The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain

A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain
A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain
Study Design: A systematic review of prospective cohort studies in low back pain.
Objectives: To evaluate the evidence implicating psychological factors in the development of chronicity in low back pain.
Summary of Background Data:
The biopsychosocial model is gaining acceptance in low back pain, and has provided a basis for screening measurements, guidelines and interventions; however, to date, the unique contribution of psychological factors in the transition from an acute presentation to chronicity has not been rigorously assessed.
Methods: A systematic literature search was followed by the application of three sets of criteria to each study: methodologic quality, quality of measurement of psychological factors, and quality of statistical analysis. Two reviewers blindly coded each study, followed by independent assessment by a statistician. Studies were divided into three environments: primary care settings, pain clinics, and workplace.
Results: Twenty-five publications (18 cohorts) included psychological factors at baseline. Six of these met acceptability criteria for methodology, psychological measurement, and statistical analysis. Increased risk of chronicity (persisting symptoms and/or disability) from psychological distress/depressive mood and, to a lesser extent, somatization emerged as the main findings. Acceptable evidence generally was not found for other psychological factors, although weak support emerged for the role of catastrophizing as a coping strategy.
Conclusion: Psychological factors (notably distress, depressive mood, and somatization) are implicated in the transition to chronic low back pain. The development and testing of clinical interventions specifically targeting these factors is indicated. In view of the importance attributed to other psychological factors (particularly coping strategies and fear avoidance) there is a need to clarify their role in back-related disability through rigorous prospective studies.
0362-2436
Pincus, Tamar
55388347-5d71-4fc0-9fd2-66fbba080e0c
Burton, A. Kim
b5f69408-9340-4599-8649-41b2ae0b6d38
Vogel, Steve
43454f80-c889-4d7b-b6e3-231ed7015c0f
Field, Andy P.
39da3be8-69d8-4e3a-bc91-63feabfe325a
Pincus, Tamar
55388347-5d71-4fc0-9fd2-66fbba080e0c
Burton, A. Kim
b5f69408-9340-4599-8649-41b2ae0b6d38
Vogel, Steve
43454f80-c889-4d7b-b6e3-231ed7015c0f
Field, Andy P.
39da3be8-69d8-4e3a-bc91-63feabfe325a

Pincus, Tamar, Burton, A. Kim, Vogel, Steve and Field, Andy P. (2002) A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain. Spine, 27 (5), [E109–E120].

Record type: Article

Abstract

Study Design: A systematic review of prospective cohort studies in low back pain.
Objectives: To evaluate the evidence implicating psychological factors in the development of chronicity in low back pain.
Summary of Background Data:
The biopsychosocial model is gaining acceptance in low back pain, and has provided a basis for screening measurements, guidelines and interventions; however, to date, the unique contribution of psychological factors in the transition from an acute presentation to chronicity has not been rigorously assessed.
Methods: A systematic literature search was followed by the application of three sets of criteria to each study: methodologic quality, quality of measurement of psychological factors, and quality of statistical analysis. Two reviewers blindly coded each study, followed by independent assessment by a statistician. Studies were divided into three environments: primary care settings, pain clinics, and workplace.
Results: Twenty-five publications (18 cohorts) included psychological factors at baseline. Six of these met acceptability criteria for methodology, psychological measurement, and statistical analysis. Increased risk of chronicity (persisting symptoms and/or disability) from psychological distress/depressive mood and, to a lesser extent, somatization emerged as the main findings. Acceptable evidence generally was not found for other psychological factors, although weak support emerged for the role of catastrophizing as a coping strategy.
Conclusion: Psychological factors (notably distress, depressive mood, and somatization) are implicated in the transition to chronic low back pain. The development and testing of clinical interventions specifically targeting these factors is indicated. In view of the importance attributed to other psychological factors (particularly coping strategies and fear avoidance) there is a need to clarify their role in back-related disability through rigorous prospective studies.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 March 2002
Additional Information: No DOI

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 468987
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/468987
ISSN: 0362-2436
PURE UUID: 33469a69-0d46-468f-9d9d-2b7bcf5fb1b8
ORCID for Tamar Pincus: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3172-5624

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 Sep 2022 19:09
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:11

Export record

Contributors

Author: Tamar Pincus ORCID iD
Author: A. Kim Burton
Author: Steve Vogel
Author: Andy P. Field

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×