The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A continuum of physics-based lithium-ion battery models reviewed

A continuum of physics-based lithium-ion battery models reviewed
A continuum of physics-based lithium-ion battery models reviewed
Physics-based electrochemical battery models derived from porous electrode theory are a very powerful tool for understanding lithium-ion batteries, as well as for improving their design and management. Different model fidelity, and thus model complexity, is needed for different applications. For example, in battery design we can afford longer computational times and the use of powerful computers, while for real-time battery control (e.g. in electric vehicles) we need to perform very fast calculations using simple devices. For this reason, simplified models that retain most of the features at a lower computational cost are widely used. Even though in the literature we often find these simplified models posed independently, leading to inconsistencies between models, they can actually be derived from more complicated models using a unified and systematic framework. In this review, we showcase this reductive framework, starting from a high-fidelity microscale model and reducing it all the way down to the single particle model, deriving in the process other common models, such as the Doyle–Fuller–Newman model. We also provide a critical discussion on the advantages and shortcomings of each of the models, which can aid model selection for a particular application. Finally, we provide an overview of possible extensions to the models, with a special focus on thermal models. Any of these extensions could be incorporated into the microscale model and the reductive framework re-applied to lead to a new generation of simplified, multi-physics models.
Doyle-Fuller-Newman (DFN), degradation models, lithium-ion batteries, mathematical modelling, physics-based models, single particle model (SPM), thermal models
2516-1083
Brosa Planella, Ferran
0de1c8ac-2bd4-48f5-a04a-fdfbddcaac3e
Ai, Weilong
d2d2152e-34f6-4521-895b-c31c80e2319a
Ghosh, Abir
689d22a9-cd4b-43c0-87fb-8a2795d13553
Boyce, Adam
4a000d6a-684e-4fb9-aafc-e265840c58c5
Korotkin, Ivan
1ca96363-075e-41d9-a0c1-153c8c0cc31a
Sahu, Smita
2225facd-5549-438f-801e-fa7ff4250989
Sulzer, Valentin
5636b2ba-e43e-4aef-9d7a-9790385f3945
Timms, Robert
346e1aec-c849-4bb6-aefb-1bd269df2c19
Tranter, Tom
df07cca3-5341-47e8-b7a5-06efbc8bffa8
Zyskin, Maxim
5bc5a8cc-6a0a-4660-82fd-fe92bb2d6217
Cooper, Sam
3cdff7eb-def6-426c-a137-ab2270d07e20
Edge, Jacqueline
b1cb9137-7ce6-43f3-81b1-60f1252b587b
Foster, Jamie
01f279d5-c69b-489b-b7a6-6f84feb9d9a2
Marinescu, Monica
13ce16ef-0ab1-42da-8f27-523f3b8d0360
Wu, Billy
f59e9fe9-2994-4864-b9e8-831bcf1cd389
Richardson, Giles
3fd8e08f-e615-42bb-a1ff-3346c5847b91
et al.
Brosa Planella, Ferran
0de1c8ac-2bd4-48f5-a04a-fdfbddcaac3e
Ai, Weilong
d2d2152e-34f6-4521-895b-c31c80e2319a
Ghosh, Abir
689d22a9-cd4b-43c0-87fb-8a2795d13553
Boyce, Adam
4a000d6a-684e-4fb9-aafc-e265840c58c5
Korotkin, Ivan
1ca96363-075e-41d9-a0c1-153c8c0cc31a
Sahu, Smita
2225facd-5549-438f-801e-fa7ff4250989
Sulzer, Valentin
5636b2ba-e43e-4aef-9d7a-9790385f3945
Timms, Robert
346e1aec-c849-4bb6-aefb-1bd269df2c19
Tranter, Tom
df07cca3-5341-47e8-b7a5-06efbc8bffa8
Zyskin, Maxim
5bc5a8cc-6a0a-4660-82fd-fe92bb2d6217
Cooper, Sam
3cdff7eb-def6-426c-a137-ab2270d07e20
Edge, Jacqueline
b1cb9137-7ce6-43f3-81b1-60f1252b587b
Foster, Jamie
01f279d5-c69b-489b-b7a6-6f84feb9d9a2
Marinescu, Monica
13ce16ef-0ab1-42da-8f27-523f3b8d0360
Wu, Billy
f59e9fe9-2994-4864-b9e8-831bcf1cd389
Richardson, Giles
3fd8e08f-e615-42bb-a1ff-3346c5847b91

Brosa Planella, Ferran, Ai, Weilong, Ghosh, Abir, Korotkin, Ivan and Richardson, Giles , et al. (2022) A continuum of physics-based lithium-ion battery models reviewed. Progress in Energy, 4 (4), [042003]. (doi:10.1088/2516-1083/ac7d31).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Physics-based electrochemical battery models derived from porous electrode theory are a very powerful tool for understanding lithium-ion batteries, as well as for improving their design and management. Different model fidelity, and thus model complexity, is needed for different applications. For example, in battery design we can afford longer computational times and the use of powerful computers, while for real-time battery control (e.g. in electric vehicles) we need to perform very fast calculations using simple devices. For this reason, simplified models that retain most of the features at a lower computational cost are widely used. Even though in the literature we often find these simplified models posed independently, leading to inconsistencies between models, they can actually be derived from more complicated models using a unified and systematic framework. In this review, we showcase this reductive framework, starting from a high-fidelity microscale model and reducing it all the way down to the single particle model, deriving in the process other common models, such as the Doyle–Fuller–Newman model. We also provide a critical discussion on the advantages and shortcomings of each of the models, which can aid model selection for a particular application. Finally, we provide an overview of possible extensions to the models, with a special focus on thermal models. Any of these extensions could be incorporated into the microscale model and the reductive framework re-applied to lead to a new generation of simplified, multi-physics models.

Text
Prog_Energy_BrosaPlanella2022 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 29 June 2022
Published date: 1 October 2022
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd.
Keywords: Doyle-Fuller-Newman (DFN), degradation models, lithium-ion batteries, mathematical modelling, physics-based models, single particle model (SPM), thermal models

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 469097
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/469097
ISSN: 2516-1083
PURE UUID: 9c92921d-2400-43fc-8336-118bf9e7b31f
ORCID for Ivan Korotkin: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5023-3684
ORCID for Giles Richardson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6225-8590

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Sep 2022 18:47
Last modified: 06 Jun 2024 02:04

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Ferran Brosa Planella
Author: Weilong Ai
Author: Abir Ghosh
Author: Adam Boyce
Author: Ivan Korotkin ORCID iD
Author: Smita Sahu
Author: Valentin Sulzer
Author: Robert Timms
Author: Tom Tranter
Author: Maxim Zyskin
Author: Sam Cooper
Author: Jacqueline Edge
Author: Jamie Foster
Author: Monica Marinescu
Author: Billy Wu
Corporate Author: et al.

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×