The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A systematic review and meta-synthesis of the impact of low back pain on people's lives

A systematic review and meta-synthesis of the impact of low back pain on people's lives
A systematic review and meta-synthesis of the impact of low back pain on people's lives
BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is a common and costly problem that many interpret within a biopsychosocial model. There is renewed concern that core-sets of outcome measures do not capture what is important. To inform debate about the coverage of back pain outcome measure core-sets, and to suggest areas worthy of exploration within healthcare consultations, we have synthesised the qualitative literature on the impact of low back pain on people's lives.
METHODS: Two reviewers searched CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, PEDro, and Medline, identifying qualitative studies of people's experiences of non-specific LBP. Abstracted data were thematic coded and synthesised using a meta-ethnographic, and a meta-narrative approach.
RESULTS: We included 49 papers describing 42 studies. Patients are concerned with engagement in meaningful activities; but they also want to be believed and have their experiences and identity, as someone 'doing battle' with pain, validated. Patients seek diagnosis, treatment, and cure, but also reassurance of the absence of pathology. Some struggle to meet social expectations and obligations. When these are achieved, the credibility of their pain/disability claims can be jeopardised. Others withdraw, fearful of disapproval, or unable or unwilling to accommodate social demands. Patients generally seek to regain their pre-pain levels of health, and physical and emotional stability. After time, this can be perceived to become unrealistic and some adjust their expectations accordingly.
CONCLUSIONS: The social component of the biopsychosocial model is not well represented in current core-sets of outcome measures. Clinicians should appreciate that the broader impact of low back pain includes social factors; this may be crucial to improving patients' experiences of health care. Researchers should consider social factors to help develop a portfolio of more relevant outcome measures.
Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Cost of Illness, Emotions, Humans, Low Back Pain, Pain Measurement, Predictive Value of Tests, Quality of Life, Severity of Illness Index, Social Behavior, Surveys and Questionnaires
1471-2474
Froud, Robert
303169a8-8486-4e37-98f8-494c4be01dfd
Patterson, Sue
96525c7c-a239-49d6-9059-c01679fbe2b5
Eldridge, Sandra
0c937038-b04b-48d2-b55f-524fca308948
Seale, Clive
f4248edd-d736-4bba-82fc-d245cd8bc0a0
Pincus, Tamar
55388347-5d71-4fc0-9fd2-66fbba080e0c
Rajendran, Dévan
6d4ee340-f483-4c9c-8cab-a835ae08eb7d
Fossum, Christian
11a1f32c-542e-4b41-8e43-a5b471bed85c
Underwood, Martin
239a8609-e7b5-4acb-aaf9-9e7f717f0d62
Froud, Robert
303169a8-8486-4e37-98f8-494c4be01dfd
Patterson, Sue
96525c7c-a239-49d6-9059-c01679fbe2b5
Eldridge, Sandra
0c937038-b04b-48d2-b55f-524fca308948
Seale, Clive
f4248edd-d736-4bba-82fc-d245cd8bc0a0
Pincus, Tamar
55388347-5d71-4fc0-9fd2-66fbba080e0c
Rajendran, Dévan
6d4ee340-f483-4c9c-8cab-a835ae08eb7d
Fossum, Christian
11a1f32c-542e-4b41-8e43-a5b471bed85c
Underwood, Martin
239a8609-e7b5-4acb-aaf9-9e7f717f0d62

Froud, Robert, Patterson, Sue, Eldridge, Sandra, Seale, Clive, Pincus, Tamar, Rajendran, Dévan, Fossum, Christian and Underwood, Martin (2014) A systematic review and meta-synthesis of the impact of low back pain on people's lives. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 15, [50]. (doi:10.1186/1471-2474-15-50).

Record type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is a common and costly problem that many interpret within a biopsychosocial model. There is renewed concern that core-sets of outcome measures do not capture what is important. To inform debate about the coverage of back pain outcome measure core-sets, and to suggest areas worthy of exploration within healthcare consultations, we have synthesised the qualitative literature on the impact of low back pain on people's lives.
METHODS: Two reviewers searched CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, PEDro, and Medline, identifying qualitative studies of people's experiences of non-specific LBP. Abstracted data were thematic coded and synthesised using a meta-ethnographic, and a meta-narrative approach.
RESULTS: We included 49 papers describing 42 studies. Patients are concerned with engagement in meaningful activities; but they also want to be believed and have their experiences and identity, as someone 'doing battle' with pain, validated. Patients seek diagnosis, treatment, and cure, but also reassurance of the absence of pathology. Some struggle to meet social expectations and obligations. When these are achieved, the credibility of their pain/disability claims can be jeopardised. Others withdraw, fearful of disapproval, or unable or unwilling to accommodate social demands. Patients generally seek to regain their pre-pain levels of health, and physical and emotional stability. After time, this can be perceived to become unrealistic and some adjust their expectations accordingly.
CONCLUSIONS: The social component of the biopsychosocial model is not well represented in current core-sets of outcome measures. Clinicians should appreciate that the broader impact of low back pain includes social factors; this may be crucial to improving patients' experiences of health care. Researchers should consider social factors to help develop a portfolio of more relevant outcome measures.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 21 February 2014
Keywords: Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Cost of Illness, Emotions, Humans, Low Back Pain, Pain Measurement, Predictive Value of Tests, Quality of Life, Severity of Illness Index, Social Behavior, Surveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 468990
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/468990
ISSN: 1471-2474
PURE UUID: 29184467-ee3b-4d04-9363-f50b0783cf4c
ORCID for Tamar Pincus: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3172-5624

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 Sep 2022 19:10
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:11

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Robert Froud
Author: Sue Patterson
Author: Sandra Eldridge
Author: Clive Seale
Author: Tamar Pincus ORCID iD
Author: Dévan Rajendran
Author: Christian Fossum
Author: Martin Underwood

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×