The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Randomized trial within a trial of yellow 'post-it notes' did not improve questionnaire response rates among participants in a trial of treatments for neck pain

Randomized trial within a trial of yellow 'post-it notes' did not improve questionnaire response rates among participants in a trial of treatments for neck pain
Randomized trial within a trial of yellow 'post-it notes' did not improve questionnaire response rates among participants in a trial of treatments for neck pain

Rationale Attrition is a threat to the validity of randomized trials. Few randomized studies have been conducted within randomized trials to test methods of reducing attrition. Aim To test whether using yellow post-it notes on follow-up questionnaires in the ATLAS treatment trial for neck pain reduces attrition. Method Nested trial within a trial. ATLAS participants were randomized to have their 6-month follow-up questionnaire have a 3′ yellow post-it note with a handwritten message encouraging return of questionnaire. Results 499 participants were independently randomized using simple allocation to receive the post-it notes or not. Two hundred fifteen of the 256 (84.0%) participants in the intervention group returned their questionnaire compared with 205 of the 243 (84.4%) in the control group. There was no difference in time to response. Conclusion Yellow post-it notes do not enhance questionnaire return rates for participants in a randomized trial of neck pain.

attrition, questionnaire response rates, trial within a trial
1356-1294
202-204
Tilbrook, Helen E.
b6338a94-ad8f-4353-b864-2b99e3496de4
Becque, Taeko
ecd1b4d5-4db8-4442-81c2-04aa291cf2fd
Buckley, Hannah
96804233-8edb-4296-92cc-868bf0622c61
Macpherson, Hugh
6485cd22-1dc3-4600-9e00-d3187e981663
Bailey, Mathew
58ec93d2-2b68-4e64-924c-c50417472d2c
Torgerson, David J.
2b48b54a-4cc1-4833-864f-5b3d1b9fbc66
Tilbrook, Helen E.
b6338a94-ad8f-4353-b864-2b99e3496de4
Becque, Taeko
ecd1b4d5-4db8-4442-81c2-04aa291cf2fd
Buckley, Hannah
96804233-8edb-4296-92cc-868bf0622c61
Macpherson, Hugh
6485cd22-1dc3-4600-9e00-d3187e981663
Bailey, Mathew
58ec93d2-2b68-4e64-924c-c50417472d2c
Torgerson, David J.
2b48b54a-4cc1-4833-864f-5b3d1b9fbc66

Tilbrook, Helen E., Becque, Taeko, Buckley, Hannah, Macpherson, Hugh, Bailey, Mathew and Torgerson, David J. (2015) Randomized trial within a trial of yellow 'post-it notes' did not improve questionnaire response rates among participants in a trial of treatments for neck pain. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 21 (2), 202-204. (doi:10.1111/jep.12284).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Rationale Attrition is a threat to the validity of randomized trials. Few randomized studies have been conducted within randomized trials to test methods of reducing attrition. Aim To test whether using yellow post-it notes on follow-up questionnaires in the ATLAS treatment trial for neck pain reduces attrition. Method Nested trial within a trial. ATLAS participants were randomized to have their 6-month follow-up questionnaire have a 3′ yellow post-it note with a handwritten message encouraging return of questionnaire. Results 499 participants were independently randomized using simple allocation to receive the post-it notes or not. Two hundred fifteen of the 256 (84.0%) participants in the intervention group returned their questionnaire compared with 205 of the 243 (84.4%) in the control group. There was no difference in time to response. Conclusion Yellow post-it notes do not enhance questionnaire return rates for participants in a randomized trial of neck pain.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 April 2015
Keywords: attrition, questionnaire response rates, trial within a trial

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 469224
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/469224
ISSN: 1356-1294
PURE UUID: 957e99f6-621f-4594-bb60-56214bb7304e
ORCID for Taeko Becque: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0362-3794

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Sep 2022 16:41
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:33

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Helen E. Tilbrook
Author: Taeko Becque ORCID iD
Author: Hannah Buckley
Author: Hugh Macpherson
Author: Mathew Bailey
Author: David J. Torgerson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×