A comparative study on the use of calibrated and rainbow schlieren techniques in axisymmetric supersonic jets
A comparative study on the use of calibrated and rainbow schlieren techniques in axisymmetric supersonic jets
Detailed experimental comparisons had been conducted between calibrated and rainbow schlieren on perfectly- and under-expanded axisymmetric supersonic jets through a modified Z-type schlieren system. The techniques were implemented by using a weak lens in the field-of-view to provide calibration information for the extraction of quantitative density gradients from the experimental schlieren images. Sixth-order polynomial curve fits were obtained for both calibrated and rainbow schlieren respectively. The effects of light inhomogeneity caused by the mirrors and system diaphragm aperture had been evaluated for the colour images and results indicate that averaging the background hue is an acceptable approach for minimizing light variations with less than 2% experimental error. Density gradients as calculated via Abel transform have also been evaluated to validate the two different set-ups. Additionally, experimental results have been compared to validated numerical results and they show that calibrated schlieren is able to predict density gradients within 2% of the numerical results. This is significantly more superior to rainbow schlieren, where errors in the estimated density gradients are closer to 20%. It is shown here that rainbow schlieren results are more adversely impacted by the system diaphragm aperture, especially for vertical light cut-off configuration. This is partly due to the loss of sensitivity of the schlieren system, as well as potential light diffusion caused by the filter.
218-228
Mariani, R
d7dc30ee-83ae-46d9-8ee8-a9370f7f00af
Zang, B.
ca544af2-1b0f-4a1a-9f9b-1380383ab5ae
Lim, Desmond
82a7e7e8-2ade-44f8-a342-a99c2b9339c4
U S, Vevek
b56c6e11-f6d0-4d57-820c-fc75e77b2d0a
New, T.H.
f35405df-ad65-4b96-9d6b-06afebdd43a8
Cui, Y D
eed2f6b6-0ac8-4e15-bd8e-1064a93713f4
1 April 2019
Mariani, R
d7dc30ee-83ae-46d9-8ee8-a9370f7f00af
Zang, B.
ca544af2-1b0f-4a1a-9f9b-1380383ab5ae
Lim, Desmond
82a7e7e8-2ade-44f8-a342-a99c2b9339c4
U S, Vevek
b56c6e11-f6d0-4d57-820c-fc75e77b2d0a
New, T.H.
f35405df-ad65-4b96-9d6b-06afebdd43a8
Cui, Y D
eed2f6b6-0ac8-4e15-bd8e-1064a93713f4
Mariani, R, Zang, B., Lim, Desmond, U S, Vevek, New, T.H. and Cui, Y D
(2019)
A comparative study on the use of calibrated and rainbow schlieren techniques in axisymmetric supersonic jets.
Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 66, .
(doi:10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2019.01.007).
Abstract
Detailed experimental comparisons had been conducted between calibrated and rainbow schlieren on perfectly- and under-expanded axisymmetric supersonic jets through a modified Z-type schlieren system. The techniques were implemented by using a weak lens in the field-of-view to provide calibration information for the extraction of quantitative density gradients from the experimental schlieren images. Sixth-order polynomial curve fits were obtained for both calibrated and rainbow schlieren respectively. The effects of light inhomogeneity caused by the mirrors and system diaphragm aperture had been evaluated for the colour images and results indicate that averaging the background hue is an acceptable approach for minimizing light variations with less than 2% experimental error. Density gradients as calculated via Abel transform have also been evaluated to validate the two different set-ups. Additionally, experimental results have been compared to validated numerical results and they show that calibrated schlieren is able to predict density gradients within 2% of the numerical results. This is significantly more superior to rainbow schlieren, where errors in the estimated density gradients are closer to 20%. It is shown here that rainbow schlieren results are more adversely impacted by the system diaphragm aperture, especially for vertical light cut-off configuration. This is partly due to the loss of sensitivity of the schlieren system, as well as potential light diffusion caused by the filter.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 8 January 2019
Published date: 1 April 2019
Additional Information:
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 469322
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/469322
ISSN: 0955-5986
PURE UUID: d7a0cf13-67a2-4c01-b320-0122259dde32
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 13 Sep 2022 16:43
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 21:04
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
R Mariani
Author:
B. Zang
Author:
Vevek U S
Author:
T.H. New
Author:
Y D Cui
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics