The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Patients' satisfaction with osteopathic and GP management of low back pain in the same surgery

Patients' satisfaction with osteopathic and GP management of low back pain in the same surgery
Patients' satisfaction with osteopathic and GP management of low back pain in the same surgery
Chronic low back patients reported their satisfaction with the treatment they received for back pain from GPs and osteopaths practising in the same surgery. Although levels of satisfaction were high for all treatments, patients reported significantly higher scores for satisfaction with the osteopathic treatment. The difference was stronger for aspects of care/communication and competence, and weaker for satisfaction with efficacy. These findings are discussed in reference to patients' expectations, novelty, time spent with patients, number of visits, and patients' age. (C) 2000 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.
GENERAL-PRACTICE, QUESTIONNAIRE, DEPRESSION, PREDICTORS, DISABILITY, OUTCOMES
0965-2299
180-186
Pincus, Tamar
55388347-5d71-4fc0-9fd2-66fbba080e0c
Vogel, S
8dedb290-08ca-4926-9d75-8943ac1ff7ac
Savage, R
ea743515-784e-499b-87a6-865458da937e
Newman, S
b9452610-434e-4560-86b1-9a79b6880209
Pincus, Tamar
55388347-5d71-4fc0-9fd2-66fbba080e0c
Vogel, S
8dedb290-08ca-4926-9d75-8943ac1ff7ac
Savage, R
ea743515-784e-499b-87a6-865458da937e
Newman, S
b9452610-434e-4560-86b1-9a79b6880209

Pincus, Tamar, Vogel, S, Savage, R and Newman, S (2000) Patients' satisfaction with osteopathic and GP management of low back pain in the same surgery. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 8 (3), 180-186. (doi:10.1054/ctim.2000.0378).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Chronic low back patients reported their satisfaction with the treatment they received for back pain from GPs and osteopaths practising in the same surgery. Although levels of satisfaction were high for all treatments, patients reported significantly higher scores for satisfaction with the osteopathic treatment. The difference was stronger for aspects of care/communication and competence, and weaker for satisfaction with efficacy. These findings are discussed in reference to patients' expectations, novelty, time spent with patients, number of visits, and patients' age. (C) 2000 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: September 2000
Keywords: GENERAL-PRACTICE, QUESTIONNAIRE, DEPRESSION, PREDICTORS, DISABILITY, OUTCOMES

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 469384
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/469384
ISSN: 0965-2299
PURE UUID: 963ae03c-1b1c-4487-aff4-78c6d293fc68
ORCID for Tamar Pincus: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3172-5624

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Sep 2022 16:40
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:11

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Tamar Pincus ORCID iD
Author: S Vogel
Author: R Savage
Author: S Newman

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×