The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Vision-based body tracking: Turning Kinect into a clinical tool

Vision-based body tracking: Turning Kinect into a clinical tool
Vision-based body tracking: Turning Kinect into a clinical tool
Purpose: Vision-based body tracking technologies, originally developed for the consumer gaming market, are being repurposed to form the core of a range of innovative healthcare applications in the clinical assessment and rehabilitation of movement ability. Vision-based body tracking has substantial potential, but there are technical limitations. Method: We use our “stories from the field” to articulate the challenges and offer examples of how these can be overcome. Results: We illustrate that: (i) substantial effort is needed to determine the measures and feedback vision-based body tracking should provide, accounting for the practicalities of the technology (e.g. range) as well as new environments (e.g. home). (ii) Practical considerations are important when planning data capture so that data is analysable, whether finding ways to support a patient or ensuring everyone does the exercise in the same manner. (iii) Home is a place of opportunity for vision-based body tracking, but what we do now in the clinic (e.g. balance tests) or in the home (e.g. play games) will require modifications to achieve capturable, clinically relevant measures. Conclusions: This article articulates how vision-based body tracking works and when it does not to continue to inspire our clinical colleagues to imagine new applications.Implications for RehabilitationVision-based body tracking has quickly been repurposed to form the core of innovative healthcare applications in clinical assessment and rehabilitation, but there are clinical as well as practical challenges to make such systems a reality.Substantial effort needs to go into determining what types of measures and feedback vision-based body tracking should provide. This needs to account for the practicalities of the technology (e.g. range) as well as the opportunities of new environments (e.g. the home).Practical considerations need to be accounted for when planning capture in a particular environment so that data is analysable, whether it be finding a chair substitute, ways to support a patient or ensuring everyone does the exercise in the same manner.The home is a place of opportunity with vision-based body tracking, but it would be naïve to think that we can do what we do now in the clinic (e.g. balance tests) or in the home (e.g. play games), without appropriate modifications to what constitutes a practically capturable, clinically relevant measure.
0963-8288
516-520
Morrison, Cecily
6e940ad7-24f8-4e2c-8001-68d8c6a63d65
Culmer, Peter
b3ace9bd-c71b-45e3-953b-acc309da8f8f
Mentis, Helena
ab7e84af-709f-439b-a8b5-b5d691f6ceb6
Pincus, Tamar
55388347-5d71-4fc0-9fd2-66fbba080e0c
Morrison, Cecily
6e940ad7-24f8-4e2c-8001-68d8c6a63d65
Culmer, Peter
b3ace9bd-c71b-45e3-953b-acc309da8f8f
Mentis, Helena
ab7e84af-709f-439b-a8b5-b5d691f6ceb6
Pincus, Tamar
55388347-5d71-4fc0-9fd2-66fbba080e0c

Morrison, Cecily, Culmer, Peter, Mentis, Helena and Pincus, Tamar (2016) Vision-based body tracking: Turning Kinect into a clinical tool. Disability and Rehabilitation, 11 (6), 516-520. (doi:10.3109/17483107.2014.989419).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Purpose: Vision-based body tracking technologies, originally developed for the consumer gaming market, are being repurposed to form the core of a range of innovative healthcare applications in the clinical assessment and rehabilitation of movement ability. Vision-based body tracking has substantial potential, but there are technical limitations. Method: We use our “stories from the field” to articulate the challenges and offer examples of how these can be overcome. Results: We illustrate that: (i) substantial effort is needed to determine the measures and feedback vision-based body tracking should provide, accounting for the practicalities of the technology (e.g. range) as well as new environments (e.g. home). (ii) Practical considerations are important when planning data capture so that data is analysable, whether finding ways to support a patient or ensuring everyone does the exercise in the same manner. (iii) Home is a place of opportunity for vision-based body tracking, but what we do now in the clinic (e.g. balance tests) or in the home (e.g. play games) will require modifications to achieve capturable, clinically relevant measures. Conclusions: This article articulates how vision-based body tracking works and when it does not to continue to inspire our clinical colleagues to imagine new applications.Implications for RehabilitationVision-based body tracking has quickly been repurposed to form the core of innovative healthcare applications in clinical assessment and rehabilitation, but there are clinical as well as practical challenges to make such systems a reality.Substantial effort needs to go into determining what types of measures and feedback vision-based body tracking should provide. This needs to account for the practicalities of the technology (e.g. range) as well as the opportunities of new environments (e.g. the home).Practical considerations need to be accounted for when planning capture in a particular environment so that data is analysable, whether it be finding a chair substitute, ways to support a patient or ensuring everyone does the exercise in the same manner.The home is a place of opportunity with vision-based body tracking, but it would be naïve to think that we can do what we do now in the clinic (e.g. balance tests) or in the home (e.g. play games), without appropriate modifications to what constitutes a practically capturable, clinically relevant measure.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 14 December 2014
Published date: 1 June 2016
Additional Information: Copyright: 2014 Informa UK Ltd

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 469482
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/469482
ISSN: 0963-8288
PURE UUID: 40d48584-cca5-4e05-aa0a-fc4adf62aab4
ORCID for Tamar Pincus: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3172-5624

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Sep 2022 16:45
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:11

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Cecily Morrison
Author: Peter Culmer
Author: Helena Mentis
Author: Tamar Pincus ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×