The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Diagnostic uncertainty, guilt, mood, and disability in back pain

Diagnostic uncertainty, guilt, mood, and disability in back pain
Diagnostic uncertainty, guilt, mood, and disability in back pain
Objective: In the majority of patients a definitive cause for low back pain (LBP) cannot be established, and many patients report feeling uncertain about their diagnosis, accompanied by guilt. The relationship between diagnostic uncertainty, guilt, mood, and disability is currently unknown. This study tested 3 theoretical models to explore possible pathways between these factors. In Model 1, diagnostic uncertainty was hypothesized to correlate with pain-related guilt, which in turn would positively correlate with depression, anxiety and disability. Two alternative models were tested: (a) a path from depression and anxiety to guilt, from guilt to diagnostic uncertainty, and finally to disability; (b) a model in which depression and anxiety, and independently, diagnostic uncertainty, were associated with guilt, which in turn was associated with disability. Method: Structural equation modeling was employed on data from 413 participants with chronic LBP. Results: All 3 models showed a reasonable-to-good fit with the data, with the 2 alternative models providing marginally better fit indices. Guilt, and especially social guilt, was associated with disability in all 3 models. Diagnostic uncertainty was associated with guilt, but only moderately. Low mood was also associated with guilt. Conclusions: Two newly defined factors, pain related guilt and diagnostic uncertainty, appear to be linked to disability and mood in people with LBP. The causal path of these links cannot be established in this cross sectional study. However, pain-related guilt especially appears to be important, and future research should examine whether interventions directly targeting guilt improve outcomes.
0278-6133
50-59
Serbic, Danijela
9b108bdc-52dd-4374-9aed-1f57991c92df
Pincus, Tamar
55388347-5d71-4fc0-9fd2-66fbba080e0c
Fife-Schaw, Chris
0396dae8-1cb2-4b4b-b1da-2ccd137e3565
Dawson, Helen
df0f514a-ca73-4dc2-aa41-d5856b4a168e
Serbic, Danijela
9b108bdc-52dd-4374-9aed-1f57991c92df
Pincus, Tamar
55388347-5d71-4fc0-9fd2-66fbba080e0c
Fife-Schaw, Chris
0396dae8-1cb2-4b4b-b1da-2ccd137e3565
Dawson, Helen
df0f514a-ca73-4dc2-aa41-d5856b4a168e

Serbic, Danijela, Pincus, Tamar, Fife-Schaw, Chris and Dawson, Helen (2016) Diagnostic uncertainty, guilt, mood, and disability in back pain. Health Psychology, 35 (1), 50-59. (doi:10.1037/hea0000272).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: In the majority of patients a definitive cause for low back pain (LBP) cannot be established, and many patients report feeling uncertain about their diagnosis, accompanied by guilt. The relationship between diagnostic uncertainty, guilt, mood, and disability is currently unknown. This study tested 3 theoretical models to explore possible pathways between these factors. In Model 1, diagnostic uncertainty was hypothesized to correlate with pain-related guilt, which in turn would positively correlate with depression, anxiety and disability. Two alternative models were tested: (a) a path from depression and anxiety to guilt, from guilt to diagnostic uncertainty, and finally to disability; (b) a model in which depression and anxiety, and independently, diagnostic uncertainty, were associated with guilt, which in turn was associated with disability. Method: Structural equation modeling was employed on data from 413 participants with chronic LBP. Results: All 3 models showed a reasonable-to-good fit with the data, with the 2 alternative models providing marginally better fit indices. Guilt, and especially social guilt, was associated with disability in all 3 models. Diagnostic uncertainty was associated with guilt, but only moderately. Low mood was also associated with guilt. Conclusions: Two newly defined factors, pain related guilt and diagnostic uncertainty, appear to be linked to disability and mood in people with LBP. The causal path of these links cannot be established in this cross sectional study. However, pain-related guilt especially appears to be important, and future research should examine whether interventions directly targeting guilt improve outcomes.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 10 January 2016

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 469255
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/469255
ISSN: 0278-6133
PURE UUID: 30a4f89e-c57e-4cea-9434-3090f4900553
ORCID for Tamar Pincus: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3172-5624

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Sep 2022 17:04
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:11

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Danijela Serbic
Author: Tamar Pincus ORCID iD
Author: Chris Fife-Schaw
Author: Helen Dawson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×