The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Navigational space for the absence of sustainability assurance in China

Navigational space for the absence of sustainability assurance in China
Navigational space for the absence of sustainability assurance in China

Purpose: This case study presents a critical analysis of why and how corporate managers in China are reluctant to adopt sustainability reporting assurance (SRA) provided by externally independent third-party assurers, despite the fact that it is acknowledged as a value-adding activity globally. Design/methodology/approach: A longitudinal fieldwork case study was conducted from 2014 to 2019 in a Chinese central state-owned enterprise (CSOE), a pioneer in sustainability reporting practice since the mid-2000s, to collect first-hand empirical data on managerial perceptions of the adoption of external SRA. Semi-structured interviews with 25 managers involved in sustainability (reporting) practice were conducted. The interview data were triangulated with an analysis of archival documents and board meeting minutes pertaining to the undertakings of sustainability practices in the case study organization. Findings: Our empirical analysis suggests that while managers recognize the benefits of adopting external SRA in enhancing the legitimacy of sustainability accountability, they oppose SRA because of their deep-rooted allegiance to the dominant logic of sociopolitical stability in China. SRA is envisaged to risk the stability of the socialist ideology with which CSOEs are imbued. Therefore, any transformational approach to accepting a novel (foreign) practice must be molded to gain control and autonomy, thereby maintain the hegemony of stability logic. Instead of disregarding external verification, managers of our case SOE appear to harness sustainability reporting as a navigational space to engage in internally crafted alternative manners in order to resist the rationality of SRA. Originality/value: The empirical analysis presents a nuanced explanation as to why internal managers have hitherto been reluctant to embrace the embedding of independent assurance into the sustainability reporting process. Our prolonged fieldwork provides ample context-specific, intra-organizational evidence regarding the absence of SRA in Chinese CSOEs, which warrants more attention given their considerable presence in the global economy. In addition, the empirical analysis contributes to our understanding of the managerial capture of sustainability issues in a specific context of state capitalism and how organizations and individuals in an authoritarian regime interpret and respond to novel discourses derived from distinct institutional settings.

Sustainability Reporting Assurance; Socio-Political Stability Logic; Navigational Space; Resistance to Assurance, Case Study; Chinese CSOEs, Case study, Socio-political stability logic, Resistance to assurance, Chinese CSOEs, Navigational space, Sustainability reporting assurance
0951-3574
Hidayah, Nunung Nurul
f57c537d-8eec-4097-b209-d98a280469b1
Hidayah, Nunung Nurul
f57c537d-8eec-4097-b209-d98a280469b1

Hidayah, Nunung Nurul (2022) Navigational space for the absence of sustainability assurance in China. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, [10.1108/AAAJ-04-2020-4514]. (doi:10.1108/AAAJ-04-2020-4514).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Purpose: This case study presents a critical analysis of why and how corporate managers in China are reluctant to adopt sustainability reporting assurance (SRA) provided by externally independent third-party assurers, despite the fact that it is acknowledged as a value-adding activity globally. Design/methodology/approach: A longitudinal fieldwork case study was conducted from 2014 to 2019 in a Chinese central state-owned enterprise (CSOE), a pioneer in sustainability reporting practice since the mid-2000s, to collect first-hand empirical data on managerial perceptions of the adoption of external SRA. Semi-structured interviews with 25 managers involved in sustainability (reporting) practice were conducted. The interview data were triangulated with an analysis of archival documents and board meeting minutes pertaining to the undertakings of sustainability practices in the case study organization. Findings: Our empirical analysis suggests that while managers recognize the benefits of adopting external SRA in enhancing the legitimacy of sustainability accountability, they oppose SRA because of their deep-rooted allegiance to the dominant logic of sociopolitical stability in China. SRA is envisaged to risk the stability of the socialist ideology with which CSOEs are imbued. Therefore, any transformational approach to accepting a novel (foreign) practice must be molded to gain control and autonomy, thereby maintain the hegemony of stability logic. Instead of disregarding external verification, managers of our case SOE appear to harness sustainability reporting as a navigational space to engage in internally crafted alternative manners in order to resist the rationality of SRA. Originality/value: The empirical analysis presents a nuanced explanation as to why internal managers have hitherto been reluctant to embrace the embedding of independent assurance into the sustainability reporting process. Our prolonged fieldwork provides ample context-specific, intra-organizational evidence regarding the absence of SRA in Chinese CSOEs, which warrants more attention given their considerable presence in the global economy. In addition, the empirical analysis contributes to our understanding of the managerial capture of sustainability issues in a specific context of state capitalism and how organizations and individuals in an authoritarian regime interpret and respond to novel discourses derived from distinct institutional settings.

Text
Navigational Space for the Absence of Sustainability Assurance in China - Accepted Manuscript
Download (421kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 28 July 2022
e-pub ahead of print date: 3 October 2022
Published date: 3 October 2022
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited.
Keywords: Sustainability Reporting Assurance; Socio-Political Stability Logic; Navigational Space; Resistance to Assurance, Case Study; Chinese CSOEs, Case study, Socio-political stability logic, Resistance to assurance, Chinese CSOEs, Navigational space, Sustainability reporting assurance

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 468874
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/468874
ISSN: 0951-3574
PURE UUID: f59db389-a163-417b-bc8b-9026b6b68349
ORCID for Nunung Nurul Hidayah: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3178-4584

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 31 Aug 2022 16:33
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 07:26

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×