The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Attitudes to back pain amongst musculoskeletal practitioners: a comparison of professional groups and practice settings using the ABS-mp

Attitudes to back pain amongst musculoskeletal practitioners: a comparison of professional groups and practice settings using the ABS-mp
Attitudes to back pain amongst musculoskeletal practitioners: a comparison of professional groups and practice settings using the ABS-mp
Chiropractors, osteopaths and physiotherapists play key roles in the management of low back pain (LBP) patients in the UK. We investigated the attitudes of these three professional groups to back pain using a recently developed and validated questionnaire, the Attitudes to Back Pain Scale for musculoskeletal practitioners (ABS-mp). A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was sent to 300 of each professional group (n = 900). Responses were analysed from 465 practitioners: 132 chiropractors (28%), 159 osteopaths (34%) and 174 physio therapists (37%). Overall, all three groups endorse a psychosocial approach to treatment, and see re-activation as a primary goal. However, physiotherapists and osteopaths tend to endorse attitudes towards limiting the number of treatment sessions offered to LBP patients more than chiropractors, and chiropractors endorse a more biomedical approach than physio therapists. When practice setting (NHS versus private practice) was considered (in physiotherapists alone), physiotherapists working for the NHS endorsed limiting the number of treatment sessions more than those working in the private sector and would also less frequently advise their patients to restrict activities and be vigilant. The results may help explain current clinical practice patterns observed in these groups and their uptake of clinical guideline recommendations.
attitudes, back pain, chiropractors, osteopaths, physiotherapists, HEALTH-CARE PROVIDERS, OSTEOPATHIC PRACTICE, SPINAL MANIPULATION, PHYSICAL TREATMENTS, MANAGEMENT, BELIEFS, UK, PHYSIOTHERAPISTS, QUESTIONNAIRE, THERAPY
1356-689X
167-175
Pincus, Tamar
55388347-5d71-4fc0-9fd2-66fbba080e0c
Foster, Nadine E.
2ca79c15-6ada-4b99-982c-f8abee19e628
Vogel, Steven
a9e25ead-dcfd-40ae-9756-b3c68c7252fc
Santos, Rita
567ec108-91f6-4d44-9d78-9229819a6732
Breen, Alan
8227c8aa-a9d2-49e3-94c6-7fd7b12e1313
Underwood, Martin
239a8609-e7b5-4acb-aaf9-9e7f717f0d62
Pincus, Tamar
55388347-5d71-4fc0-9fd2-66fbba080e0c
Foster, Nadine E.
2ca79c15-6ada-4b99-982c-f8abee19e628
Vogel, Steven
a9e25ead-dcfd-40ae-9756-b3c68c7252fc
Santos, Rita
567ec108-91f6-4d44-9d78-9229819a6732
Breen, Alan
8227c8aa-a9d2-49e3-94c6-7fd7b12e1313
Underwood, Martin
239a8609-e7b5-4acb-aaf9-9e7f717f0d62

Pincus, Tamar, Foster, Nadine E., Vogel, Steven, Santos, Rita, Breen, Alan and Underwood, Martin (2007) Attitudes to back pain amongst musculoskeletal practitioners: a comparison of professional groups and practice settings using the ABS-mp. Manual Therapy, 12 (2), 167-175. (doi:10.1016/j.math.2006.06.005).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Chiropractors, osteopaths and physiotherapists play key roles in the management of low back pain (LBP) patients in the UK. We investigated the attitudes of these three professional groups to back pain using a recently developed and validated questionnaire, the Attitudes to Back Pain Scale for musculoskeletal practitioners (ABS-mp). A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was sent to 300 of each professional group (n = 900). Responses were analysed from 465 practitioners: 132 chiropractors (28%), 159 osteopaths (34%) and 174 physio therapists (37%). Overall, all three groups endorse a psychosocial approach to treatment, and see re-activation as a primary goal. However, physiotherapists and osteopaths tend to endorse attitudes towards limiting the number of treatment sessions offered to LBP patients more than chiropractors, and chiropractors endorse a more biomedical approach than physio therapists. When practice setting (NHS versus private practice) was considered (in physiotherapists alone), physiotherapists working for the NHS endorsed limiting the number of treatment sessions more than those working in the private sector and would also less frequently advise their patients to restrict activities and be vigilant. The results may help explain current clinical practice patterns observed in these groups and their uptake of clinical guideline recommendations.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 2 June 2006
Published date: 1 May 2007
Keywords: attitudes, back pain, chiropractors, osteopaths, physiotherapists, HEALTH-CARE PROVIDERS, OSTEOPATHIC PRACTICE, SPINAL MANIPULATION, PHYSICAL TREATMENTS, MANAGEMENT, BELIEFS, UK, PHYSIOTHERAPISTS, QUESTIONNAIRE, THERAPY

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 469119
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/469119
ISSN: 1356-689X
PURE UUID: e3f1fa45-12f4-424f-8597-8d3a6608aa61
ORCID for Tamar Pincus: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3172-5624

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Sep 2022 20:25
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:11

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Tamar Pincus ORCID iD
Author: Nadine E. Foster
Author: Steven Vogel
Author: Rita Santos
Author: Alan Breen
Author: Martin Underwood

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×