar
52e3c419-1486-4500-8db3-bba5ae3fad9a
Kumari, Mangala
b1c1e6ab-59b0-41dd-8990-1e43508f7cc8
Perera, Joachim
c5c4ccbd-5574-43df-84e3-bb64106052fe
Sivakumar, Anupa
dcd6ba48-be1a-463d-a154-bdd67ce0ff86
Singh, Anudeep
093d5051-dc46-4b2b-b7cc-83c161a0922b
Devi Nadarajah, Vishna
d83c647d-40a1-4638-a69f-464b83154c8a
Mitra, Nilesh Kumar, Aung, Htar Htar, Kumari, Mangala, Perera, Joachim, Sivakumar, Anupa, Singh, Anudeep and Devi Nadarajah, Vishna
(2021)
Improving the learning process in anatomy practical sessions of chiropractic program using e-learning tool.
Translational research in Anatomy, 23, [100100].
(doi:10.1016/j.tria.2020.100100).
Abstract
Background
To accommodate the increased number of students and shorter learning time, anatomy instructors are increasingly developing web-based learning resources that can fulfil program-specific anatomical learning objectives and replace existing learning environment of the anatomy laboratory sessions. The study evaluated the quantitative change in the performance score in gross anatomy by replacement of face-to-face demonstration with an e-learning tool in practical sessions of chiropractic program.
Materials & methods
This quasi-experimental one-group pre-test and post-test design was employed longitudinally in two consecutive cohorts of semester 2 students. Teacher-led demonstration was used for first two sessions. E-learning tool was used in the next two sessions. Structured OSPE-based pre-test and post-test were held before and after the sessions. Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test was used to find out percentage of students showing improvement in the post-test score. Pearson correlation coefficient between pre-test and post-test scores was also done. A short questionnaire assessed the use of e-learning tools by the students.
Results
The mean difference between the post-test and pre-test score was higher in e-learning tool-led practical sessions. In 2018 cohort, 85.4% and 83.3% of students and 2019 cohort, 95% of students secured higher scores in post-test in two sessions with e-learning tool. In 2018 cohort, 62% and 70% of students and 2019 cohort, 81% and 70% of students secured higher scores in post-test in two sessions with teacher-led demonstration. A lower R2 coefficient was observed between post-test and pre-test scores in sessions with e-learning tool. Perception analysis indicated that majority of students agreed about e-learning tool allowing them to revise identification of anatomical structures themselves.
Conclusion
The e-learning tool was able to raise the post-test score in a higher percentage of students, indicating improved learning process in practical sessions using e-learning tools. The study would motivate anatomy instructors to use web-based learning tools to identify structures during the laboratory sessions.
Text
1-s2.0-S2214854X2030039X-main
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 20 November 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 27 November 2020
Published date: 18 December 2021
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 468685
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/468685
PURE UUID: 93675a6c-b29c-46a8-9749-6d6f166bb0ca
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 22 Aug 2022 17:12
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 21:21
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Nilesh Kumar Mitra
Author:
Htar Htar Aung
Author:
Mangala Kumari
Author:
Joachim Perera
Author:
Anupa Sivakumar
Author:
Anudeep Singh
Author:
Vishna Devi Nadarajah
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics