The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The prevalence and natural history of radiographic foot osteoarthritis and co-existing foot pain in a UK population-based cohort of older women

The prevalence and natural history of radiographic foot osteoarthritis and co-existing foot pain in a UK population-based cohort of older women
The prevalence and natural history of radiographic foot osteoarthritis and co-existing foot pain in a UK population-based cohort of older women
Introduction
The prevalence of foot osteoarthritis (OA) is less well understood than hip, knee and hand OA. The foot is undoubtedly more complex, and investigators have been challenged in defining which joints to investigate and by the need for improved methodological standardisation across studies. As such, the prevalence and natural history of osteoarthritis and the relevance of co-existing pain in the foot have not yet been widely explored. The aim of this thesis was to improve understanding of foot osteoarthritis by examining techniques used to define foot osteoarthritis and by description of the prevalence, distribution and natural history of radiographic foot osteoarthritis and co-existing foot pain in an established UK population-based cohort of women, ‘The Chingford 1000 Women Study’.

Methods
Study 1: The author (PMc) undertook training by an experienced radiographer in scoring foot osteoarthritis using a validated foot atlas (The La Trobe Foot Atlas). Employing archived foot radiographs (n = 20 paired feet) Chingford 1000 Women study: year 6, 1995) intra-rater reliability was established for five individual joints in both feet (percentage close agreement ranged from 47.6% to 85.7% for osteophytes and from 33.3% to 81% for joint space narrowing). Subsequently a sample of foot radiographs (n=218) that included all remaining participants in the Chingford 1000 Women Study who returned for the year ‘23’ visit (mean (SD) for age: 75.5 (5.1)) were scored. A range of prevalence estimates of osteoarthritis at the foot and individual joint level were examined that relate to discordance between different techniques of interpretation. The findings from this study supported the use of the La Trobe Foot Atlas (LFA) to identify foot osteoarthritis in existing current and historical radiographs of established large population cohorts.
Study 2: A cross-sectional study design was used in which returning participants at year ‘23’ (2013-2015) from the Chingford 1000 Women study were investigated for presence of radiographic foot osteoarthritis and co-existing foot pain. Presence of radiographic foot osteoarthritis was scored according to LFA and self-reported foot pain was primarily defined and assessed using the non-side specific question “have you ever had pain in your feet which has lasted one day or longer?”
Data from 332 women were included in this study. Of these 91.3% had radiographic foot osteoarthritis in any joint affecting either foot. When examining individual joints, the rank order of radiographic osteoarthritis was; 2nd cuneo-metatarsal joint (78.9%), 1st cuneo-metatarsal joint
University of Southampton
McQueen, Peter Luke
7d3e3eef-0eeb-4b9b-a3dd-8d36c2ac53ad
McQueen, Peter Luke
7d3e3eef-0eeb-4b9b-a3dd-8d36c2ac53ad
Bowen, Catherine
fd85c3c5-96d9-49b8-86c6-caa94e1a222b
Arden, Nigel
23af958d-835c-4d79-be54-4bbe4c68077f

McQueen, Peter Luke (2021) The prevalence and natural history of radiographic foot osteoarthritis and co-existing foot pain in a UK population-based cohort of older women. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 247pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Introduction
The prevalence of foot osteoarthritis (OA) is less well understood than hip, knee and hand OA. The foot is undoubtedly more complex, and investigators have been challenged in defining which joints to investigate and by the need for improved methodological standardisation across studies. As such, the prevalence and natural history of osteoarthritis and the relevance of co-existing pain in the foot have not yet been widely explored. The aim of this thesis was to improve understanding of foot osteoarthritis by examining techniques used to define foot osteoarthritis and by description of the prevalence, distribution and natural history of radiographic foot osteoarthritis and co-existing foot pain in an established UK population-based cohort of women, ‘The Chingford 1000 Women Study’.

Methods
Study 1: The author (PMc) undertook training by an experienced radiographer in scoring foot osteoarthritis using a validated foot atlas (The La Trobe Foot Atlas). Employing archived foot radiographs (n = 20 paired feet) Chingford 1000 Women study: year 6, 1995) intra-rater reliability was established for five individual joints in both feet (percentage close agreement ranged from 47.6% to 85.7% for osteophytes and from 33.3% to 81% for joint space narrowing). Subsequently a sample of foot radiographs (n=218) that included all remaining participants in the Chingford 1000 Women Study who returned for the year ‘23’ visit (mean (SD) for age: 75.5 (5.1)) were scored. A range of prevalence estimates of osteoarthritis at the foot and individual joint level were examined that relate to discordance between different techniques of interpretation. The findings from this study supported the use of the La Trobe Foot Atlas (LFA) to identify foot osteoarthritis in existing current and historical radiographs of established large population cohorts.
Study 2: A cross-sectional study design was used in which returning participants at year ‘23’ (2013-2015) from the Chingford 1000 Women study were investigated for presence of radiographic foot osteoarthritis and co-existing foot pain. Presence of radiographic foot osteoarthritis was scored according to LFA and self-reported foot pain was primarily defined and assessed using the non-side specific question “have you ever had pain in your feet which has lasted one day or longer?”
Data from 332 women were included in this study. Of these 91.3% had radiographic foot osteoarthritis in any joint affecting either foot. When examining individual joints, the rank order of radiographic osteoarthritis was; 2nd cuneo-metatarsal joint (78.9%), 1st cuneo-metatarsal joint

Text
PM MPhil Thesis December final version - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (4MB)
Text
Permission to deposit form - PMcQueen
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.

More information

Submitted date: 2019
Published date: 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 468930
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/468930
PURE UUID: bc47ca7a-5ef2-4f04-9252-893138c130b9
ORCID for Catherine Bowen: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7252-9515

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Sep 2022 16:51
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:53

Export record

Contributors

Author: Peter Luke McQueen
Thesis advisor: Catherine Bowen ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Nigel Arden

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×