Persistent back pain - why do physical therapy clinicians continue treatment? A mixed methods study of chiropractors, osteopaths and physiotherapists
Persistent back pain - why do physical therapy clinicians continue treatment? A mixed methods study of chiropractors, osteopaths and physiotherapists
Aims: (a) To investigate how widespread is the use of long term treatment without improvement amongst clinicians treating individuals with low back pain. (b) To Study the beliefs behind the reasons why chiropractors, osteopaths and physiotherapists continue to treat people whose low back pain appears not to be improving.Methods: A mixed methods study, including a questionnaire survey and qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews. Questionnaire survey; 354/600 (59%) clinicians equally distributed between chiropractic, osteopathy and physiotherapy professions. Interview study; a purposive sample of fourteen clinicians from each profession identified from the survey responses. Methodological techniques ranged from grounded theory analysis to sorting of categories by both the research team and the subjects themselves.Results: At least 10% of each of the professions reported that they continued to treat patients with low back pain who showed almost no improvement for over three months. There is some indication that this is an underestimate. reasons for continuing unsuccessful management of low back pain were not found to be primarily monetary in nature; rather it appears to have much more to do with the scope of care that extends beyond issues addressed in the current physical therapy guidelines. The interview data showed that clinicians viewed their role as including health education and counselling rather than a 'cure or refer' approach. Additionally, participants raised concerns that discharging patients from their care meant sending them to into a therapeutic void.Conclusion: Long-term treatment of patients with low back pain without objective signs of improvement is an established practice in a minority of clinicians studied. This approach contrasts with clinical guidelines that encourage self-management, reassurance, reactivation, and involvement of multidisciplinary teams for patients who do not recover. Some of the rationale provided makes a strong case for ongoing contact. However, the practice is also maintained through poor communication with other professions and mistrust of the healthcare system. (C) 2005 European Federation of Chapters of the International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
back pain, cognitions, treatment, qualitative, chiropractors, physiotherapists, osteopaths, GENERAL-PRACTICE, MANAGEMENT, CARE, GUIDELINES, SERVICES
67-76
Pincus, Tamar
55388347-5d71-4fc0-9fd2-66fbba080e0c
Vogel, S
8dedb290-08ca-4926-9d75-8943ac1ff7ac
Breen, A
5c40b654-4662-4342-9936-413a0550e7f5
Foster, N
2ca79c15-6ada-4b99-982c-f8abee19e628
Underwood, M
239a8609-e7b5-4acb-aaf9-9e7f717f0d62
January 2006
Pincus, Tamar
55388347-5d71-4fc0-9fd2-66fbba080e0c
Vogel, S
8dedb290-08ca-4926-9d75-8943ac1ff7ac
Breen, A
5c40b654-4662-4342-9936-413a0550e7f5
Foster, N
2ca79c15-6ada-4b99-982c-f8abee19e628
Underwood, M
239a8609-e7b5-4acb-aaf9-9e7f717f0d62
Pincus, Tamar, Vogel, S, Breen, A, Foster, N and Underwood, M
(2006)
Persistent back pain - why do physical therapy clinicians continue treatment? A mixed methods study of chiropractors, osteopaths and physiotherapists.
European Journal of Pain, 10 (1), .
(doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.01.008).
Abstract
Aims: (a) To investigate how widespread is the use of long term treatment without improvement amongst clinicians treating individuals with low back pain. (b) To Study the beliefs behind the reasons why chiropractors, osteopaths and physiotherapists continue to treat people whose low back pain appears not to be improving.Methods: A mixed methods study, including a questionnaire survey and qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews. Questionnaire survey; 354/600 (59%) clinicians equally distributed between chiropractic, osteopathy and physiotherapy professions. Interview study; a purposive sample of fourteen clinicians from each profession identified from the survey responses. Methodological techniques ranged from grounded theory analysis to sorting of categories by both the research team and the subjects themselves.Results: At least 10% of each of the professions reported that they continued to treat patients with low back pain who showed almost no improvement for over three months. There is some indication that this is an underestimate. reasons for continuing unsuccessful management of low back pain were not found to be primarily monetary in nature; rather it appears to have much more to do with the scope of care that extends beyond issues addressed in the current physical therapy guidelines. The interview data showed that clinicians viewed their role as including health education and counselling rather than a 'cure or refer' approach. Additionally, participants raised concerns that discharging patients from their care meant sending them to into a therapeutic void.Conclusion: Long-term treatment of patients with low back pain without objective signs of improvement is an established practice in a minority of clinicians studied. This approach contrasts with clinical guidelines that encourage self-management, reassurance, reactivation, and involvement of multidisciplinary teams for patients who do not recover. Some of the rationale provided makes a strong case for ongoing contact. However, the practice is also maintained through poor communication with other professions and mistrust of the healthcare system. (C) 2005 European Federation of Chapters of the International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: January 2006
Keywords:
back pain, cognitions, treatment, qualitative, chiropractors, physiotherapists, osteopaths, GENERAL-PRACTICE, MANAGEMENT, CARE, GUIDELINES, SERVICES
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 469276
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/469276
ISSN: 1090-3801
PURE UUID: f6d3ec3e-d573-4fb8-a1c3-6a11a3079a04
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 Sep 2022 16:44
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:11
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Tamar Pincus
Author:
S Vogel
Author:
A Breen
Author:
N Foster
Author:
M Underwood
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics