Measuring troublesomeness of chronic pain by location
Measuring troublesomeness of chronic pain by location
Background: Current measures of pain assess the relative contribution of pain in different body regions to the overall impact of pain. We developed a series of questions to measure the relative 'troublesomeness' of pain in different body regions ( the "troublesomeness grid"). The study aimed to determine whether the "troublesomeness grid" is an appropriate measure to assess the severity of pain in different body regions, allowing the comparative severity of pain in different body regions to be assessed.Methods: We used data from a pilot for a population survey of pain ( N = 205) and from the population survey itself ( N = 2504) to assess the 'troublesomeness grid's performance. Specifically, its face and content validity using overall and item non-completion rates; its criterion related validity by exploring the relationship between troublesomeness and standard measures of pain, disability, distress and health utility for the five body regions most commonly affected by chronic pain; and its reliability and reproducibility in a test/re-test study.Results: The troublesomeness grid appeared to have good face validity as it had good completion rates. It also appeared to have good content validity as the percentage agreement between the grid and the pain manikin was high ( over 90%). In terms of criterion related validity, troublesomeness was most strongly correlated with pain intensity and health related quality of life, but less with disability and distress. The test-retest reliability was between 80% and 90% for the majority of body regions examined.Conclusion: The troublesomeness grid is well completed and appears to be an appropriate tool to assess the comparative severity of pain in different body regions.
LOW-BACK-PAIN, PRIMARY-CARE, QUESTIONNAIRE
Parsons, Suzanne
7dba4c5c-90bb-4df7-a61b-734649fedb49
Carnes, Dawn
bd9800b7-b0aa-46f0-b7f0-bcff5f8f0326
Pincus, Tamar
55388347-5d71-4fc0-9fd2-66fbba080e0c
Foster, Nadine
2ca79c15-6ada-4b99-982c-f8abee19e628
Breen, A
8227c8aa-a9d2-49e3-94c6-7fd7b12e1313
Vogel, Steven
a9e25ead-dcfd-40ae-9756-b3c68c7252fc
Underwood, M
239a8609-e7b5-4acb-aaf9-9e7f717f0d62
5 April 2006
Parsons, Suzanne
7dba4c5c-90bb-4df7-a61b-734649fedb49
Carnes, Dawn
bd9800b7-b0aa-46f0-b7f0-bcff5f8f0326
Pincus, Tamar
55388347-5d71-4fc0-9fd2-66fbba080e0c
Foster, Nadine
2ca79c15-6ada-4b99-982c-f8abee19e628
Breen, A
8227c8aa-a9d2-49e3-94c6-7fd7b12e1313
Vogel, Steven
a9e25ead-dcfd-40ae-9756-b3c68c7252fc
Underwood, M
239a8609-e7b5-4acb-aaf9-9e7f717f0d62
Parsons, Suzanne, Carnes, Dawn, Pincus, Tamar, Foster, Nadine, Breen, A, Vogel, Steven and Underwood, M
(2006)
Measuring troublesomeness of chronic pain by location.
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 7, [34].
(doi:10.1186/1471-2474-7-34).
Abstract
Background: Current measures of pain assess the relative contribution of pain in different body regions to the overall impact of pain. We developed a series of questions to measure the relative 'troublesomeness' of pain in different body regions ( the "troublesomeness grid"). The study aimed to determine whether the "troublesomeness grid" is an appropriate measure to assess the severity of pain in different body regions, allowing the comparative severity of pain in different body regions to be assessed.Methods: We used data from a pilot for a population survey of pain ( N = 205) and from the population survey itself ( N = 2504) to assess the 'troublesomeness grid's performance. Specifically, its face and content validity using overall and item non-completion rates; its criterion related validity by exploring the relationship between troublesomeness and standard measures of pain, disability, distress and health utility for the five body regions most commonly affected by chronic pain; and its reliability and reproducibility in a test/re-test study.Results: The troublesomeness grid appeared to have good face validity as it had good completion rates. It also appeared to have good content validity as the percentage agreement between the grid and the pain manikin was high ( over 90%). In terms of criterion related validity, troublesomeness was most strongly correlated with pain intensity and health related quality of life, but less with disability and distress. The test-retest reliability was between 80% and 90% for the majority of body regions examined.Conclusion: The troublesomeness grid is well completed and appears to be an appropriate tool to assess the comparative severity of pain in different body regions.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 5 April 2006
Keywords:
LOW-BACK-PAIN, PRIMARY-CARE, QUESTIONNAIRE
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 469233
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/469233
ISSN: 1471-2474
PURE UUID: 9f39b5eb-4b49-45c0-96e5-885b7a0b8546
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 09 Sep 2022 16:44
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:11
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Suzanne Parsons
Author:
Dawn Carnes
Author:
Tamar Pincus
Author:
Nadine Foster
Author:
A Breen
Author:
Steven Vogel
Author:
M Underwood
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics