Testing a model of consultation-based reassurance and back pain outcomes with psychological risk as moderator: A prospective cohort study
Testing a model of consultation-based reassurance and back pain outcomes with psychological risk as moderator: A prospective cohort study
Objectives: Reassurance is an essential part of treatment for low back pain (LBP), but evidence on effective methods to deliver reassurance remains scarce. The interaction between consultation-based reassurance and patients' psychological risk is unknown. Our objective was to investigate the relationship between consultation-based reassurance and clinical outcomes at follow up, in people with and without psychological risk.Methods: We tested the associations between specific reassurance components (data gathering; relationship building, generic reassurance and cognitive reassurance), patients' psychological risk (the presence of depression, anxiety, catastrophizing or fear-avoidance), and post-consultation outcomes including; satisfaction and enablement, disability, pain and mood at 3-month follow-up.Results: Adjusted linear regression models using data from patients who had recently consulted for LBP in primary care (n=142 in 43 practices) indicated that all reassurance components were strongly associated with increased satisfaction, while generic reassurance was significantly associated with post-consultation enablement. Generic reassurance was also associated with lower pain at three months, while cognitive reassurance was associated with increased pain. A significant interaction was observed between generic reassurance and psychological risk for depression at three-months: high rates of generic reassurance were associated with lower depression in low risk patients, but with higher rates of depression for high risk groups.Discussion: The findings support the hypothesis that different components of reassurance are associated with specific outcomes, and that psychological risk moderates this relationship for depression. Doctors' reassuring behaviours might therefore have the potential to improve outcomes in people with LBP, especially for patients with higher psychological risk profiles.
339-348
Holt, Nicola
e5cfda65-14d4-4773-bf4a-cf96f00bb5e6
Mansell, Gemma
be6d92d7-996f-49a2-b598-d3be41a1b6d5
Hill, Jonathan
8e544af1-9ac0-46d3-9821-2c0014a61a85
Pincus, Tamar
55388347-5d71-4fc0-9fd2-66fbba080e0c
1 April 2018
Holt, Nicola
e5cfda65-14d4-4773-bf4a-cf96f00bb5e6
Mansell, Gemma
be6d92d7-996f-49a2-b598-d3be41a1b6d5
Hill, Jonathan
8e544af1-9ac0-46d3-9821-2c0014a61a85
Pincus, Tamar
55388347-5d71-4fc0-9fd2-66fbba080e0c
Holt, Nicola, Mansell, Gemma, Hill, Jonathan and Pincus, Tamar
(2018)
Testing a model of consultation-based reassurance and back pain outcomes with psychological risk as moderator: A prospective cohort study.
Clinical Journal of Pain, 34 (4), .
(doi:10.1097/AJP.0000000000000541).
Abstract
Objectives: Reassurance is an essential part of treatment for low back pain (LBP), but evidence on effective methods to deliver reassurance remains scarce. The interaction between consultation-based reassurance and patients' psychological risk is unknown. Our objective was to investigate the relationship between consultation-based reassurance and clinical outcomes at follow up, in people with and without psychological risk.Methods: We tested the associations between specific reassurance components (data gathering; relationship building, generic reassurance and cognitive reassurance), patients' psychological risk (the presence of depression, anxiety, catastrophizing or fear-avoidance), and post-consultation outcomes including; satisfaction and enablement, disability, pain and mood at 3-month follow-up.Results: Adjusted linear regression models using data from patients who had recently consulted for LBP in primary care (n=142 in 43 practices) indicated that all reassurance components were strongly associated with increased satisfaction, while generic reassurance was significantly associated with post-consultation enablement. Generic reassurance was also associated with lower pain at three months, while cognitive reassurance was associated with increased pain. A significant interaction was observed between generic reassurance and psychological risk for depression at three-months: high rates of generic reassurance were associated with lower depression in low risk patients, but with higher rates of depression for high risk groups.Discussion: The findings support the hypothesis that different components of reassurance are associated with specific outcomes, and that psychological risk moderates this relationship for depression. Doctors' reassuring behaviours might therefore have the potential to improve outcomes in people with LBP, especially for patients with higher psychological risk profiles.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 1 April 2018
Additional Information:
Copyright © 2018, Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 469395
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/469395
ISSN: 0749-8047
PURE UUID: 49ff17c6-ffce-4285-b197-2a7c70bd742a
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 14 Sep 2022 16:42
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:11
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Nicola Holt
Author:
Gemma Mansell
Author:
Jonathan Hill
Author:
Tamar Pincus
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics