The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The influence of patients' and primary care practitioners' beliefs and expectations about chronic musculoskeletal pain on the process of care - A systematic review of qualitative studies

The influence of patients' and primary care practitioners' beliefs and expectations about chronic musculoskeletal pain on the process of care - A systematic review of qualitative studies
The influence of patients' and primary care practitioners' beliefs and expectations about chronic musculoskeletal pain on the process of care - A systematic review of qualitative studies
Objectives: To review qualitative, empirical studies exploring the influence of patients' and primary care practitioners' beliefs and expectations on the process of care for chronic musculoskeletal pain.Methods: A multidisciplinary review group searched 9 bibliographic databases. The group worked in pairs to screen titles and abstracts for relevance, to quality appraise relevant studies, to extract data from high-quality studies and to undertake a thematic analysis of this data.Results: We identified 12,994 abstracts from our searches, of which we obtained 113 full-text articles as their abstracts contained insufficient information for us to decide on their eligibility. We appraised 22 qualitative studies, 15 of which were included in the analysis. Themes identified included; (1) beliefs about pain, (2) expectations of treatment, (3) trust, and (4) patient education. Both patients and practitioners wanted clear communication within the consultation and to be respected, but conflicts existed on nearly all other aspects of the consultation, some of which at present may seem insurmountable and may lead to difficulties in achieving positive outcomes.Discussion: To tackle the challenges and conflicts identified within the review, change may have to occur, not just in individual patient and practitioner beliefs and behavior, but also at an organizational and system level, for example, changes in undergraduate and postgraduate education and changes in the organization and availability of health services.
qualitative, review, chronic pain, LOW-BACK-PAIN, GENERAL-PRACTICE, PATIENTS VIEWS, CONSULTATION, EXPERIENCE, PHYSICIANS, EDUCATION
0749-8047
91-98
Parsons, Suzanne
7dba4c5c-90bb-4df7-a61b-734649fedb49
Harding, Geoffrey
bef7d7a5-a101-4a78-aa3d-ed3b5f35a09e
Breen, Alan
8227c8aa-a9d2-49e3-94c6-7fd7b12e1313
Foster, Nadine
2ca79c15-6ada-4b99-982c-f8abee19e628
Pincus, Tamar
55388347-5d71-4fc0-9fd2-66fbba080e0c
Vogel, Steve
43454f80-c889-4d7b-b6e3-231ed7015c0f
Underwood, Martin
239a8609-e7b5-4acb-aaf9-9e7f717f0d62
Parsons, Suzanne
7dba4c5c-90bb-4df7-a61b-734649fedb49
Harding, Geoffrey
bef7d7a5-a101-4a78-aa3d-ed3b5f35a09e
Breen, Alan
8227c8aa-a9d2-49e3-94c6-7fd7b12e1313
Foster, Nadine
2ca79c15-6ada-4b99-982c-f8abee19e628
Pincus, Tamar
55388347-5d71-4fc0-9fd2-66fbba080e0c
Vogel, Steve
43454f80-c889-4d7b-b6e3-231ed7015c0f
Underwood, Martin
239a8609-e7b5-4acb-aaf9-9e7f717f0d62

Parsons, Suzanne, Harding, Geoffrey, Breen, Alan, Foster, Nadine, Pincus, Tamar, Vogel, Steve and Underwood, Martin (2007) The influence of patients' and primary care practitioners' beliefs and expectations about chronic musculoskeletal pain on the process of care - A systematic review of qualitative studies. Clinical Journal of Pain, 23 (1), 91-98. (doi:10.1097/01.ajp.0000210947.34676.34).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: To review qualitative, empirical studies exploring the influence of patients' and primary care practitioners' beliefs and expectations on the process of care for chronic musculoskeletal pain.Methods: A multidisciplinary review group searched 9 bibliographic databases. The group worked in pairs to screen titles and abstracts for relevance, to quality appraise relevant studies, to extract data from high-quality studies and to undertake a thematic analysis of this data.Results: We identified 12,994 abstracts from our searches, of which we obtained 113 full-text articles as their abstracts contained insufficient information for us to decide on their eligibility. We appraised 22 qualitative studies, 15 of which were included in the analysis. Themes identified included; (1) beliefs about pain, (2) expectations of treatment, (3) trust, and (4) patient education. Both patients and practitioners wanted clear communication within the consultation and to be respected, but conflicts existed on nearly all other aspects of the consultation, some of which at present may seem insurmountable and may lead to difficulties in achieving positive outcomes.Discussion: To tackle the challenges and conflicts identified within the review, change may have to occur, not just in individual patient and practitioner beliefs and behavior, but also at an organizational and system level, for example, changes in undergraduate and postgraduate education and changes in the organization and availability of health services.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: January 2007
Keywords: qualitative, review, chronic pain, LOW-BACK-PAIN, GENERAL-PRACTICE, PATIENTS VIEWS, CONSULTATION, EXPERIENCE, PHYSICIANS, EDUCATION

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 469360
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/469360
ISSN: 0749-8047
PURE UUID: a38596fa-6236-4a56-8fce-7eb4145702da
ORCID for Tamar Pincus: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3172-5624

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 Sep 2022 16:58
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:11

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Suzanne Parsons
Author: Geoffrey Harding
Author: Alan Breen
Author: Nadine Foster
Author: Tamar Pincus ORCID iD
Author: Steve Vogel
Author: Martin Underwood

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×