The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Sound source characterisation: The focussed beamformer vs the inverse method

Sound source characterisation: The focussed beamformer vs the inverse method
Sound source characterisation: The focussed beamformer vs the inverse method
The current availability and affordability of multi-microphone array systems has awakened a strong interest in sound source location and characterisation in many fields of experimental acoustics. Although the theory behind the design of such arrays has been known for some time, the algorithms used to process the microphone signals are the subject of on-going research and development. The beamformer algorithm is well-known and relatively simple to implement. It is useful for 'scanning' an area to find the position of sound sources but has limited source characterisation capability. The inverse method, on the other hand, requires prior information on the position of sources, is harder to implement but can yield realistic source characterisation data. This paper details a comparison between the two methods based on experimental data. The inverse method is shown to perform better than the beam former when more than one source is present as the output from the beamformer is shown to be dependent upon the degree of coherence between multiple sources whereas that from the inverse method is not. It is demonstrated that both methods can be used effectively under reverberant conditions through the use of measured Green functions in place of the simple geometrically-derived free-space ones.
3499 - 3506
International Institute of Acoustics and Vibration
Holland, K.R.
90dd842b-e3c8-45bb-865e-3e7da77ec703
Nelson, P.A.
5c6f5cc9-ea52-4fe2-9edf-05d696b0c1a9
Holland, K.R.
90dd842b-e3c8-45bb-865e-3e7da77ec703
Nelson, P.A.
5c6f5cc9-ea52-4fe2-9edf-05d696b0c1a9

Holland, K.R. and Nelson, P.A. (2003) Sound source characterisation: The focussed beamformer vs the inverse method. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Congress on Sound and Vibration. International Institute of Acoustics and Vibration. 3499 - 3506 .

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

The current availability and affordability of multi-microphone array systems has awakened a strong interest in sound source location and characterisation in many fields of experimental acoustics. Although the theory behind the design of such arrays has been known for some time, the algorithms used to process the microphone signals are the subject of on-going research and development. The beamformer algorithm is well-known and relatively simple to implement. It is useful for 'scanning' an area to find the position of sound sources but has limited source characterisation capability. The inverse method, on the other hand, requires prior information on the position of sources, is harder to implement but can yield realistic source characterisation data. This paper details a comparison between the two methods based on experimental data. The inverse method is shown to perform better than the beam former when more than one source is present as the output from the beamformer is shown to be dependent upon the degree of coherence between multiple sources whereas that from the inverse method is not. It is demonstrated that both methods can be used effectively under reverberant conditions through the use of measured Green functions in place of the simple geometrically-derived free-space ones.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 10 July 2003

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 468706
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/468706
PURE UUID: b6f20f93-2e84-419f-9865-0d8a41e59748
ORCID for K.R. Holland: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7439-2375
ORCID for P.A. Nelson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9563-3235

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Aug 2022 16:48
Last modified: 07 Mar 2024 02:33

Export record

Contributors

Author: K.R. Holland ORCID iD
Author: P.A. Nelson ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×